SEE MORE @ http://www.naturalnews.com/051752_vaccines_informed_consent_presidential_candidates.html
Nuremberg Code. That code, which states that "the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential" and that "the degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment" speaks volumes when it comes to vaccinations.
Laws that outline personal freedoms from force and fraud shouldn't be ignored
The Nuremberg Code also addresses the hot topic of being coerced into getting vaccines against one's will; it states that voluntary consent is "absolutely essential" and that "...the person involved...should be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion...."
When it comes to the Advance Vaccine Directive (AVD) strategy, the NSF draws on U.S. and international treaty laws, which are succinctly outlined on a wallet-sized card. The card contains details of a person's legal rights that protect them from unwanted vaccinations. The AVD states that NSF "Affirmatively asserts Informed Consent" and also warns that anyone trying to administer a vaccination against another's will is grounds for malpractice.
The bottom line for NSF is to ensure that a person's right to refuse a vaccine stays intact. Determining where presidential hopefuls stand on Informed Consent and the AVD is a surefire way for those concerned about this issue to narrow down their choice when it's time to vote.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/051752_vaccines_informed_consent_presidential_candidates.html#ixzz3q0nNN28J