Forced Adult Vaccinations HHS Comment Period Extended To March 23, 2015

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/03/forced-adult-vaccinations-hhs-comment.html

Forced Adult Vaccinations HHS Comment Period Extended To March 23, 2015

Catherine J. Frompovich
Activist Post

Health and Human Services has extended the comment period for The National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) that was published in the Federal Register on February 6, 2015, Volume 80, Number 25, pages 6721-6722, from March 9th to Monday, March 23rd, 2015.

Comments can be sent via the U.S. Postal Service or electronically by Internet email to the following addresses:

Quote :

Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed to: Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov.

Quote :

Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201.

Please don’t hesitate to let federal health agencies know your feelings about vaccines/vaccinations, especially the mandate that all adult citizens MUST get children’s vaccination updates.

It is important to put the following Comment reference at the beginning of your submission so it can be placed in the proper comment file for consideration:

Quote :

Federal Register Doc. 2015-02481-NAIP Comment due date extended to 3-23-15

To learn more of what I had to say about adult vaccinations, plus the two comments I submitted, readers may want to access the following:
Forced Adult Vaccinations at Federal Levels Comment Period Now
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/forced-adult-vaccinations-at-federal.html

Comments to HHS about Mandatory Vaccinations due March 9th [Catherine’s First (2/26) Comment to HHS]
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/comments-to-hhs-about-mandatory.html

Suggestions to HHS Regarding Vaccinations [Catherine’s Second (3/1) Comment to HHS]
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/03/suggestions-to-hhs-regarding.html

Informed Choice: Who Supports It?
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/03/informed-choice-who-supports-it.html

Vaccinated Farm Fish Have Side Effects
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/03/vaccinated-farmed-fish-have-side-effects.html

Personally, I find it rather interesting that the comment period has been extended. Let’s tell them what we would like them to know. Hopefully, they will listen.

Catherine retired from researching and writing, but felt compelled to write this article. 

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

So, do I have to monitor every gov agency every day for this kind of crap or is MSN or Fox or CBS or NBC or one of the other spokes pieces going to announce to us before the time is up????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
WELL MAINSTREAM?????????????????????????

Oh yeah net neuteredtrallity ,,,, oh it's CLINTON distractions.. when would "THEY" tell us it passed??????????????????????????????????

OOP's it already passed in their minds and on paper and they are just making you feel like you had a voice....

SCORE 10 MORE RED POINTS FOR ME WOO HOO!!

Thanks for posting this. I had no idea they had seriously proposed a mandatory vaccination scheme and were taking comments, but once I saw this post, I wrote a letter.  I've copied it below for anyone who wants to use the talking points in it though please don't copy it word for word since there is less impact if identical letters are received. In that case, they think it's a form letter and they discount the opinion expressed.

Quote :

Dear Senior Policy Adviser Fish:
 
I most strongly am against any mandatory vaccination scheme, such as that proposed by the National Adult Immunization Plan (NAIP) for numerous reasons:
 
First, vaccination is a medical treatment which carries numerous risks, including death.  We do not force adults to undergo medical treatment; that is a matter of choice.  Even when the choice concerns a life other than our own, such as in abortion, the law is on the side of choice.  Informed consent is the standard for medical treatment and to enact legislation requiring vaccination violates that standard.
 
Second, vaccinations are meant to be protective care.  If someone believes in the efficacy of vaccination to protect them from whichever disease they are being inoculated against, then they have the right to take vaccinations.  Forcing their neighbor to be inoculated also will not give the vaccinated person any more protection.
 
Third, there is genuine dispute about the safety of vaccinations and their side-effects.  The science is far from settled and since that is so, it is irresponsible for a government to force people to receive a medical treatment which could have disastrous effects on individuals.  I believe this rush to vaccinate has occurred because of panic over the recent measles outbreaks.  I would note that since 2005 there have been NO deaths attributable to measles in the US, but according to CDC statistics, 86 people have died from the vaccine, with another 2,000 people disabled. 
 
Fourth, studies from countries such as the UK demonstrate that inflammatory bowel disease is 13 times more common in people who have been vaccinated for measles; the risk of MS is 3 times greater for people vaccinated with the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine; cases of Type 1 diabetes in children under 14 is almost double in countries where the BCG vaccination against tuberculosis is used; in 1982 a paper was presented to the American Academy of Neurology revealing that 70% of SIDS deaths studied occurred within 3 weeks of pertussis vaccination; and numerous other studies reveal a higher incidence of various illnesses in those who have been vaccinated, as well as cases of brain inflammation and chronic brain damage arising from pertussis vaccination.  All of this has been well documented.
 
Fifth, there is good evidence that vaccination does not provide protection against numerous diseases.  In the 2010 outbreak of whooping cough in California, over half of those who contracted the disease had been vaccinated.  In Australia in 2009, 78% of those who contracted measles had been vaccinated against the disease, along with 84% of those who contracted whooping cough having been fully inoculated against that disease.  There are other statistics from other years and other places, but this is enough evidence to raise questions about the efficacy of vaccination.
 
Given all of this, it would be most irresponsible to require mandatory vaccination of any kind, for any age group.  I hope that policymakers will make the right choice and not implement the NAIP scheme.
 
Sincerely,

Thanks for getting involved and posting your letter example, hopefully it will spur others to make an effort also!
That most recent Measles article I posted may be of help to some.

We are being attacked from all sides by our own government... and we will soon be from all borders too!

Anyways... Onward Christian Soldiers!