This Threat Is Head and Shoulders Above the Rest

I've talked about this for some time with others.
You might recall an article I posted which was about the people that test the Back-Up Generators... they had a high failure rate with broken crankshafts and lesser.
But with that you are not going to get one running in a day!!


http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/12/23/this-threat-is-head-and-shoulders-above-the-rest/

This Threat Is Head and Shoulders Above the Rest
23 Dec, 2014 by Dave Hodges
Print this article Font size -16+

 
With the North Korean hackers unleashing their fury upon SONY executives over the movie The Interview, alarm bells have been raised among those who have researched the threat to our power grid. We understand how this low level threat could escalate with regard to a grave threat upon our power grid.
China, Russia and North Korea all possess significant EMP attack capabilities as was pointed out in a previous article. North Korea is a proxy state which does the bidding of China and now China’s intimate economic and military partner, Russia. Having North Korea execute a cyber-based or missile based attack upon the power grid of the United States, would provide Russia and China a thinly veiled layer of plausible deniability.
The warnings are clear and these dire warnings which tell of a threat upon our power grid have been delivered by very powerful people and as of today,these warnings have been ignored.
 
Some top officials in government and in business have taken notice of the threat posed to America by an EMP attack. In January of 2013, and again in her August 2013 farewell address as the outgoing  Director of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano made it clear that it was a matter of when, not if the grid was taken down by a “cyber 911″. In this video, DHS Director, Janet Napolitano reinforces her belief that an attack upon our grid is a near, clear and present danger.
 
 
 

Quote :

 Napolitano has expressed concern because virtually nothing is being done.
My Congressman, Trent Franks, has expressed the exact same concerns as Napolitano. And unless one has researched this threat, or has attended one of Franks’ Townhall meetings, one would not know of the threat because the MSM has all but ignored the biggest threat to America’s survival as a reported news event. 

 

Just like Janet Napolitano, Paul Singer has stated that “It is not a matter of if but when and EMP attack takes down our grid”.
Joining the former DHS director in her concerns about an impending EMP attack is billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Singer who has issued a very dire warning for investors in which he calls the threat of a widespread blackout from an electromagnetic surge the “most significant danger” in the world.” Singer wrote to clients of his $24.8 billion Elliott Management  in a standard investment update letter. “Even horrendous nuclear war, except in its most extreme form, can [be] a relatively localized issue, and the threat from asteroids can (possibly) be mitigated.”
Why isn’t something, along the lines of the Paul Singer proclamation of the need to do something to harden the grid against an EMP attack, being done right now? After all, Singer doesn’t pull any punches when he says that an EMP attack upon our grid would likely be worse than an asteroid strike upon the earth or all-out nuclear war. Are Paul Singer and Janet Napolitano simply lone voices in the wilderness whose dire warnings have no basis in fact? Or, is there is something much more dire going on?
 
The threats posed by a nuclear meltdown are catastrophic. What if the United States was facing 124 nuclear meltdowns, similar in scope to the meltdown at Fukushima, all at the same time?
 
Fukushima is often spoken of by many, as a possible extinction level event because of the radiation threat. Fukushima continues to wreak havoc upon the world and in the United States as we are being bathed in deadly radiation from this event.

Because of Fukushima, fish are becoming inedible and the ocean currents as well as the prevailing ocean winds are carrying deadly radiation. Undoubtedly, by this time, the radioactivity has made its way into the transpiration cycle which means that crops are being dowsed with deadly radiation. The radiation has undoubtedly made its way into the water table in many areas and impacts every aspect of the food supply. The health costs to human beings is incalculable. However, this article is not about the devastation at Fukushima, instead, this article focuses on the fact that North America could have a total of 124 Fukushima events if the necessary conditions were present and who is ultimately responsible for this potential cataclysm.
 
None of the NERC, or the Nuclear Regulatory tests of handling a prolonged blackout at a nuclear power plant has answered two critical questions, “What happens when these nuclear power plants run out of diesel fuel needed to run the generators”, and “What happens when some of these generators fail”? In the event of an EMP attack, can tanker trucks with diesel fuel get to all of the nuclear power plants in the US in time to re-fuel them before they stop running? Will tanker trucks even be running themselves in the aftermath of an EMP attack? And in the event of an EMP attack, it is not likely that any plant which runs low on fuel, or has a generator malfunctions, will ever get any help to mitigate the crisis prior to a plethora of meltdowns occurring. Thus, every nuclear power plant in the country has the potential to cause a Chernobyl or Fukushima type accident if our country is hit by an EMP attack.

Quote :

CAN YOU EVEN IMAGINE 124 FUKUSHIMA EVENTS IN NORTH AMERICA HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME? THIS WOULD CONSTITUTE THE ULTIMATE DEPOPULATION EVENT.

As Congressman Franks has stated, the hardening of our power grid could be accomplished for the price of one B-1 Stealth Bomber. Why then, is this not being done? Perhaps the following quotes, which are representative of a much larger body of quotes, represents the collective ideology of the global elite and their disdain for humanity. Yes, I am stating for the record that the following quotes expose the bottom line of the world’s power brokers.
 
It would be a mistake for people to view the present crisis as merely a geopolitical struggle. Just as the Obama administration allies of individuals such as Al Sharpton fan the flames of racial discord in the name of divide and conquer, there is a guiding hand that serves to perpetuate the same agenda between nations. I am convinced that most of the globalists believe that the only way to create the New World Order is to completely destroy what is currently in place. As a result, I have come to believe that a great culling is in our future. There is a reoccurring theme contained within the personal words of several dozen global leaders which merits serious consideration. In the interest of brevity, only a few globalist depopulation quotes will be presented here, but they represent a much larger body of similar philosophies ranging from international bankers, recognized world leaders, United Nations officials, Supreme Court judges, CEO’s and virtually the entire environmental movement.

Quote :

“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal”.
-Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine

Quote :

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order”.
-David Rockefeller

Quote :

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary”.
-Initiative for the United Nations ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER (RE: Agenda 21)

Quote :

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren, Co-author of “Ecoscience”

Quote :

“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms”.