Welcome to Watcher Forum
HomeCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistRegisterLog in

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Share | 

 Currently, there are no labeling requirements for you to tell if a product contains weaponized nanoparticles.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Super Elite

Posts : 9371
Reputation : 273
Join date : 2012-01-06

PostSubject: Currently, there are no labeling requirements for you to tell if a product contains weaponized nanoparticles.    Mon Aug 07, 2017 8:19 am


[size=32]Nanoparticles & the New Arms Race[/size]
August 2, 2017


What is the newest weapon in the global arms race?  Nanotechnology.
Nanoparticles are in everything from your food, body products, plants, medication, fabrics, and most everyday household items. The danger with nanoparticles is that they are invisible to the eye.  They are also a powerful weapon which creates a 'new type of destruction' never seen before.
Currently, there are no labeling requirements for you to tell if a product contains weaponized nanoparticles. 
Nanotechnology is often referred to as a “dual-use” technology in that most of the legitimate uses of the technology could also be misappropriated.
The US, Russia, China, Iran and other countries are escalating the integration of nanotechnology at an alarming rate. Traditional international biological and chemical treaties have holes in them which can be exploited. Proponents for nanotechnology are advocating a 'whole-community' approach to get an unsuspecting public to embrace the technology through 'responsible research' and innovation involving researchers, citizens, policy makers and organizations working together to improve research and innovation outcomes aligning with global societal values and expectations.
Nanotechnology is a weapon.  It is probably not on your radar.  This technology is so threatening you best learn about what you can do to protect yourself and your loved ones.  Mitigation is in its infancy but there are ways you can utilize to reduce your vulnerability.
[*]Marcus, L. (2017, March/April). A new chapter in warfare: Technological breakthroughs contributed to making World War I the first modern war. Library of Congress Magazine, 6(2), 8-9. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/lcm/pdf/LCM_2017_0304.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]ETC Group. (2010, Dec. 16). The big downturn? Nanogeopolitics. (Rep.). Author. Retrieved from http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/pdf_file/nano_big4web.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Nanowerk News. (2015, Jan. 30). Nanotechnology and nanomaterials for camouflage and stealth applications. Retrieved from http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=38899.php (accessed April 12, 2017).
[*]Malsch, I., & Frueland Anderson, A. (2011, April 20). Ethical and societal aspects of nanotechnology enabled ICT and security technologies (Rep.). ObservatoryNano. Retrieved from http://keen-regions.venetoinnovazione.it/sites/default/files/Nanoelectronics_ICT_Security_report.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Sandberg, A., & Bostrom, N. (2008). Global catastrophic risks survey (pp. 1-5, Tech. Rep. No. 2008-1). Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University. Retrieved from https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008-1.pdf  (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Gsponer, A. (2002, October-November). From the lab to the battlefield? Nanotechnology and fourth-generation nuclear weapons. Disarmament Diplomacy, (67). Retrieved from http://www.acronym.org.uk/old/archive/textonly/dd/dd67/67op1.htm (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. (2012). Security implications of synthetic biology and nanobiotechnology: A risk and response assessment of advances in biotechnology (Rep.) Retrieved from praise GOD.unicri.it/in_focus/files/UNICRI 2012 Security Implications of Synthetic Biology and Nanobiotechnology Final Public-1.pdf]http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/files/UNICRI%202012%20Security%20Implications%20of%20Synthetic%20Biology%20and%20Nanobiotechnology%20Final%20Public-1.pdf[/url] (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Taylor, J. D. (2009, April 21). U.S. Patent No. 7,520,224 B2. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
[*]Nanosteel. (n.d.). New class of steel. Retrieved from https://nanosteelco.com/products/sheet-steel/new-class-of-steel  (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Jeremiah, D. E. (1995, Nov. 9). Nanotechnology and global security. In Fourth Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology. Retrieved from http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/nano4/jeremiahPaper.html (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Nichols, G. (2017). Message from the Science and Technology Advisor. Journal of the Homeland Defense & Security Information Analysis Center, (Special Nanotechnology Issue), 4-5. Retrieved from https://www.hdiac.org/system/files/HDIAC_Journal_Special_Nanotechnology_Issue.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, MIT. (n.d.). What is the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies? Retrieved from http://isnweb.mit.edu/what-is-isn.html (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Chandler, D. L. (2016, April 1). New institute will accelerate innovations in fibers and fabrics. MIT News Office. Retrieved from http://news.mit.edu/2016/national-public-private-institute-innovations-fibers-fabrics-0401 (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Pellerin, C. (2016, Oct. 31). Deputy Secretary: Third Offset Strategy bolsters America’s military deterrence. U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved from https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/991434/deputy-secretary-third-offset-strategy-bolsters-americas-military-deterrence? (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Dong, H., Gao, Y., Sinko, P. J., Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Jia, L. (2016, April 12). The nanotechnology race between China and USA. Retrieved from http://www.materialstoday.com/nanomaterials/comment/the-nanotechnology-race-between-china-and-usa/ (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Bailin, S. (1998). Nanotechnology weapons on future battlefields. In Chinese views of future warfare (pp. 413-420). Washington, DC: National Defence University Press. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/139710/1998-09_Chinese_View_Future_Warfare_40-Chap.pdf (accessed April 14, 2017).
[*]McGuinness, J. P. (2005, January). Nanotechnology: The next Industrial Revolution - Military and societal implications (AEPI and USAWC Research Paper, Army Environmental Policy Institute, 2005). Arlington, VA.
[*]Appelbaum, R. P., & Parker, R. A. (2008, June). China's bid to become a global nanotech leader: advancing nanotechnology through state-led programs and international collaborations. Science and Public Policy, 35(5), 319-334. doi:10.3152/030234208x319366
[*]Rusnano. (n.d.). Rusnano Corporation. Retrieved from http://en.rusnano.com/about (accessed April 12, 2017).
[*]European Commission. (2016, Sept. 10). Russia’s advanced research foundation advancing as an answer to US DARPA. Retrieved from http://idstch.com/home5/international-defence-security-and-technology/industry/russia-s-advanced-research-foundation-advancing-as-an-answer-to-us-darpa/ (accessed April 12, 2017).
[*]International Defence, Security & Technology. (2007, Sept. 11). Russian military uses nanotechnology to build world's most powerful non-nuclear bomb. Retrieved from http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=2546.php (accessed April 12, 2017).
[*]UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO science report: Towards 2030 (Rep.). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235406e.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Mehr News Agency. (2016, Dec. 24). Iran ranks 6th in nanoscience production. Mehr News Agency. Retrieved from http://en.mehrnews.com/news/122251/Iran-ranks-6th-in-nanoscience-production  (accessed April 12, 2017).
[*]Nasu, H., & Faunce, T. (2010). Nanotechnology and the international law of weaponry: Towards international regulation of nano-weapons. Journal of Law, Information and Technology, 20, 21-54. Retrieved from http://www.isodarco.it/courses/andalo13/doc/Nano-and-IL-2010-Article.pdf (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Wallach, E. J. (2010). A tiny problem with huge implications - Nanotech agents as enablers or substitutes for banned chemical weapons: Is a new treaty needed? Fordham International Law Journal, 33(3), 858. Retrieved from http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2198&context=ilj (accessed April 13, 2017).
[*]Nasu, H. (2015). Nanotechnology and the future of the law of weaponry. International Law Studies, 91, 486-516. Retrieved from http://stockton.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1408&context=ils (accessed April 14, 2017).
[*]Partnership for Peace Consortium (2013, Nov. 13). Emerging security challenges: Issues and options for consideration (Policy brief 1).
[*]European Commission. (n.d.). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation (accessed April 12, 2017).
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Currently, there are no labeling requirements for you to tell if a product contains weaponized nanoparticles.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Eligibility Requirements
» Additional technical document or post-qualification requirements other than stated in the IRR
» Fixed Eligibility Requirements for Alternative Methods of Procurement
» other requirements for public bidding
» Requirements for Awarding of Contract

Permissions in this forum:You can reply to topics in this forum
Watcher Forum :: Welcome! :: General Discussion-
Post new topic   Reply to topicJump to: