Welcome to Watcher Forum
 
HomeCalendarFAQRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Fukushima - epa change forthcoming

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
AuthorMessage
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:26 pm




CNN: "Japan’s nuclear regulator called Fukushima “a house of horrors”… They are not prone to hyperbole, an unbelievable thing to say — “Very, very serious… incredibly frightening”

Watching the live cam feed after the recent spats of glowing and steam billowing there hasn't much worker or crane movement; indicative of the fact that reactions are taking place off and on again and the workers basically hide in a bunker until it calms down for a bit then head back in to get some work done.
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:02 pm

From today. Inbound on the Jetstream.....the lower isotope releases are bad, the 3 part accordion will bring serious nastiness. 5 to 6 days until the west coast gets this.

 
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:17 am

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/world/asia/nuclear-operator-raises-alarm-on-crisis.html?_r=1&

47 Quadrillion Bq & that's JUST THE CESIUM

That's 10 to the 15th power for those keeping score at home.

Comparatively, a Trillion is 10 to the 12th power

I dusted off an old textbook from Canoe U and couldn't find any scenarios even contemplating such situations. Keep in mind the figure is JUST ONE OF MANY radioactive isotopes emitting radiation.

However, this is all GREAT NEWS!

Revelation 11:18
Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sat Aug 24, 2013 12:42 pm

Lest we forget:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3853864,00.html

Report: Japan offers to enrich uranium for Iran
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sat Aug 24, 2013 12:59 pm

*


Last edited by jem on Mon May 26, 2014 9:55 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sat Aug 24, 2013 5:41 pm

http://watchermeet-up.forumotion.com/t3525-the-number-language-used-by-all-secret-societies

The thought had crossed my mind as well......Japan is made up of 47 Prefectures.

Ironically, the Prefecture effectively killed by this incident is #7

List in Japanese ISO order
[ltr][edit source | editbeta][/ltr]
The prefectures are also often grouped into nine regions (Chihō). Those regions are not formally specified, they do not have elected officials, nor are they corporate bodies. However, the practice of ordering prefectures based on their geographic region is traditional.[1] This ordering is mirrored in Japan's International Organization for Standardization (ISO) coding.[4] From north to south (numbering in ISO 3166-2:JP order), the prefectures of Japan and their commonly associated regions are:
[th]Hokkaido[/th][th]Tōhoku[/th][th]Kantō[/th][th]Chūbu[/th][th]Kansai[/th][th]Chūgoku[/th][th]Shikoku[/th][th]Kyushu[/th][th]Okinawa[/th]
1. Hokkaido2. Aomori
3. Iwate
4. Miyagi
5. Akita
6. Yamagata
7. Fukushima
8. Ibaraki
9. Tochigi
10. Gunma
11. Saitama
12. Chiba
13. Tōkyō
14. Kanagawa
15. Niigata
16. Toyama
17. Ishikawa
18. Fukui
19. Yamanashi
20. Nagano
21. Gifu
22. Shizuoka
23. Aichi
24. Mie
25. Shiga
26. Kyōto
27. Ōsaka
28. Hyōgo
29. Nara
30. Wakayama
31. Tottori
32. Shimane
33. Okayama
34. Hiroshima
35. Yamaguchi
36. Tokushima
37. Kagawa
38. Ehime
39. Kōchi
40. Fukuoka
41. Saga
42. Nagasaki
43. Kumamoto
44. Ōita
45. Miyazaki
46. Kagoshima
47. Okinawa
GROUNDZERO wrote:
47...are you joking me??  Roswell...1947...I can't stop seeing it, now connected to this.



Starts 6:30.
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sun Aug 25, 2013 10:24 am

Concentrations of radioactive tritium in seawater from the port of the stricken Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant have risen between eight and 18 times in one week, Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Aug. 23.

http://enenews.com/contamination-now-spiking-in-seawater-off-fukushima-plant-asahi-reports-up-to-18-fold-increase-in-one-week
 

www.gameover.com

Edit to add: Tritium is caused by active fission of uranium & plutonium if you're keeping track at home. Run, don't walk to the nearest theater exit...this isn't caused by a leaky tank or radioactive trench overflowing. She's a blazin' somewhere because tritium is sneaky and not that prevalent in the process so an increase by this amount ist nicht gut....Also means attributing the 47 quadrillion # is nonsense & isn't from a leaky tank. Liars one and all because a huge jump in tritium is caused by only 1 thing and that's active reaction. (Unless of course they were lying and doing a little bomb building in the basement employee's lounge)

Better yet, don't take my word for it.

"......Tritium is produced during nuclear weapons explosions, as a by product in reactors producing electricity, and in special production reactors, where the isotope lithium-6 is bombarded to produce tritium."

http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/radionuclides/tritium.html#where

What's a 'production reactor' you ask, good question:

"SECTION: Production reactors
The very first nuclear reactors were built for the express purpose of manufacturing plutonium for nuclear weapons, and the euphemism of calling them production reactors has persisted to this day. At present, most of the material produced by such systems is tritium (3H, or T), the fuel for hydrogen bombs. "

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/478026/production-reactor

What kind of reactors were at Fukushima?

GE MARK 1 (first generation reactor)

Fukushima: Mark 1 Nuclear Reactor Design Caused GE Scientist To Quit In Protest
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fukushima-mark-nuclear-reactor-design-caused-ge-scientist/story?id=13141287

"The BWR was developed by the Idaho National Laboratory and General Electric in the mid-1950s."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_water_reactor


Last edited by quietobserver on Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:31 am; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : addl info)
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:50 pm

Not an astro guy so I haven't the slightest. A quadrillion is a million billion. Isn't that a quote from austin powers or something??


GROUNDZERO wrote:
Thx Q for those numbers, please drop them on us when you see them.


BTW 47 Quadrillion...isn't that like more than the amt. of stars in the universe??
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:35 pm

Thanks for the reminder GZ. Abandoned astro very early on when I concluded as a young, hardly educated idiot that they were indoctrinating us all with nonsense and bullshitology.  Men haven't a clue imho.

Read the Bible literally relative astrophysics and a few other issues and you'll just scratch your head. Huh? Bbbut I thought they told me......the great Carl tttthhhhhhsagan.
Back to top Go down
ColonelZ



Posts : 9726
Reputation : 355
Join date : 2013-02-04

PostSubject: FUKUSHIMA: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW   Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:40 am

What is amazing is how many people know little or nothing about Fukushima, Fukushima has become a forgotten incident.....  

FUKUSHIMA: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
 
 
By: Devvy
August 25, 2013
NewsWithViews.com

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster came as a result of the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami on March 11, 2011. A truly horrible disaster almost beyond words. Naturally, it dominated news media, electronic and print, for many weeks. The death and destruction was simply heart wrenching.

After a while, the media moved on to the next "when it bleeds, it leads" story and Fukushima became a forgotten incident. Not for the Japanese people - not after that day and for decades and generations to come. I have prayed for all the lost souls and the citizens over there who will continue to suffer from radiation poisoning - especially children. But, should we be concerned? Has or will the effects of Fukushima hit the U.S.?

A little refresher

"The plant comprised six separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE) and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). At the time of the earthquake, reactor 4 had been de-fueled and reactors 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance. Immediately after the earthquake, the remaining reactors 1–3 shut down automatically and emergency generators came online to power electronics and coolant systems. However, the tsunami following the earthquake quickly flooded the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to the critical pumps that must continuously circulate coolant water through a Generation II reactor for several days to keep it from melting down after shut down. After the pumps stopped, the reactors overheated due to the normal high radioactive decay heat produced in the first few days after nuclear reactor shutdown (smaller amounts of this heat normally continue to be released for years, but are not enough to cause fuel melting).

"As workers struggled to cool and shut down the reactors, several hydrogen-air chemical explosions occurred. It is estimated that the hot zirconium fuel cladding-water reaction in each reactor produced 800 to 1000 kilograms of hydrogen gas, which was vented out of the reactor pressure vessel, and mixed with the ambient air, eventually reaching explosive concentration limits in units 1 and 3, and due to piping connections between units 3 and 4, unit 4 also filled with hydrogen, with the hydrogen-air explosions occurring at the top of each unit, that is in their upper secondary containment building.

"The negative health effects of the Fukushima nuclear disaster include thyroid abnormalities, infertility and an increased risk of cancer. One study found that more than a third (36%) of children in Fukushima Prefecture have abnormal growths in their thyroid glands. Furthermore, a WHO report found that there is a significant increase in the risk of developing cancers for people who live near Fukushima. This includes a 70% higher risk of developing thyroid cancer for newborn babies, a 7% higher risk of leukemia in males exposed as infants, a 6% higher risk of breast cancer in females exposed as infants and a 4% higher risk of developing solid cancers for females. An increase in infertility has also been reported. As of August 2013, there have been more than 40 children newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer and other cancers in Fukushima prefecture alone and nuclear experts warn that this pattern may also occur in other areas of Japan."

While the American media has pretty much ignored what's been going on for the past 2 1/2 years (you might see a headline here and there), a few dedicated web sites have kept a steady stream of updates. For the most comprehensive coverage, go to Rense.com; scroll down to Japan Nuclear Disaster.

Contrary to the few weak statements by the criminal syndicate out in Washington, DC., one journalist recently penned this:

Why the Fukushima disaster is worse than Chernobyl

"Some scientists say Fukushima is worse than the 1986 Chernobyl accident, with which it shares a maximum level-7 rating on the sliding scale of nuclear disasters. One of the most prominent of them is Dr Helen Caldicott, an Australian physician and long time anti-nuclear activist who warns of "horrors to come" in Fukushima.
"Chris Busby, a professor at the University of Ulster known for his alarmist views, generated controversy during a Japan visit last month when he said the disaster would result in more than 1 million deaths. "Fukushima is still boiling its radionuclides all over Japan," he said. "Chernobyl went up in one go. So Fukushima is worse."
On our side of the world, we can still remember the terrible Deepwater Horizon oil platform "spill" in April 2010; eleven died. I won't say accident. To say it was/is a financial as well as ecological disaster is the understatement of the century. Our fellow Americans in the gulf states who depend on fishing and tourism have endured hell for years. After all I have read since that deadly day, I won't eat anything coming out of the Gulf of Mexico. I'm sorry to the fishermen, but it's a choice I've made.

For those who haven't heard what should have lead on all major boob tube channels and cable news networks, here's an update:

"In November 2012, BP and the United States Department of Justice settled federal criminal charges with BP pleading guilty to 11 counts of manslaughter, two misdemeanors, and a felony count of lying to Congress. BP also agreed to four years of government monitoring of its safety practices and ethics, and the Environmental Protection Agency announced that BP would be temporarily banned from new contracts with the US government. BP and the Department of Justice agreed to a record-setting $4.525 billion in fines and other payments but further legal proceedings not expected to conclude until 2014 are ongoing to determine payouts and fines under the Clean Water Act and the Natural Resources Damage Assessment. As of February 2013, criminal and civil settlements and payments to a trust fund had cost the company $42.2 billion."

A money plea deal. When the DA pleads out a case for manslaughter, how many times have you heard the guilty party pay to stay out of prison? When you're charged with and plead guilty to manslaughter, the convicted almost always get jail time unless there's some unusual circumstances. Certainly, the fines for BP are a ton of money, but in the oil business, it's really, well, just the cost of doing business. Money talks. In this case, it also buys your way out of jail.

I bring up the Deepwater disaster because the same applies to Fukushima. Here's but a small sample of what we all need to know:

“Absolutely Every One” – 15 Out of 15 – Bluefin Tuna Tested In California Waters Contaminated with Fukushima Radiation. That was in 2012. With Fukushima pouring 300 TONS of contaminated water into the ocean EVERY day, what does current testing show for Bluefin tuna and other species of popular fish? The American people have the right to know, even if the news is bad.

Holy Fukushima – Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans(May 2013) (Be sure to look at the graphic image of Radioactive Seawater Impact Map)
"This isn't a conspiracy theory, this is happening and it's happening right now.
"The fancy little picture at the top of the article isn't showing you the flow of happy fun time thoughts from Japan back in March of 2012, it's showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant after the devastating earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Yes, that sharp pain you just felt in your chest is the sudden realization that the image shows the radiation reaching almost past Hawaii more than a year ago.

"Do the math – If that radiation screamed across the Pacific Ocean that far in one year, just how far do you think it has gotten since then? Look at what World Truth TV is saying and then you decide.

Samples of milk taken across the United States have shown radiation at levels 2000 percent higher than EPA maximums. The reason that milk is so significant is that it is representative of the entire food supply. According to an article published on Natural News, “Cows consume grass and are exposed to the same elements as food crops and water supplies. In other words, when cows’ milk starts testing positive for high levels of radioactive elements, this is indicative of radioactive contamination of the entire food supply.”

"The Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Deception Protection Agency, instead of refusing to prohibit the sale of tainted foods and mandatory testing of foods produced and harvested from the Pacific Coast, have simply raised the “acceptable levels” of radioactive material in foods." (The column above gives excellent suggestions about purchasing seafood from here on out.)

Fukushima: 300 tons of radioactive water leak everyday (August 2013)

"In the weeks after the disaster, the government allowed Tepco to dump tens of thousands of tonnes of contaminated water into the Pacific in an emergency move. But the escalation of the crisis raises the risk of an even longer and more expensive clean-up, already forecast to take more than 40 years and cost $11 billion. The admission further dents the credibility of Tepco, criticized for its failure to prepare for the tsunami and earthquake, for a confused response to the disaster and for covering up shortcomings. "We think that the volume of water (leaking into the Pacific) is about 300 tonnes a day," said Yushi Yoneyama, an official with the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, which oversees energy policy."

Tritium soaring in water at No. 1 plant (July 2013)
"A Nuclear Regulation Authority official recently said contaminated groundwater from the plant, which is being fed cooling water from outside, may be seeping into the ocean and that the matter must be addressed carefully because data is limited."

There's no maybe about it:

Deadly Radioactive Groundwater Pours Into The Pacific (July 2013): " The Nuclear Regulation Authority said Wednesday it strongly suspects highly radioactive water at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant is seeping into the ground and contaminating the Pacific Ocean."

• Radiation Expert: Enormous amount of contamination flowing from Fukushima will probably imperil entire Pacific Ocean — Threatens other countries, food chain — Absolutely can reach U.S. and Canadian shore (August 2013)
• Airborne Radiation Spread – The facts with Marco Kaltofen
• "Tepco Has Lost Control" - What Is Really Happening At Fukushima In Four Charts (August 2013)

Seeping into the ocean and carried airborne.

Fukushima Nuclear Radiation in California Dairy Products. This is an important column because it deals with testing being done by The Nuclear Engineering Department at UC-Berkeley. The piece isn't dated, so I'm not sure how old the data is, but the results are encouraging.

In that we are dealing with science, this piece speaks for itself. It's important to get opinions from credible sources: Shameful “Study” Claims Fukushima Radiation Affected US Babies

We've seen debris washing up on U.S. soil:

• Japanese tsunami debris makes its way into Hawaiian birds (March 2013)
• Radioactive Debris Washing Up on Pacific Coast (Debris field the size of California)
• Japan Tsunami Debris Confirmed in California (April 2013)

The bottom line is TEPCO's gross ineptness in dealing with Fukushima since day one borders on criminal. At least after the Chernobyl meltdown, the damaged reactors were enclosed in a large concrete sarcophagus fairly quickly, although so many died. TEPCO has made a mess of "fixing it" from day one. It's not getting better and likely reaching a critical point of no return.

As someone who eats a lot of fish, I have kept current on Fukushima. It has caused me to closely scrutinize where any fish is coming from - particularly the Pacific Ocean. I've had to stop eating my favorite prawns and salmon unless I know for sure where it was caught. After Fukushima, I started researching farm raised salmon. Uh, uh, no thanks:

• "Farm-Raised" is Farmed and Dangerous" - Prime Seafood
• How Farm-Raised Salmon Are Turning Our Oceans Into Dangerous and Polluted Feedlots
• First Global Sampling Study Reveals Health Risks Associated with Consuming Farm Raised Salmon
• Norway Issues Warnings About Health Dangers of Farmed Salmon

Most of the time, I just go without because I won't ignore what's right in front of my face. Everyone should be very concerned about what is going on in the Pacific Ocean. The toxic water coming out of Fukushima for the past 2 1/2 years is most definitely harming our beautiful oceans and marine life.

When you order fish at a restaurant, ask where it came from and does that restaurant test for radiation considering what's already been found off the coast of California? You can bet a restaurant in NY is going to say, they don't know anything about it. Perhaps all their fish comes from the Atlantic, but not likely. My heart breaks for our fishing families, which I have always supported. If (more probably when) the many popular fish species become more and more contaminated, it will have a huge, negative impact on commercial and family owned fishing businesses. More tragedy.

Our oceans provide us with so many wonderful things besides beautiful mammals, heavenly beaches and delicious fish of all kinds for consumption. They also provide critical plant life. Too many do not appreciate the importance of all sea life. It is criminal what's going on and has been going on for the past 2 1/2 years. We simply cannot ignore the damage done and what is underway for a long time to come.

Everyone needs to be aware of the fall out from Fukushima. If you live in California, Oregon, Washington State or Canada (Pacific side), you need to contact your state representative and ask if your state's health department is monitoring and testing things like fish, water, soil and air samples. Is your state working with big universities like UC Berkeley in their monitoring and testing? What are the results? Why isn't more being publicized to the citizens of those states -- especially farmers? Is river water being tested on a regular basis? Where are the PSA's (Public Service Announcements) warning the citizens of those states about radiation contamination -- especially for pregnant women or moms breast feeding?

This is nothing to smirk at and it's certainly not some 'flaky' issue. Out of sight, out of mind might seem like a good idea, but a lot of suffering has been going on since that earthquake and subsequent tsunami 2 1/2 years ago and now it's here on our shores.While the Poltroon who represents you in the U.S. House is in your district from now until Sept. 6th, send a fax or call and ask them what they're doing about holding TEPCO accountable for this disaster that is affecting the U.S. From the cost of cleaning up the debris from Fukushima to contamination of water supplies and the ocean - what the hell is TEPCO doing about getting some experts to get that plant contained once and for all? Tell the dope who represents you in the U.S. House: TEPCO has not been able to contain Fukushima after more than two years. Their disaster is becoming ours and will likely get worse. Put pressure on them.
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
ColonelZ



Posts : 9726
Reputation : 355
Join date : 2013-02-04

PostSubject: In Place and Waiting   Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:27 am

Are the six reactors of Fukushima the substance of the Wormwood prophecy? 

In Place and Waiting
 
By Ron Hardin




While reading the Bible, have you ever noticed how God will cause events, examples and prophesies to be repeated? Take the book of Daniel, for instance. The end-times prophecy foretold there is repeated in the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. Also, the figure of Moses is a Christ like figure leading Israel out of the land of bondage as Christ leads us from the bondage of sin. Joseph saves his people through the trials prepared by God just as Christ has saved us while enduring the trials of the cross.

God has revealed Himself over and over again in His holy Word. He has revealed Himself over and over again in the Old Testament though the various leaders that saved His people to the One Stone who came but was rejected to become the cornerstone.

In Jonathan Chan’s book The Harbinger, this theme of repetition of warnings is detailed. My point here is God will repeat Himself to make His intentions known, as well as, demonstrate His desire that none should parish.

A well-known author and TV evangelist proposed via his DVD series on the end-times, that there exists a link between the seals, trumpets and bowl judgments with events that both HAVE and will occur. The evangelist claims that we are well into the trumpet judgments by linking the prophecy of Revelation 8:10-11 to the Chernobyl nuclear accident. I believe that this is a reasonable assertion, but falls short of the trumpet judgment described in those verses.

I began this short article by stating that God will repeat events, examples and prophecies to bring us to understanding and repentance. We are such a recalcitrant people need you wonder why? My proposal here is that the linkage between the Chernobyl accident and the verses of Revelation 8 is indeed valid, but is the first event that will be repeated in a similar fashion to what God prophesied through John in the book of Revelation. I encourage you to stop and read the article pointed to by the following link. See: Nuclear Apocalypse.

What this article makes clear is that we are nearing an event that could possibly result in a GSE, (a Gamma Shine Event), similar to the GRB generated by an imploding supernova, but not on the same scale. Yet, because of the amount of fissionable material present at the site, I have concluded that the mass to energy conversion would blast significant amounts of material into near earth orbit only to rain death down upon the planet.

Let me step back a minute. To summarize the article (for those who have not read it) the Fukushima nuclear accident is far worse and continues to get more severe than what has been previously disclosed or thought. The article makes it clear that the potential remedies for the degrading site can introduce a chain reaction of unknown strength. It also makes clear that to do nothing is not an option. And lastly, the author indicates that those currently addressing the problem are outside their depth and in uncharted territory.

My conclusion is this: The six reactors of Fukushima are the substance of the Wormwood prophecy. That there is enough fissionable material on site, (100 tons under building 4 plus 1300 spent fuel rods in the storage pools atop each of the six buildings) to supply an enormous nuclear explosion should they go critical. Just with the 100 tons of material that rest as a melted blob under building 4, the E=mc2 energy mass conversion equation yields an incomprehensible amount of energy. Sufficient, I believe to launch deadly material in near earth orbit. This material would appear as shooting stars to those who are positioned over the horizon from the blast. In effect, this is exactly what is prophesied in Revelation 8:10-11.

To continue with my conclusion, I believe the disaster is a certainty. I think that this disaster is in the very near future. And I believe that identifying it and linking it to the Revelation 8:10-11 prophesy indicates how near the Lord’s return is...I urge you to speak to those in your family, circle of friends, those whom you meet, those around you...about the Lord’s imminent return and the salvation that is found in accepting His sacrifice.

Yours in Christ,
Ron
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:43 am

Interesting & he doesn't even mentioning the Wormwood Forest.
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:30 pm

1,2 & 3 were producing electricity. 4 was storing fuel. 5 & 6 were claimed to be in "cold shutdown" for maintenance not generating electricity. Partially true. All the science indicates 5 & 6 were generating weapon's grade material from the spent fuel in 4. Those were Mark 1 GE reactors, i.e. the original nuclear reactor. They were originally coined "production reactors" because that's what they did, produced weapons grade material.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/478026/production-reactor

What the American public needs to find out is how much devils dust (Pluto-nium) is in the floating debris field and how many uranium buckyballs are bobbing around in it as well. When that stuff washes up in Malibu our economy says "sayonara". Its a 'round' world and what went around in '47 is coming back over real soon.

Stock up on baking soda, Epsom salts, Sea salt (not table salt). Stuff is next to free now and next to impossible to find it when you'll need it.



GROUNDZERO wrote:
My conclusion is this: The six reactors of Fukushima are the substance of the Wormwood prophecy. That there is enough fissionable material on site, (100 tons under building 4 plus 1300 spent fuel rods in the storage pools atop each of the six buildings) to supply an enormous nuclear explosion should they go critical. Just with the 100 tons of material that rest as a melted blob under building 4, the E=mc2 energy mass conversion equation yields an incomprehensible amount of energy. Sufficient, I believe to launch deadly material in near earth orbit. This material would appear as shooting stars to those who are positioned over the horizon from the blast. In effect, this is exactly what is prophesied in [url=http://biblia.com/bible/kjv1900/Revelation 8.10-11]Revelation 8:10-11[/url][url=libronixdls|ref=[en]bible:Revelation8.10-11|res=LLS:KJV][/url].


Sounds like direct confirmation of the 1/3 of the waters ...
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:41 pm

GZ:

"FAT MAN", detonated over Nagasaki was a plutonium bomb. A prototype, early version Mark I reactor produced the plutonium that was used in "FAT MAN". Same concept, devils dust hasn't changed in 70 years.
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 4:35 pm

M4.7 - 93km E of Namie, Japan 2013-08-27 17:09:25 UTC
Event Time

  1. 2013-08-27 17:09:25 UTC
  2. 2013-08-28 02:09:25 UTC+09:00 at epicenter
  3. 2013-08-27 13:09:25 UTC-04:00 system time

Location
37.595°N 142.049°E depth=50.9km (31.7mi)
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000jc9p#summary

Underground Nuclear test? NO, another underground corium explosion. Thought I'd illustrate instead of 'take my word for it'. 

You can literally trace that 'blob' of corium earthquake-wise all the way back to the plant over the last 900 days. Every time it heats up a little too much, pop goes the weasel.
Back to top Go down
researcher
moderator


Posts : 3213
Reputation : 358
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 64
Location : San Diego

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:14 pm

And now for something a bit different . . . SHUDDER!!! affraid 

Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
Done



Posts : 681
Reputation : 14
Join date : 2012-01-10
Age : 58
Location : Pensacola, FL

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:12 pm

GROUNDZERO wrote:
My conclusion is this: The six reactors of Fukushima are the substance of the Wormwood prophecy. That there is enough fissionable material on site, (100 tons under building 4 plus 1300 spent fuel rods in the storage pools atop each of the six buildings) to supply an enormous nuclear explosion should they go critical. Just with the 100 tons of material that rest as a melted blob under building 4, the E=mc2 energy mass conversion equation yields an incomprehensible amount of energy. Sufficient, I believe to launch deadly material in near earth orbit. This material would appear as shooting stars to those who are positioned over the horizon from the blast. In effect, this is exactly what is prophesied in [url=http://biblia.com/bible/kjv1900/Revelation 8.10-11]Revelation 8:10-11[/url][url=libronixdls|ref=[en]bible:Revelation8.10-11|res=LLS:KJV][/url].


Sounds like direct confirmation of the 1/3 of the waters ...
I think you may have something there my friend?



  1. Ezekiel 12:25
  2. 25 ‘“For I myself, Jehovah, shall speak what word I shall speak, and it will be Done
  3. From the first Bible I ever read.





Back to top Go down
Done



Posts : 681
Reputation : 14
Join date : 2012-01-10
Age : 58
Location : Pensacola, FL

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Tue Aug 27, 2013 6:50 pm

U.S. flies nuke-capable B-52 bombers over South Korea

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/03/20/asia-pacific/u-s-flies-nuke-capable-b-52-bombers-over-south-korea/



  1. Ezekiel 12:25
  2. 25 ‘“For I myself, Jehovah, shall speak what word I shall speak, and it will be Done
  3. From the first Bible I ever read.





Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:00 pm

GZ & I have yapped back and forth over the possibility for a couple years now. It doesn't take too much web surfing to see that there have been countless people having the same discussion as well. Most of those groups of people don't have paths that cross or discussions with one another. Ironically, when Chernobyl blew Ronald Reagan actually thought at the time it might have been "Wormwood" since Chernobyl translated from Ukranian to English is synonymous with wormwood. I bring this up because sadly yet ironically, it was the USS Ronald Reagan that inadvertently sailed into a direct Gamma Shine from Fukushima while rushing to the 'aid' of the Japanese people (and our own). I think Spring posted a video of it awhile back. Most of the sailors who were top deck at the time are now sick and dying, but getting top shelf treatment from their local VA Hospital (sorrowful sarcasm).

GZ's conclusion could be correct even IF all 6 reactors were functioning normally in electricity generation. However; it is now abundantly clear that only 1,2, & 3 were generating electricity. Forget about any & all conspiracies and alleged hogwash and nonsense (true or otherwise) for a minute.

 There is only ONE scientific explanation for the incredible amounts of Tritium the plant is now leaking. The Japanese were telling the truth when they said units 5 & 6 were not generating electricity at the time of the event because units 5 & 6 had clearly been modified to produce weapons material. The Japanese were trying to mask this by spraying boron after the event to actually produce tritium. But there are 0 other answers as to why the Tritium levels are where they're at now. I've read a few of the conspiracy theories about weapon making in the basement, stuxnet afflicted centrifuges, and other strange theories that I personally reserved judgement on; but while they were inaccurate and virtually 100% guesswork in drawing their conclusions I'm 100% confident at this point they were correct in the fact that the Japanese had built a little toy factory for the MIC.

I'm now guessing a bit but its also been insinuated to me that the reason the Reagan sailed flank speed into a Gamma shine was because we were trying to get as many reactor qualified personnel on site as quickly as possible to 'assist' in disaster prevention and or mitigation. The Japanese didn't need expertise to assist with units 1-4, they needed assistance keeping 5 & 6 from spitting the bed. Unfortuneately the help didn't make it. I'm guessing putting them on a chopper would have drawn too much attention and blown the 'humanitarian mission' cover.

Done wrote:
GROUNDZERO wrote:
My conclusion is this: The six reactors of Fukushima are the substance of the Wormwood prophecy. That there is enough fissionable material on site, (100 tons under building 4 plus 1300 spent fuel rods in the storage pools atop each of the six buildings) to supply an enormous nuclear explosion should they go critical. Just with the 100 tons of material that rest as a melted blob under building 4, the E=mc2 energy mass conversion equation yields an incomprehensible amount of energy. Sufficient, I believe to launch deadly material in near earth orbit. This material would appear as shooting stars to those who are positioned over the horizon from the blast. In effect, this is exactly what is prophesied in [url=http://biblia.com/bible/kjv1900/Revelation 8.10-11]Revelation 8:10-11[/url][url=libronixdls|ref=[en]bible:Revelation8.10-11|res=LLS:KJV][/url].


Sounds like direct confirmation of the 1/3 of the waters ...
I think you may have something there my friend?
Back to top Go down
Dove



Posts : 1436
Reputation : 181
Join date : 2011-08-18

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:09 pm

I was going to stop by this thread earlier to plead the case for recognizing "wormwood' here,
but ya'll already have it well covered.  Awe...some!


Rejoice evermore. Pray without ceasing. In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
1Thessalonians 5:16 -18
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:13 pm

Good point. Altered the title to see if you have any takers....righton 


Dove wrote:
I was going to stop by this thread earlier to plead the case for recognizing "wormwood' here,
but ya'll already have it well covered.  Awe...some!
Back to top Go down
researcher
moderator


Posts : 3213
Reputation : 358
Join date : 2011-08-13
Age : 64
Location : San Diego

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:19 pm

I've noticed that you alter the title often as new data becomes available. Great idea. Keeps the latest in front of our eyeballs and keeps everything neatly in one topic thread. Easier to find earlier history that way too. UP UP
Back to top Go down
Dove



Posts : 1436
Reputation : 181
Join date : 2011-08-18

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:25 pm

quietobserver wrote:
Good point. Altered the title to see if you have any takers....righton 


Dove wrote:
I was going to stop by this thread earlier to plead the case for recognizing "wormwood' here,
but ya'll already have it well covered.  Awe...some!
Oh.  Neat!  But it's not like I can prove it!  Laughing
I felt it was more a Divinely provided signpost adjustment or refinement
for us Pilgrims walking the 'endtimes' road.


Rejoice evermore. Pray without ceasing. In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
1Thessalonians 5:16 -18
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 3:32 pm

And like a fine Swiss timepiece.......we're lit up like the 4th of July
(5 days to get here, 1 day to disperse nationwide that's today)

[th]List of RADCON-5 sites:[/th]
4:302 near Washington, D. C., DC, US1192013-08-28 12:20:00A
4:308 near Charlotte, NC, US1302013-08-28 13:13:00A
5:308 near Charlotte, NC, US2982013-08-28 13:13:00A
4:321 near Dover, DE, US1142013-08-28 13:09:00A
4:429 near Augusta, GA, US2832013-08-28 12:38:00A
[th]List of RADCON-4 sites:[/th]
5:107 near Concord, NH, US3862013-08-28 07:04:00U
4:111 near Worcester, MA, US2342013-08-28 13:31:00G
5:111 near Worcester, MA, US4752013-08-28 13:31:00G
4:211 near Edison, NJ, US912013-08-28 13:06:00U
4:301 near Baltimore, MD, US1272013-08-28 12:42:00U
5:301 near Baltimore, MD, US2532013-08-28 12:42:00U
5:302 near Washington, D. C., DC, US2552013-08-28 12:20:00G
5:306 near Richmond, VA, US3062013-08-28 10:33:00G
5:311 near Philadelphia, PA, US2392013-08-28 13:46:00G
5:319 near Harrisonburg, VA, US4442013-08-28 11:59:00G
5:321 near Dover, DE, US2522013-08-28 13:09:00G
5:410 near Knoxville, TN, US3582013-08-28 08:43:00G
5:423 near Birmingham, AL, US2542013-08-28 11:43:00U
4:424 near Raleigh, NC, US2112013-08-28 10:41:00G
5:424 near Raleigh, NC, US5372013-08-28 10:41:00G
4:517 near Grand Rapids, MI, US1672013-08-28 13:38:00G
5:533 near Duluth, MN, US2312013-08-28 13:12:00G
5:606 near Bismarck, ND, US4092013-08-28 13:07:00G
5:613 near Shreveport, LA, US2842013-08-28 13:30:00G
4:707 near Dallas, TX, US2572013-08-28 13:28:00G
5:725 near Mason City, IA, US4412013-08-28 11:34:00G
5:801 near Denver, CO, US4732013-08-28 12:30:00U
5:813 near Rapid City, SD, US4002013-08-28 14:09:00G
5:908 near Seattle, WA, US1332013-08-28 13:54:00G





quietobserver wrote:
From today. Inbound on the Jetstream.....the lower isotope releases are bad, the 3 part accordion will bring serious nastiness. 5 to 6 days until the west coast gets this.

 
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
Dove



Posts : 1436
Reputation : 181
Join date : 2011-08-18

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:27 pm

GROUNDZERO wrote:
Thx Dove...but don't stop there...everybody pray on it and come back with scripture to back it up or tear it down. I've felt this since the beginning...stars are "nuclear" in nature. So a star falling to earth...no-brainer for me. (hello...a real star wouldn't hit the earth...so it must be representative)
Yes.  Representative.  And I did want to qualify what I said if I even can, because
I don't believe in getting 'footloose' with scripture, ever.
But stars aren't always stars in the Bible.

Deu 29:18Lest there should be 3426 among you man 376, or woman 802, or family 4940, or tribe 7626, whose heart 3824 turneth away 6437 this day 3117 from the LORD 3068 our God 430, to go 3212 [and] serve 5647 the gods 430 of these nations 1471; lest there should be 3426 among you a root 8328 that beareth 6509 gall 7219 and wormwood 3939;
Pro 5:4But her end 319 is bitter 4751 as wormwood 3939, sharp 2299 as a twoedged 6310 sword 2719.
Jer 9:15Therefore thus saith 559 the LORD 3068 of hosts 6635, the God 430 of Israel 3478; Behold, I will feed 398 them, [even] this people 5971, with wormwood 3939, and give them water 4325 of gall 7219 to drink 8248.
Jer 23:15Therefore thus saith 559 the LORD 3068 of hosts 6635 concerning the prophets 5030; Behold, I will feed 398 them with wormwood 3939, and make them drink 8248 the water 4325 of gall 7219: for from the prophets 5030 of Jerusalem 3389 is profaneness 2613 gone forth 3318 into all the land 776.
Lam 3:15He hath filled 7646 me with bitterness 4844, he hath made me drunken 7301 with wormwood 3939.
Lam 3:19Remembering 2142 mine affliction 6040 and my misery 4788, the wormwood 3939 and the gall 7219.
Amo 5:7Ye who turn 2015 judgment 4941 to wormwood 3939, and leave off 3240 righteousness 6666 in the earth 776,
Rev 8:11And 2532 the name 3686 of the star 792 is called 3004 Wormwood 894: and 2532 the third part 5154 of the waters 5204 became 1096 1519 wormwood 894; and 2532 many 4183 men 444 died 599 of 1537 the waters 5204, because 3754 they were made bitter 4087
In Rev. 8:11   "water" [Strong's G5204]
a) of water in rivers, in fountains, in pools
b) of the water of the deluge
c) of water in any of the earth's repositories
d) of water as the primary element, out of and through which the world that was before the deluge, arose and was compacted
e) of the waves of the sea
f) fig. used of many peoples

Wormwood [Strong's G894]  [Greek: apsinthion]
1) wormwood
2) the name of a star which fell into the waters and made them bitter

Thayer's Lexicon:  "is given as the proper name of the star that fell into the
waters and made them bitter".

From the OT, wormwood [Strong's H3939] 
1) wormwood
a) bitterness (metaph.)
Appears one time as Hemlock.

The unused root of the word means to curse.
~~~~
In present day it is often equated with absinthe.
Absinthe Alcohol was invented in 1797 by Dr. Pierre Ordinaire. By the 1800's it quickly became one of Europe's most popular alcoholic drinks. France led the way and it was referred to as La fée verte (the green fairy). Authors and artists such as Van Gogh were proponents for using the alcohol to induce creativity and its popularity soared. It is an emerald green alcoholic drink that contains a reportedly psychoactive chemical derived from the herb absinthin (wormwood). It is very bitter (due to the presence of absinthin) and is therefore traditionally poured over a perforated spoonful of sugar into a glass of water. The drink then turns into an opaque white as the essential oils precipitate out of the alcoholic solution."


It's reported to have psychoactive properties.



From wiki:
A Dictionary of The Holy Bible states, "the star called Wormwood seems to denote a mighty prince, or power of the air, the instrument, in its fall."



"
One interesting theory is that nuclear weaponry could be called wormwood. For example: Ukrainian synonymy 'wormwood'. They do poison the water where they are detonated, thus explaining the correlation. Some[12] even point to the Chernobyl disaster as a possible fulfillment of this prophecy, as the name Chernobyl is said to translate to "wormwood."[13]


Rejoice evermore. Pray without ceasing. In every thing give thanks: for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.
1Thessalonians 5:16 -18
Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:25 pm

These are the water levels in the observation holes drilled at Fuku. The ground water levels are now very near the surface. They've successfully created a swamp like everyone said they would. Well done boys.


http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/handouts/2013/images/handouts_130828_09-j.pdf


 

"That’s not a good idea — it’s a poor idea — because what happened is the mountain that’s behind Fukushima continues to pour the water into the ground. Now it’s got no place to go. So now the groundwater’s rising and rising and rising and likely over-topping this wall, certainly going around it on the sides. So we’ve got radioactive water that can no longer be stopped from getting in the ocean.
It’s worse than that though. The radioactive water has made the site seismic response different. The buildings that were on dry land are now on mushy land. So that if there were to be another earthquake, the seismic response of these buildings — which was already marginal — is further compromised because the ground that they are now on is wet soggy soil, when before it had been firm."  - Arnie Gunderson

Arnie was evidently too spooked to use the real term, i.e. liquefaction. Below is a picture from 1964 in Niigata Japan. Just under 100 miles from Fukushima on the west coast of Japan.

Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:34 pm

Anticipated rainfall 4 - 10 inches

Direct hit. Amended Storm Track and reduced severity. Thanks you Lord



Last edited by quietobserver on Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
ColonelZ



Posts : 9726
Reputation : 355
Join date : 2013-02-04

PostSubject: ‘Boiling Sea’ Off Fukushima Viral Photo Of The Day   Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:10 pm

Some good videos......

‘Boiling Sea’ Off Fukushima Viral Photo Of The Day
Friday, August 30, 2013 14:12

(Before It's News)

The sea is boiling off of the coast of Fukushima, Japan and the picture below has been called a viral photo of the day by Coolbuster. Check out the picture, what is that all about? It certainly can’t be good for any plant or animal life left off of the coast of Japan… if this radiation keeps leaking, and there’s no way to stop it, will boiling seas spread all the way across the Pacific Ocean to the West Coast of the United States? If so, what happens then? We are so ‘fuked’. Three brand new video reports below share the Fukushima news that you’re not getting from our government or the mainstream media.



A Twitter photo showing a “boiling sea” off the coast of Japan, near the Fukushima nuclear power plant with radiation leaks, has gone viral online.
So, why is the sea ‘boiling’? The answer can be found on the NaturalNews.com report.

“After a 29-month cover-up, the Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) is now calling for international help and has all but admitted Fukushima’s radiation leaks are spiraling out of control. In addition to the leaking water storage units that are unleashing hundreds of tons of radioactive water each day, Tepco now says 50% of its contaminated water filtration capability has been taken offline due to corrosion,” the news website published Tuesday.

DemocracyNow.org posted that Japan’s nuclear regulator said Wednesday it has officially raised the radioactive water leak severity rating to Level 3 on the international scale for radiological releases.





Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:36 pm

Interesting mix Z. Corium lava eats through reinforced concrete at the rate of 12" to 18" an hour (depending on mix & rebar) so......At the 4 to 5 THOUSAND degrees Fahrenheit a corium blob generates that's not THAT much steam. (Unless of course the corium is well below ground in the water table and that's all the steam that's made its way up for now)






Anyone know where the river went that was diverted when Fuku was built??
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:11 am

MoD serves news outlets with D notice over surveillance leaks
BBC and other media groups issued with D notice to limit publication of information that could 'jeopardise national security'.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/17/defence-d-bbc-media-censor-surveillance-security
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:01 pm

Calmly run to high ground......notice the rather good sized wall that's nearly fully submerged, the black smoke she's now blowing nearly instantaneously, and there is no great calamity prior to the water.

Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:20 pm

No leaks here..



Very very safe thanks to Tyvek, the very same material your mail is shipped in.








And my personal favorite......the French anti-nuke activists seem to think the Datsun they've circled has been illegally parked on site.



 
Back to top Go down
The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:15 pm



Rad suit 'protecting' from 47 quadrillion BcQ, USPS mailer........or stylish wallet!!! I pray for those poor people they've conned into working there.

 



(AMEX not included)
Back to top Go down
ColonelZ



Posts : 9726
Reputation : 355
Join date : 2013-02-04

PostSubject: There Was No 9.0 Earthquake to Cause the Tsunami at Fukushima   Thu Sep 05, 2013 10:30 am

There Was No 9.0 Earthquake to Cause the Tsunami at Fukushima

Posted: March 16, 2013 


This is to permalink an article by Jim Stone at http://www.jimstonefreelance.com

The original Fukushima report is HERE

Two years on, and no one has managed to find a collapsed or leaning building outside the tsunami zone in Sendai, the city hardest hit by a 9.0.

All we have is TSUNAMI DAMAGE. SHOW ME THE EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE. ZERO COLLAPSED AND ZERO LEANING BUILDINGS OUTSIDE THE TSUNAMI ZONE EQUALS NO 9.0, 8.0, OR EVEN A 7.0.

Included in this additional report, posted March 13 2013, I have the OFFICIAL USGS charts that show Sendai, according to the USGS, had peak ground accelerations in excess of 3.7 G´s.

Folks, 0.35 g´s is considered adequate to possibly collapse a skyscraper when it is rated to survive an 8.0, yet the USGS said that INLAND, NORTH OF SENDAI the ground thrust was 12.7 g´s. Sendai proper had, according to the USGS, a MINIMUM G-force exerted on it of 3.7 across every square foot of the city, which is flatulent B.S, and fortunately the Japanese seismic readings farther down this page confirm that nothing on the Japanese mainland ANYWHERE should have fallen, provided it could withstand a 6.7 richter reading, and the REAL maximum ground acceleration ANYWHERE on Japan was in fact below 0.15 g’s. Where did the USGS get 12.7 from? The original charts from both the scamming USGS and the “please help spread the truth” Japanese seismologists are here, right now, on the front page. Compare them, look at the photos of perfectly un damaged Japanese towns and cities as the tsunami arrives, and decide for yourself – WHO IS LYING, THE JAPANESE, OR THE USGS?

After Sandy Hook, do you think ANY mainstream news outlet would tell the truth about this – Japan’s 911? The original Fukushima report laid the scam perpetrated by the USGS bare – the USGS has been usurped by an enemy and is now being used to front phony geological data for political purposes.

The scam of a 9.0 is so transparent that even the smallest kitten scratch on the surface of the topic lays waste to the official story; it takes a real stroke of sheeple style blindness to overlook the fact that it was ALL TSUNAMI DAMAGE because the earthquake never happened as stated at all. And if there was no significant quake, WHERE ON EARTH DID THAT TSUNAMI COME FROM?

THIS is the official USGS quake report, which shows the five top ground accelerations measured, the USGS clearly claims that a peak ground acceleration of 12.7 g’s happened at station MYG004, which is 70 KM inland, yet puts the epicenter out in the ocean, where there are no stations to record it. The station closest to the reported epicenter, which the USGS painstakingly omits, shows that on the Japanese coast nearest the purported “epicenter”, the quake registered a 5.63 on the richter scale which corresponds to a total ground thrust acceleration of approximately 0.08 G’s. Look at this USGS report carefully, which puts the ground acceleration at station MYG004 at over 12 g’s.To put this all in perspective, a quake that produces even 1 g of ground acceleration is considered to be one that virtually NO skyscraper, highway over pass or bridge can survive. Why then did a 12 G monster do virtually nothing at all where it was measured INLAND, FAR AWAY FROM THE OCEAN?

The picture below is NOT the USGS report, CLICK THE LINK ABOVE or Here, the USGS report is a PDF.

Take a look at the REAL richter readings in the photo below, which were provided by the various seismic monitoring agencies in Japan, which prove beyond all doubt the USGS lied.



 
Furthermore, I got numerous shill backstabs claiming that no damage happened inland because the ocean absorbed the quake. If the ocean really could absorb a quake (it cannot) it would be irrelevant if the USGS charts were true, charts which show peak ground accelerations of 12 G’s, 3.18 g’s, and 2.7 g’s, ALL TOTALLY APOCALYPTIC READINGS, happening hundreds of miles apart ON THE JAPANESE MAINLAND. The lack of damage outside the tsunami zone proves beyond all doubt that the USGS lied with their charts, and is therefore complicit in the lie that gave creedence to the Fukushima disaster.

Back to top Go down
quietobserver



Posts : 2666
Reputation : 115
Join date : 2013-02-06

PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:07 pm

Multi-Thousand Ton crawler crane failure......radiation destroys steel. Won't be long now before they start experiencing structural failures. Crane on the left in the video

Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Fukushima - epa change forthcoming   Today at 9:43 pm

Back to top Go down
 
Fukushima - epa change forthcoming
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 10Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Fukushima - epa change forthcoming
» Season of change; need clarity and clear direction.
» Can you change the icon?
» How to change DHW Temperature?
» Change of manner of execution of infra projects.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Watcher Forum :: Welcome! :: General Discussion-
Jump to: