The Huayqui Skeleton – New DNA Evidence!

Guest

The Huayqui Skeleton – New DNA Evidence!

Posted by lamarzulli on January 5, 2015

Commentary & Analysis

by

L. A. Marzulli

I took some much-needed time away from my research and blog. I’ve been spending my time doing lot’s of projects around the house, of which the Wifey is grateful!

My Father passed away in August and my mother has been living with us so Peggy and I have not had any real-time off.

It was good to lay the plow down for a short rest. However, I’m back and I think you’ll find this video of interest.

The picture on the left is from a lithograph from 1842 which I referred to and used in On the Trail of the Nephilim II. This was taken from a mummified woman who was at the time of her death, and subsequent mummification, seven months pregnant. The fetus was found with an elongated skull in the womb of the pregnant women.

Here is what the journal stated:

“We ourselves have observed the same fact [of the absence of signs of artificial pressure – IG] in many mummies of children of tender age, who, although they had cloths about them, were yet without any vestige or appearance of pressure of the cranium. More still: the same formation of the head presents itself in children yet unborn; and of this truth we have had convincing proof in the sight of a foetus, enclosed in the womb of a mummy of a pregnant woman, which we found in a cave of Huichay, two leagues from Tarma, and which is, at this moment, in our collection.

In 1842 there was deliberation from those who insisted that all the Peruvian skulls which were elongated were the result of cradle heard-boarding—a process in which the head of a new-born is bound between two boards and formed into the desired shape—but there were those who thought otherwise and thus we have their journal from 1842 which shows the fetus with an elongated skull in the womb!

Now fast forward to 2014 where a very unusual skeleton is examined. This specimen is called Huayqui and I have seen it and photographed it when we were in Peru shooting Watchers 6 – The Secret Cosmic War.

The Huayqui Skeleton – New DNA Evidence! 100-wayqui-2-jpg

The Huayqui Skeleton – New DNA Evidence! 100-wayqui-2-jpg

Here is the picture I took at Sr. Renalto’s museum, which is on the way to the sacred valley. I was taken aback by what I saw and now DNA testing has been done on this specimen and the results are shocking. (See the video link above.)

Does this prove this is a Nephilim skull? No, it doesn’t. But what it does do, is point to the validity of our hypothesis that there is an outside agency manipulating the genome. We read in Genesis 3: I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed (offspring) and her seed (offspring;)

What we find in this passage is a pronunciation from the Most High God that there is going to be a seed-war between the seed of the Fallen Cherub and the seed of the woman. When we skip over to Genesis 6, we see this manifest openly in the first incursion of the fallen host of heaven, and the results of this unholy union between the fallen angels and the women of earth is the Nephilim. This is the beginning of the “seed-war,” and as many of you know I believe this continues into modernity with the advent the Anti-Christ, as he will be the seed of the serpent and a counterfeit of the real messiah.

The DNA evidence from the Huayqui skeleton seems to be in line with what I would expect the results to show, that the DNA is not human.

Here is an article from Ancient Origins which was sent to me by several people! Thanks! This report was reproduced in part in On the Trail II.

http://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/elongated-skulls-utero-farewell-artificial-cranial-deformation-paradigm-002526

Two elongated infant skulls, which Rivero and Tschudi mention in Peruvian Antiquities were discovered and brought to England by Captain Blankley and presented to the Museum of the Devon and Cornwall Natural History Society in 1838. Dr. Bellamy provided a detailed description of these skulls in 1842, suggesting that they belonged to two infants – male and female, few months and about a year old respectively. He indicated substantial structural differences from those of “normal” infant skulls and the absence of the signs of artificial pressure, as well as their similarity to other “Titicacan” skulls in the Museum of the College of Surgeons in London.

– See more at:

http://www.ancient-origins.net/unexplained-phenomena/elongated-skulls-utero-farewell-artificial-cranial-deformation-paradigm-002526#sthash.WumLmSWW.dpuf

In closing todays post. The facts speak for themselves and the DNA evidence from Huayqui seems to indicate the creature was a hybrid, but a hybrid from what other being? The ancient-astronaut-theorists-crowd will point at the Huayqui DNA and tell us this is proof of the extraterrestrial visiting the planet. I, of course differ and would posit that Huayqui may be the progeny of the fallen ones.

The bottom line is this. We have to keep at it and nail this down and this is why I’m on the trail!