The Chinese-UN Occupation of America Is Taking Shape

[size=32]Asian man arrested driving car with People’s Armed Police markings; second vehicle sought

Quote :

Police in California are investigating at least two cases of people posing as Chinese police driving cars with markings of the Communist Party of China’s People’s Armed Police (PAP).
California Highway Patrol spokesman Florentino Olivera said an Asian man was arrested Sept. 10 after reports he was impersonating a PAP officer while driving a black Audi A4 with PAP markings and a Chinese national symbol.
Photos of the car were posted on the CHP Facebook page with notice that police responded to several complaints regarding a male Asian driver impersonating a PAP officer.
“The driver was arrested and charged with impersonating a peace officer and for forging/possessing a fraudulent public seal,” the notice said.
Police are looking for a second white vehicle also reported to bear PAP markings in the same area of Irvine, Calif. The town’s population is 42 percent Asian American, and many residents are Chinese American.
Prosecutors expect to charge the suspect as if he had impersonated a U.S. police officer. Olivera said the man’s name was withheld at the request of investigators.
“We think there is a bigger case here,” Olivera said in an interview.
No details of the motive for the activities of the person arrested Sept. 10 were provided. Investigators are still looking into whether the impersonators are linked to the Chinese government.
The arrest in southern California comes amid reports of other Chinese police impersonators in Australia, northern California, and Washington state.
Intelligence experts say the activities appear related to covert Chinese government efforts to intimidate overseas Chinese people regarded by Beijing as dissidents or opponents of the Communist Party.
“The circumstances of this case suggest this may be a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act,” said Nicholas Eftimiades, a former Defense Intelligence Agency counterintelligence official.
“There are many examples of China’s Communist Party employing the government or party apparatus to intimidate and coerce ethnic Chinese abroad, whether or not they are Chinese citizens.”
China’s security and intelligence services have in the past conducted covert intelligence operations in the United States.
The operations, code-named Foxhunt by the FBI, targeted dissidents and regime opponents.
A report made public in April by the National Defense University said the PAP may be used by China’s government to protect Chinese civilians and assets abroad.
The PAP is China’s political police and security force. The Chinese Communist Party uses it for political control in addition to its nationwide police functions.
The PAP, which the National Defense University report calls China’s “other army,” has at its disposal large numbers of troops and military forces, including tanks and armored vehicles. It was once under dual civilian and military control but recently was placed directly under the command of the Chinese military as part of a power consolidation bid by Chinese president Xi Jinping.
The PAP is known to use black Audis. The markings on the black car in Irvine read “Special Police” and are similar to SWAT special units that employ even more brutal methods than regular PAP officers. Regular PAP officers usually drive white cars.
Recent images show PAP officers, wearing uniforms with the same Chinese characters for Special Police, herding blindfolded and shackled minority Uighurs into trains.
For overseas Chinese, police cars marked as Special Police would be similar to cars adorned with Nazi SS insignia.
According to KTLA television, which first reported the Irvine arrest, an incident involving Chinese police impersonation took place in northern California earlier last summer.
In that case, an Asian driver of a car with Chinese markings was arrested after attempting to pull over an off-duty police officer.
Reports from Australia in August revealed two cases of Chinese police car impersonators in the cities of Perth and Adelaide.
The Adelaide case involved a white BMW with PAP markings.
Those cases coincided with Chinese government efforts to stem international support for pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, and the same month saw a clash in Adelaide between pro-China protesters and supporters of the Hong Kong protesters.
The Australian Broadcasting Company quoted an Australian member of parliament, Tammy Franks, as saying the law needed to be tightened to outlaw impersonating foreign police.
“It appears that our laws anticipate perhaps somebody impersonating an Australian police car but certainly not a Chinese cop car on the streets of Adelaide,” she told ABC.
Franks said the police car was “potentially intimidating and threatening, particularly ex-pats from China or people from Hong Kong and Taiwan.”
Another explanation for the unusual Chinese police activities is that they may be criminal.
The FBI in Washington state issued a public notice in December warning that people posing as Chinese police were attempting to fleece Chinese students and residents.
The notice said email and text message scams were targeting Chinese nationals on student visas at universities as well as Chinese in the United States on work visas.
The scams netted at least $100,000 each from five people who were told they were under investigation by Chinese authorities for money laundering or other crimes and that they were supposed to send money to Chinese investigators.
The victims were told they could either resolve the crimes by returning to China and going to prison or transferring money to accounts that would be used to analyze proof of their innocence.
A Seattle FBI spokeswoman said the scams were limited to online contacts and did not involve the use of fraudulent Chinese police cars.

Why did China remain isolated?

Quote :

The notion that China is isolated from the world comes from the period from 1950 until 1972. That was when China was isolated and strictly sanctioned by the West and its allies.
China followed its own path of development and find an alternative to the system created by the West dominated by the US.
After 1978, China has followed the policy of opening up to the outside world and modernization initiated by China’s leader Deng Xiaoping. The Cold War ended in 1992 with the demise of USSR. In line with its determination to become a trading nation, China has made friends with all countries regardless of the system.

Quote :

This is written in response to criticisms regarding the article on eminent domain being circulated, entitled: “Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts.”  Whether it is based on information gained or not, the circumstances tie into facts that need to be taken into consideration, and it most likely characterizes reality.  In the least it could be a warning of circumstances which need to be taken into consideration.  The thoughts it evokes is something dreadful, but these possibilities have to be dealt with!   Let’s examine the similarity to the facts:
Things have changed ever since the socialists took over the oval office!  Take for instance, our policy of eminent domain.   The traditional policy in this country used to be that public officials working in government could take control of land held by a private person, and exercise “eminent domain” over such property, provided such action met with certain justified constitutional requirements and public approval.   At least, that was the way it started out — an essential safety benefit and protection of the public.  Then in 2005 the Kelo Decision came before the Supreme Court.  The Court’s decision was that land could be taken from one private owner and given to another private owner, simply on the basis that the new owner would generate more tax revenue.   That unbelievable and unfortunate court decision damaged the original intent of the Bill of Rights affecting man’s sovereignty, his sovereign right to own land, and his right to receive due process.
I recall that while Bill Clinton was president he had some plan going with the Chinese government to start about 8 new Chinese communities in 8 different U.S. states. The idea at that time was to bring in communist Chinese, and their families, into 8 different states to set up new communities.  There was opposition, and as far as I know, the idea is not active, as far as I know.  As I recall, most of the 8 communities, but not all, were designated to be scattered in states comprising the lower half of the U.S.  If that idea ever becomes revived, it will have big help from the Kelo Decision and a lot of condemnation proceedings will be practiced to provide adequate space for these Chinese communities.
Would China be satisfied to get the power of eminent domain as collateral for the new huge loan Sec. of State Hillary Clinton just managed to negotiate?  Hillary was over there. Two public officials were on television a few nights ago, and one of them described Hillary “on her bended knee, begging China to give us another loan“.  China had been unwilling to take on any more of our debts.  The only backing we have for our money is the words “full faith and credit”.  If we collapse because of the poor management and continual over-spending and inflation of this country’s money, where is China’s security for their loan?  What collateral did she come up with?   There has to be some worthwhile collateral for these massive loans being expended to us from a shrewd country, especially on top of what we already owe them. Is it possible that the federal government has already had to put up land as collateral for previous debts?  What else do we have to put up as collateral?  We have no gold.  The federal government holds 50% of the nation’s land, which could be listed as collateral.   We need to ask “WHAT IS the collateral if we should be unable to pay this debt?  The Chinese read the paper and watch TV.  They understand our stock market.   The situation begs the question: “How much of our physical assets has been used as collateral?”  In the least, we should be knowing exactly what the collateral is!  If our money is destroyed by more inflation, or if we go bankrupt, surely the Chinese government is not expecting to recoup their money in payments of “interest due figures”, or wallpaper money.   We realize that much of our land has already been consigned, turned over to the United Nations:  Rivers, national parks, wetlands, Biosphere reserves, Heritages such as Yellowstone National Park, Grand Canyon, Independence Hall, etc., and dozens of other national treasures.  Do we have enough other federal land and sites left to cover for all we are borrowing and spending hand over fist? Or will these huge loans also depend upon our privately owned land?
If you wonder whether it would be possible for privately owned land to be collateralized, remember back a few years ago when the National Association of Realtors’ president (Julio S. Laguarta at the time, and pictured in the article) warned in his speech to the International Real Estate Federation in Toronto, Canada that “Failure to change an official United Nations policy that explicitly opposes the right of private property ownership will ultimately result in the destruction of our industry.”  Mr. Laguarta then criticized the United Nation’s position on “no private ownership of land” as he warned of and quoted the U.N.’s position as follows:
       “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.  Social justice, urban renewal, and development, the provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.“ 
Persons running the upcoming administrations under the “CHANGE” POLICY may be forced to honor the no private ownership of land policy!  Our government as a member of the U.N. has already had to adopt such a policy, even though we are not told about it. This land policy has never been known to have been rescinded.  If there is not enough federal land left to pay off the Federal Reserve, plus all those countries to whom we are now indebted, and especially the gigantic debt we owe China,  our ruling socialist elite may try to pay off the debt by including our land (formerly privately owned) to satisfy the investors!   The money was borrowed in the name of the people of the United States and the money borrowed will have to come from the assets of the people.    It is called a “crash!”
These issues may seem to many people that they cannot happen, but the debt is there and it is real.   We are going to be responsible for it in one way or another.  We need to understand more of the provisions in these loans, and the consequences.  Too few people have no idea that we are not on the gold standard.  FDR took us off the gold standard many many years ago when he called all the gold in to pay other debts.  THERE IS NO GOLD behind our greenbacks!  If we go bankrupt, a different ball game with different rules will be played, especially now that the socialists have taken over our country, and have acquired such world power.  China needs land.  They are looking to gain it.
Please take time to go over these attachments of which there are a number. Wayne Hage’s article is one of the best and is a must read.  Plenty of “sources” listed in there.   I have added check marks on a few of the important facts on some of the papers.
Note that “agencies” appears is some of the articles you are receiving.  “Agencies” are not responsible to the people!  They are outside of and beyond the people’s authority – not beholden to any Constitutional restraint.  They are run by internationalists.  If collateralizing our debts by using our properties seems unreal, then please consider that our presidents don’t always have our best interest at heart.  Ever since Pres. John Kennedy signed the General & Complete Disarmament Law the Congress keeps funding Kennedy’s Public Law 87-297, the law which divests us of our total U.S. national armed forces and transfers them to the United Nations on a permanent basis. We will have no military!  The same law also forbids all law-abiding citizens from owning or having access to a firearm of any kind.
When he was president, George W. Bush instituted a military government under the name Homeland Security “Agency”.  The H.S.A. has merged the military with the civilian law enforcement systems, something never done in a republic, if it is to remain a republic. This altered concept of operation changes the United States from a republic into a dictatorship.  Obama is operating under Presidential Directive Decision 51 (P.D.D. 51) which empowers the president to be a dictator, and supersede the power of the Congress.  These are all just facts. What makes anyone think that we don’t have to examine what is happening, especially when government leaders want to eliminate the Constitution and replace it with an already prepared world government constitution.  Hopefully, this article “Feds Grant Eminent Domain as Collateral to China for U.S. Debts.” will bring people out of their lethargy.
God bless America!

Democracies Still Have Leverage to Shape Beijing’s Reform Agenda