https://allnewspipeline.com/Will_We_Still_Have_A_Constitutional_Republic_After_January_6_2023.php
By Kathleen Gotto for All News PipelineThe case of Brunson v. Adams, Docket No. 22-380, will be distributed and reviewed for acceptance by the U.S. Supreme Court at their January 6, 2023 conference. The substance of this case hinges on the sworn oath of office to support and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, by members of all three branches of federal government. Indeed, this oath is also taken by all federal employees prior to employment and even re-employment. The named defendants in this case includes hundreds of congressmen, senators, President Biden, Vice President Harris, and Vice President Pence, collectively.
The summation of this lawsuit claims that “…Defendants violated the Constitution and their oaths by intentionally refusing to ensure an honest and fair election…” Simply put, Brunson v. Adams asserts that Americans have a Constitutional right to an honest election if elections are to be meaningful. When evidence of wrongdoing is brought forth, adjudication should be quickly forthcoming. Otherwise, if an election is deemed to be a fait accompli, irrespective of evidence to the contrary, why have any election laws, or even elections, at all?
The Brunson v. Adams lawsuit is about hundreds of U.S. Representatives and Senators breaking their oath of office by refusing to investigate the claim that enemies of the U.S. Constitution successfully rigged the 2020 election. Let this sink in: 385 representatives of the American public refused an investigation that would either support or dismiss the claims of the lawsuit. Think of all the resources those 385 legislators, plus the resources President Biden, VP Harris and VP Pence could have contributed to a swift investigation! But, no, that did not happen. Evidentiary data by a multitude of professionals must not be adjudicated, and responsibility for investigating the 2020 election must not be levied against Congress. Thus, the request to investigate the charges was shut down by the political enemies of our Constitution, who nonetheless, had taken an oath to support and defend it against all enemies foreign and domestic.
(ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER: Due to heavy censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we're running an EMERGENCY fundraising drive. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)
Brunson v. Adams began as one case and then split into two as shown on their website. This case has a compelling history of court shenanigans that began on March 23, 2021 and should be shown to the American public. People need to see the depths to which judicial officials will go to obstruct the cause of justice.
Here is a summary and background taken from their website verbatim which clearly depicts how their first lawsuit was stymied by the courts and how it ended up as two cases with Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al., being added to the docket of the SCOTUS January 6, 2023 conference:
Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al., (Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)
Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.
THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.
BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."
THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.
THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanently removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.
Read also from the Epoch Times:
Internal Files Point to Twitter Meddling in 2020 Elections
FBI Reveals It Has More Information on Deceased DNC Staffer Seth Rich
States Tighten Second Amendment Rules as SCOTUS Lifts Restrictions
Their website continues with the following:
BACKGROUND
Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.
The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.
Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a "Complaint" and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland's lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits: (Please see their website for the chronology of this tangled web of treachery by the courts.)
Let there be no mistake. Equal justice is at stake here. For the majority of U.S. Congressmen to ignore their oath to the Constitution, and withhold the right of investigating a threat to it, is beyond unconscionable. It could be deemed seditious. Congress has failed all Americans by refusing to allow an investigation into the 2020 election complaints. Therefore, will at least four SCOTUS Justices vote to move to a hearing on the case, and if so, will at least five of them subsequently make a ruling that clears the way for an investigation into the merits of the case?
Subject: Will We Still Have A Constitutional Republic After January 6, 2023? Lawsuit Against Biden And Congress Alleges They Violated Their Constitutional Oaths To Defend The US Constitution 
Mon Dec 12, 2022 5:59 pm
