Guest
Guest
 |  Subject: Catholic Mystics Ponder Role Of Petrus Romanus Against Fatima Coverup Backdrop  Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:43 am | |
| Catholic Mystics Ponder Role Of Petrus Romanus Against Fatima Coverup Backdrop 
Fourth, while bishops in India, the Philippines and other tropical countries wear white cassocks, no one would have the "impression" that any of them was the Pope. If the devastated city in the vision is Rome, however, and the white-clad bishop is fleeing from the Vatican over the bodies of his subjects, the vision would coincide with a vision of Pope Saint Pius X that a future Pope bearing his name — Giuseppe (Joseph) Sarto before his election — would flee the Vatican under such circumstances only to die a horrible death a short time later. Benedict XVI was named Joseph Ratzinger before he ascended to the throne of Peter. The question presents itself: Does the vision published in 2000 take place during a time when there is more than one white-clad bishop living in the Vatican? That is, does it take place in our time — the only time in Church history when a Pope has not only resigned under suspicious circumstances but has made it clear that he considers himself to have resigned only the "active exercise of the Petrine ministry" (as if one could resign only one aspect of the papal office) while retaining the Pope's white cassock, the papal coat of arms, and even the very name he had as Pope? |
|
