What’s Really Behind New Polls Showing A Majority Of Respondents Support Human-Animal Chimeric Research?

Guest

What’s Really Behind New Polls Showing A Majority Of Respondents Support Human-Animal Chimeric Research?

October 6, 2020 by SkyWatch Editor

By Dr. Thomas R. Horn

Unless you are living in a cave you most likely have seen numerous disturbing headlines over the last week stating that a “Majority of Respondents Support Chimeric Animal Research: Survey.” Later this month I am scheduled to go on the largest Christian network in the world to explain why a strong majority of Americans and global respondents now support the creation of human-animal chimeras as well as other unnatural entities with a full 92% of those polled saying they are also very anxious for Days of Noah “Human Augmentation.”

I plan to point out how, as a result of this emerging bridge between technology and human-animal biology this century, nothing less than the wholesale redesign of mankind, including genetic integration with other life-forms—plants, animals, and synthetic creations—will soon be realized. The vision to borgify (merge human-animal biology and machine) of man was originally supported as far back as the 2010 “State of the Future” report by the global think tank, the Millennium Project, founded after a three-year feasibility study with the United Nations University, Smithsonian Institution, and the Futures Group International, where synthetic biologists affirm that “as computer code is written to create software to augment human capabilities, so too genetic code will be written to create life forms to augment civilization.”[i] As biotech, infotech, nanotech, and cognotech breakthroughs quickly migrate with appropriate synergies to create widespread animal-man-machine adaptation within society, a “global collective intelligence system [hive supermind] will be needed to track all these science and technology advances,” the report goes on to say.

As detailed in the bestselling book The Milieu, I am personally identified by the University of London (in a thesis by Professor S. Jonathon O’Donnell from their Department of Religion and Philosophies) and the peer-reviewed journal Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science as the global leader of the transhuman resistance. I’ve also debated such leading transhumanists as Dr. James Hughes concerning the inevitable techno-sapien future on his weekly syndicated talk show, Changesurfer Radio. Hughes is executive director of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies and teaches at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut. He is the author of Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future, a sort of bible for transhumanist values. Dr. Hughes joins a growing body of academics, bioethicists, and sociologists who support:

Large-scale genetic and neurological engineering of ourselves…[a] new chapter in evolution [as] the result of accelerating developments in the fields of genomics, stem-cell research, genetic enhancement, germ-line engineering, neuro-pharmacology, artificial intelligence, robotics, pattern recognition technologies, and nanotechnology…at the intersection of science and religion [which has begun to question] what it means to be human.[ii]

more @

https://www.skywatchtv.com/2020/10/06/whats-really-behind-new-polls-showing-a-majority-of-respondents-support-human-animal-chimeric-research/