Welcome to Watcher Forum
 
HomeCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistRegisterLog in

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Share | 
 

 goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
spring2
Super Elite
avatar

Posts : 8858
Reputation : 246
Join date : 2012-01-06

PostSubject: goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.    Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:02 pm

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/urgent-call-to-action-to-trump-and-his-supporters


Urgent Call To Action To Trump And His Supporters
RedFlag Newsdesk
Politics




Eddie Savage | RedFlag News Desk
The goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA. If they can make the recount go beyond the Dec. 18 deadline, then they then only have to bribe 7 electors to change their votes from Trump to Clinton in order for Clinton to win.
To combat this, Trump needs to call/pay for recounts in California - due to voter fraud, Virginia, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Colorado.
He needs to drag out the counts in these states so that she can't get the electoral votes there.
The deadlines are passing and Trump must use the law in his favor. That's what Hillary's camp is doing. They are waiting until the last second so Trump doesn’t have time to respond.
If you can, sign up to volunteer for the recount:
http://www.jill2016.com/recountwi
The rest of us need take our info, and broadcast it just like we did about voter fraud during the election: Email conservative newspapers and radio, send out tweets (#RecountHoldup? #ElectionTheft?), generally make what Biden would colloquially refer to as "a big fucking deal" of the situation.
And, most importantly, EVERYONE EVERYWHERE can proactively broadcast on social media and via email to election officials that we are watching and will embarrass the hell out of any election official who lets fraud happen on his/her watch.
Everybody can warn the election officials that we will be watching and will horribly embarrass them if they screw around during the recounts... This is potentially the most important thing we can do...
Wisconsin: 1-866-VOTE-WIS and elections@wi.gov
Michigan: 517-373-2540 and Twitter @michsos and http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,1607,7-127-13162---,00.html
Pennsylvania: (717) 787-6458 and (717) 787-5280 and Twitter @PAStateDept
Trump has been declared the victory of the election, but it’s not over until the electorates are cast and he is sworn in. Hillary and Soros and the Democrats will pull every trick they have, starting with this recount. They need to know that if they thought the anti-Trump protests were bad after the election, should Hillary steal the election, they aint seen nothing yet!
H/T /u/sqlchaos and /u/shadowman3001
Back to top Go down
View user profile
spring2
Super Elite
avatar

Posts : 8858
Reputation : 246
Join date : 2012-01-06

PostSubject: The Big Steal Or The Big Con? Stein/Clinton Recount Effort For Three Critical States In The Works   Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:41 pm

http://allnewspipeline.com/The_Big_Steal_Or_Big_Con.php

Surprise! It Isn't Over Yet - The Big Steal Or The Big Con? Stein/Clinton Recount Effort For Three Critical States In The Works

-  Jill Stein Fundraises For Recounts In States Trump Won But Not States Clinton Won By A Smaller Margin



By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

For those who thought the seemingly never ending presidential campaign season was over on November 8, 2016 when the polls closed and Donald Trump had topped the 270 electoral needed to win the presidential election, or on November 9, 2016 when Hillary Clinton conceded publicly to Trump..... SURPRISE, it isn't over yet!

We are either watching the biggest steal in a presidential election attempted right before our very eyes, backed by big money donors in order to prevent Donald Trump from becoming the 45th President of the United States of America, or we are watching one of the greatest con jobs ever perpetrated  in the U.S. by Green Party Candidate Jill Stein who continues to line her pockets with millions of dollars.

THE BIG STEAL?

By the end of election night, Donald Trump had 290 electoral votes to Hillary Clinton's 232, but nearly three weeks later, Michigan has finally finished their count and announced Trump as the official winner, which will be certified by the  state's Board of Canvassers on Monday, November 28, 2016. This will add the 16 Michigan electoral votes onto Trump's tally, bringing the final numbers to 306 electoral votes for Trump and 232 for Clinton.



Those numbers are very important to what we are witnessing right now as Green Party candidate, who received approximately one percent of the popular vote and no electoral votes, has filed for a recount in Wisconsin (10 electoral votes) already, and announced plans to file for recounts in both Pennsylvania (20 electoral votes) and Michigan (16 electoral votes). Those three states have a combined total of 46 electoral votes.

The Wisconsin Election Commission has verified that the recount petition has been filed and they are "preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for President of the United States." It is toward the end of the Election Commission release where we see the following paragraph:

"Wisconsin has the most decentralized election system in the United States," Haas said. "The system has strong local control coupled with state oversight, resting on the partnership between the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the 72 county clerks, and the 1,854 municipal clerks. State law clearly gives each county’s Board of Canvassers the primary authority to conduct the recount, and to decide which ballots should and should not be counted. Recounting votes is an open, transparent process in which each of the candidates may have representatives present to raise objections, and where the public may be present to observe."

Emphasis mine.


(Wisconsin Votes cast - Chart via Wisconsin Elections commission website)


Stein is attempting to base her justification for recounts in these three critical states on an already debunked claim by supposed "experts" that voting machines could have been hacked, even those these same "experts" state they have absolutely no proof of any hacking, specifically in Michigan where the state uses paper ballots and not voting machines.

Stein has not initiated a recount petition for either PA, which has a deadline of Monday, November 28th to do so, or in Michigan which has a deadline date of Wednesday, November 30, 2016. Michigan is preparing for the possibility of having to conduct a recount if Stein does file for one, despite the Director of Elections Chris Thomas telling Detroit News that there is no evidence of any hack or voting system manipulation and the White House issuing a statement that the election results "accurately reflect the will of the American people," and that hackers did not sway the results of the election.

All three of these states would have to flip to Hillary Clinton in order to change the results, because no two of these states combined would offer her enough electoral votes to reach the 270 required to win a presidential election. 

We note that Stein is only petitioning for a recount in states that Donald Trump won by a narrow margin, but not states like New Hampshire, which Hillary Clinton won by a far smaller margin, less than 3,000 votes, or Nevada which Hillary won by about 2,600 votes.

It is also noteworthy that during the election cycle Stein had called Hillary Clinton the "queen of corruption," as well as stating on her Twitter account "The DNC had already selected Clinton before the primary began. Every vote for Clinton is a rubber stamp for elitist corruption."

Which begs the question of why Stein would be collecting millions upon millions of dollars for recounts in three key critical states, using "voting machine" manipulation as her justification, when 1) Michigan uses paper ballots and 2) it is a complete impossibility that a recount would garner her even one electoral vote.

Many Alternative News sites and Trump supporters have warned the elite, the globalists that have worked so hard against Trump throughout the campaign season and the MSM that has blatantly promoted Hillary Clinton, would not give up without a fight, hence the constant recent attacks against "fake news," accusing Alternative News sites of spreading "Russian propaganda when Clinton's health or corruption was reported on.

Which brings us to our main questions..... was Jill Stein bought off? Or is she running one of the biggest cons against Americans even seen in a presidential election and lining her pockets will millions of dollars being donated to her for the recount efforts? Last but not least, who exactly is donating these billions to Stein?



THE BIG CON?

One of the first things noticed about Stein's fundraising efforts was that as goals were met, she kept increasing those goals. Screen shots below are courtesy of Zero Hedge and the Wayback Machine, and they show that on November 24, 2016, Stein claimed she needed $2.5 million.



Later that day on November 24, 2016, that fundraising goal had increased to $4.5 million.



By November 25, 2016, Stein increased the goal again to $7 million.



Another detail that was noted is that her "terms", dubbed the "fine print" was being changed as well, as the website Law Newz provides screen shots showing that on November 23, 2016, Stein's fundraising site stated "If we do not raise enough for any recount (which is highly unlikely) we pledge to use the money for election integrity efforts and to promote systematic voting system reform."



By November 25, 2016, the terminology changed to "If we raise more than what's needed, the surplus will also go toward election integrity efforts and to promote voting system reform."



We note there are no specifics on what type of "election integrity" or voting system reform programs the money will go towards, but the bottom line is NO REFUNDS folks! Whatever is not used for the recounts will be used on anything that Stein wants.

Some are calling this a "racket," some dubbing it a "scam" and others, including  liberal Matthew Yglasias are telling people "Folks giving Jill Stein money "for a recount" are gonna be ripped off."


Next up, who is actually donating to Stein's supposed recount efforts? It is clear it is not her own Green Party supporters, since she has raised more for the "recount" than she raised for her entire campaign for president, as Open Secrets has her total campaign fundraising total, as of October 28, 2016, as $3,509,477 and as of the writing of this article, her "recount" fundraising is at $5,763,935.00.

Unfortunately Stein's fundraising website does not provide data on who is donating, but we do see that the Hillary Clinton campaign has decided to participate in the recount efforts, despite all her claims before the election that not accepting the results is "horrifying," ....at least it was horrifying when the shoe was on the other foot and she was talking about Trump not accepting the election results. She doesn't appear to find the idea of not accepting the election results so bad now though.

BOTTOM LINE

There is something very wrong with the whole way this is being handled, from the initial claim that voting machines could have been hacked, specifically using Michigan as an example, when they use paper ballots instead of machines, to the limited number states Stein has chosen, but only states that Trump won narrowly, ignoring states like New Hampshire and Nevada which Clinton won by even smaller margins, as Paul Joseph Watson highlights in his commentary at the end of this article.

Then we have the issue of Stein's increasing fundraising goals along and changing terms, with the fact that she has managed to raise more money in less than a week that she managed during the entirety of her presidential campaign and no one knows where the money is coming from. Plus if any of the states do not allow a recall, the money donated with not be refunded.

Is it  just a coincidence that just days after it was reported that the Clinton campaign was approached and encouraged to demand recounts in WI, PA and MI, that Stein steps forward to ask for recounts in just those states?

Readers are encouraged to weigh in on whether they think this is an attempt at the "big steal" by globalists or whether Jill Stein is in the midst of a "big con" to line her pockets, or if she has been bought off by the Clinton campaign?


https://youtu.be/3smht68eMsw



https://youtu.be/NkluqmzTTeQ








Back to top Go down
View user profile
researcher
moderator
avatar

Posts : 3530
Reputation : 365
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 64
Location : San Diego

PostSubject: Re: goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.    Sun Nov 27, 2016 3:36 pm

If I'm reading this right (see below) Pennsylvania is a dead issue as of last Wednesday 23 November. I smell smoke and I see mirrors!

Jim Stone's web site. Y'all should check this one daily.  http://82.221.129.208


Jim Stone wrote:
RECOUNT IMPOSSIBLE: HERE IT IS, Proof Jillary Stein is launching a dead effort.
HEAVY.COM AND THE REST OF THE MSM IS FULL OF IT, THE LAST CONCEIVABLE OPPORTUNITY TO CALL FOR A RECOUNT IN PENNSYLVANIA WAS THE 23rd, WITH THE GENERAL REQUIREMENT BEING THE CALL MUST BE ENTERED ON OR BEFORE THE 17TH. THIS


WEB SITE AND ITS READERS HAVE PUNKED THE MSM YET AGAIN.


BUSTED: Jill Stein cannot ___________ the election in Pennsylvania and also cannot request a recount.





I went over Pennsylvania election law carefully, and discovered Jill cannot do jack because I am not filling in this blank because I will not provide legal advice to a scammer like Jill and I am not filling in this blank either with another detail that can hang her, because I am not giving advice and I want her to trip on everything possible. Pennsylvania has MORE THAN DUBIOUS odds of doing anything, and this proves her donation request was fraudulent, because there was no recount possible in Pennsylvania and she can't even ____________ because of ______________. Pennsylvania has some really good laws specifically set up to prevent a scammer like Stein from hanging the election up in B.S. legalese which is obviously what she intended to try if she was smart enough to know a recount cannot even be asked for. Perhaps she was not aware, because liberals are surprisingly good at worming their way into fat paychecks while being totally incompetent.

HERE IT IS: The Pennsylvania filing guidelines. People need to read and distribute this to prevent scammers in the system from breaking the law and ramming an illigitimate process down our throats.





Anonymous sent the following election deadlines for Pennsylvania.

Election filing deadlines for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania





NOVEMBER 17
No later than 5:00 P.M . on this day, the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH must issue an order for a recount or re-canvass if it is determined, based on the unofficial returns submitted by the county boards of elections, that a statewide candidate or ballot question that appeared on the ballot in every election district throughout the Commonwealth was defeated by a margin of 1 percent or less.
NOVEMBER 23
Last day on which a recount or re-canvass ordered by the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH can be scheduled to begin.
NOVEMBER 28
On this day, candidates receiving tie votes at the election shall cast lots at 12 Noon before the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH or the county boards of elections, as the case may be, to determine the winner. (If the fact of the tie vote is not authoritatively determined until after November 23, the time for casting lots will be 12 Noon on the second day after the fact of such tie is determined.)
These guidelines do not have the details that wreck Jill's non-recount prospects and I won't say what they are until after it is beyond every last detail too late (and I think it already is) and only after the maggots have eaten every last hope out of this dead effort and flown away will I say anything else I know. BOTTOM LINE: Pennsylvania knew about scammers like Jill long ago, when the laws were written, and protected the system.
NOVEMBER 28
Last day to file petitions to contest the election of any candidate. (Not applicable to elections of the first class.)
NOVEMBER 28
Last day for the county boards of elections to file with the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH returns from the November election .
NOTE:
State level write-in winners of elections from the November election must file Statements of Financial Interests with the State Ethics Commission, Room 309 Finance Building, P.O. Box 11470, Harrisburg, PA 7108-1470 within 30 days of having been elected unless such person resigns within that time. County and local level public office write-in winners of elections must file the Statement with the governing authority of the political subdivision where they were elected within 30 days of having been elected unless such person resigns within that time.
NOVEMBER 29
No later than 12 Noon on this day, a recount or re-canvass ordered by the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH must be completed.
NOVEMBER 30
By 12 Noon on the day after completion of a recount or re-canvass ordered by the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH, but no later than 12 Noon on this day, the county boards of elections must submit to the SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH the results of the re-count or re-canvass
_______________________________________________


Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven  

There's plenty of room for all God's creatures . . .
. . . right next to the mashed potatoes!


Last edited by researcher on Sun Nov 27, 2016 3:38 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : correct data)
Back to top Go down
View user profile
researcher
moderator
avatar

Posts : 3530
Reputation : 365
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 64
Location : San Diego

PostSubject: Re: goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.    Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:55 pm

29 November 2016

Update: From Jim Stone's web site. There is NO WAY JOSE!!! She ain't gonna get it!


Jim Stone wrote:
NOTHING has changed on the recount in Pennsylvania

I was 100 percent right. Jill can't request a recount. She did it better than I thought she would, but is so far out of whack with the timing it is hopeless. Additionally, there was no voter fraud that did not favor Hillary. Pennsylvanian election officials are saying there is no evidence of fraud whatsoever. Pennsylvania is absolutely crucial to flip. It will not be flipped. It will also not be stalled. Pennsylvania is the hang mans noose on the entire deal.

Jill has to do something because she collected the money, but you can cry all you want and nothing comes back from ashes once totally burned.

My big worry is that George Soros has a spoiled three year old and/or chimp and definitely psychopath intellect that just can't accept no for an answer. He is very dangerous. And I have little doubt he'd do something heinous for revenge, and that he might already be burning Gatlinburg.


Keep your eye on the ball, and not Gatlinburg. Nail every last detail you can about the attempted election steal because the only possible way they can do anything is via completely overt paid off corruption.

And while you're reading this go check out the Gatlinburg article over on Jim Stones page. I pasted the first part to get you started. Link below.

http://82.221.129.208



Jim Stone wrote:
Gatlinburg is burning to the ground

This could provide the media cover needed to distract Americans in the middle of an election theft






[MORE AT LINK]

Have a feel good day today fellow deplorables. More good news from Jim Stone below.


Jim Stone wrote:
Nov 28 2016

Jill Stein sued for perjury in Wisconsin recount!
Green party journalist and radio host Don DeBar alleges that the false statements may have induced the state to fraudulently conduct a recount and caused thousands of people to donate a reported sum of $6 million to Stein's effort. DeBar has filed a lawsuit for fraud and perjury against Jill Stein. SEE THIS

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GEORGE SOROS FINANCED RECOUNT LAWYER!
George Soros has his key attorney on the job! SEE THIS

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wisconsin rejected a hand recount!
Jillary will sue. What more to be said?


Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven Like a Star @ heaven  

There's plenty of room for all God's creatures . . .
. . . right next to the mashed potatoes!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.    

Back to top Go down
 
goal of the 'recounts' is to prevent the electoral votes from being counted in WI, MI, PA.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Almost at Goal
» Scared about reaching goal
» Silverfish problem....
» New girl from Sweden!
» Prevent the elimination of al-Hashemi to travel abroad

Permissions in this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
Watcher Forum :: Welcome! :: General Discussion-
Post new topic   Reply to topicJump to: