Russia Not to Tolerate Further Israeli Attacks on Damascus-Nuclear Subs present

http://countdowntozerotime.org/2013/05/13/ww3-approaching-middle-east-russia-not-to-tolerate-further-israeli-attacks-on-damascus/

May 13, 2013 by count down to zero time
WW3 approaching middle East :Russia Not to
Tolerate Further Israeli Attacks on Damascus :Russia’s Mediterranean
Task Force to Include Nuclear Subs – Navy Chief

<table border="0" width="100%"> <tr> <td colspan="2" align="Left" valign="top"></td> </tr> </table>

TEHRAN (FNA)- Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, while in Shanghai, was given a sharp dressing-down by Russian President Vladimir Putin, a warning that Russia would not tolerate further Israeli attacks on Damascus and would respond. Putin did not say how, but he did announce he had ordered the acceleration of highly advanced Russian weapons supplies to Syria. Israeli Debkafile’s military sources disclosed that the Russian leader was referring to S-300 anti-air systems and the nuclear-capable 9K720 Iskander (NATO named SS-26 Stone) surface missiles, which are precise enough to hit a target within a 5-7 meter radius at a distance of 280 kilometers. In his phone call to Netanyahu, the Russian leader advised the prime minister to make sure to keep this in mind. Since Syrian air defense teams have already trained in Russia on the handling of the S-300 interceptor batteries, they can go into service as soon as they are landed by one of Russia’s daily airlifts to Syria. Russian air defense officials will supervise their deployment and prepare them for operation. Moscow is retaliating not just for Israel’s air operations against Syria but in anticipation of the Obama administration’s impending decision to send the first US arms shipments to the Syrian rebels. Intelligence agencies in Moscow and the Middle-East take it for granted that by the time Washington goes public on this decision, some of the Syrian rebel factions will already be armed with American weapons. That the measure was in the works was signified by the introduction Monday by chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Bob Menendez of legislation allowing the US to provide arms and military training to the Syrian rebels. US military instructors have been working with Syrian rebels at training camps in Jordan and Turkey for some months. So putting the arms in their hands only awaited a decision in Washington, the Israeli website alleged. Putin’s message to Netanyahu was intended to reach a wider audience than Jerusalem, such as Barack Obama in Washington and President Xi Jinping in Beijing ahead of Netanyahu’s talks there Tuesday.

I may be totally wrong on this and have no information to back this up. For whatever reason, I think Israeli weapons scientists have the means to defeat the S-300's. Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part. Time will tell.

Dude looks like he needs to add a few prunes to his breakfast cereal.



I'm watching all this develop with that "hook in the jaw" prophecy in Ezekiel 38 & 39 in mind. To early to tell yet but I'm on alert.

http://www.debka.com/article/22963/Putin-again-warns-Netanyahu-hands-off-Syria

Putin again warns Netanyahu hands off Syria

DEBKAfile Special Report May 14, 2013, 6:42 PM (IDT)




Putin and Netanyahu talk three hours at Sochi



Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu spent three
hours with Russian President Vladimir Putin at his residence in the
Black Sea resort of Sochi, Tuesday, May, 14. He came for a last-ditch
attempt to head off the supply of advanced Russian anti-air S-300
missile systems to Syria. Instead, the Russian leader turned the
conversation around to focus implicitly on Israel’s air strikes against
Damascus on May 3 and May 5. After their conversation he issued a
warning: "In this crucial period it is especially important to avoid any
moves that can shake the situation."


This was clearly a hands-off caution to Israel not to repeat its attacks
on Damascus. And, furthermore, after “shaking the situation” in Syria
by its air attacks, Israel was in no position to demand that Russia
avoid selling Syria advanced weapons.
The prime minister, for his part, warned that the entire Middle East was in a dangerous state of volatility.


He was accompanied by Israeli Military Intelligence Chief Maj. Gen.
Aviv Kochavi. Opposite him sat Mikhail Fradkov, SVR Director.


Kochavi laid before the Russian leader the information Israel had
gathered on the state of Syria’s chemical weapons with relevance to
their transfer to the Lebanese Hizballah.
Before Netanyahu’s arrival for the meeting, Moscow took two preparatory steps:


1. Russian diplomats leaked to the London-based Arab press a report
that the S-300 missiles had already arrived in Syria. According to Al-Quds Al-Arabi, Moscow had delivered 200 launchers (probably missiles) and the Syrian missile teams already knew how to use them.
By this leak, the Israeli prime minister was being informed that his
journey to Sochi was a waste of time and that the use of S-300 missiles
for shooting down Israeli Air Force planes was no longer controlled by
Moscow but by Damascus.
2. The prominent strategic analyst, Viktor Kremenyuk of The USA and
Canada Institute in Moscow, reported Tuesday that Netanyahu arrived in
Sochi to indirectly let Putin know that “Israel would destroy the S-300s
when they are delivered and start being assembled.”
The deputy director of an important Russian think tank which advises the
Kremlin on North American policy does not tend to make idle comments.
debkafile’s
Moscow sources interpreted Kremenyuk’s remark as a means of informing
the Israeli leader that Moscow was not impressed by such threats.
Instead of pushing Putin to stop the S-300 missiles, Israel would be
more advantageously employed urging the Obama administration to adopt a
more realistic stand on Syria and Bashar Assad.
In Moscow's view, Washington must be brought to give up its threat of
Western military intervention in Syria, of which the Israeli air strikes
appeared to Putin as the harbinger, and come to terms with Assad’s
presence in any political solution of the Syrian conflict.


These positions the Russian President had conveyed previously to US
Secretary of State John Kerry and UK Prime Minister David Cameron. He
made it clear to Netanyahu that he stood by them as firmly as ever.
Therefore, say debkafile’s
sources, so long as both powers remain entrenched in their positions,
there is not much hope of their coming together on an international
conference to resolve the Syrian conflict.
debkafile’s
military sources add: It is also unlikely that the Russian and Israeli
leaders had a chance to work out reciprocal ground rules for the Russian
officers supervising the S-300 missile operations in Syria to avoiding
hitting Israeli Air Force jets or for Israeli bombers to refrain from
destroying them.


The S-300 is designed to shoot down planes and missiles at 200-km ranges.
Israel is concerned that Moscow may decided to send the six S-300
batteries carrying 144 missiles due for Syria along with Russian missile
and air defense specialists. They will also be available for operating
the missiles effectively for downing Israeli Air Force planes striking
targets in Syria and Lebanon. Israel will be forced to think twice
before attacking the S-300 batteries for fear of hitting the Russian
officers. Putin is therefore placing a severe constraint on Israel’s
operational freedom by spreading an anti-air missile cover over the
Syrian, Hizballah and the Iranian Basij forces fighting for Bashar
Assad.

Wow. The final pieces of the prophecies are finally getting into place.

1) Russia once again showing full support to the enemies of Israel and blatantly showing that they are against Israel.
2) Russia using its "buddy-buddy" with China to keep China from helping Israel; China of course will favor Russia because they're border-neighbors, while Israel is too far from China. China only cares for Iran, Iran is China's buffer against the West (EU).
3) When Israel is left without an ally (with Obama draining the US), Israel will call for help from the king of the north, the German-led EU.
4) German-led EU will attack Iran and destroy the Persian Empire once-and-for-all, and defeat Russia along the way (religious reason: Vatican vs. Orthodox Catholics in Russia - root: West and East Roman Empire; Byzantine Empire; Russian Empire; and Communism)
5) China will fear the German-led EU armies. Will call on the rest of the "kings of the east" (the two Koreas, Japan, ASEAN [ie South-East Asia], India, and probably even Australia and New Zealand) to help push the king of the north away.
6) king of the north will defeat the kings of the east
7) the kings of the south will fear the king of the north as well (Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the Arab Nations)
German-led EU will destroy them all as well (religious: Vatican hates Islam) + (wipe out the remaining Persian/Iranian influences)
9) 7-Year Peace Treaty with Israel, they can finally finish the rest of the modern Temple of Jerusalem

If you go back and listen to the Hagmann & Hagmann report on Thanksgiving day of 2012 you will find that I called in and said then that the predictive programming shows that a major catalyst (if not the catalyst) will take place in the Mediterranean Sea. The event will most likely evolve around the oil drilling platform/platforms being erected and put in place over the new oil reserves discovered there. The events show that both Israel and Britain/USA/Nato will be successful at accomplishing their task of preserving it and Russia while also showing force will come away from the event feeling victorious, but on the world stage Israel will be praised for showing "great moral fiber" in restraint. However, Israel will end up having to 'save' the French who also are present. In case anyone has forgotten NATO sent the French to Israel in a show of support

OH, I believe this will involve a submarine event. I believe that is what is being portrayed.

EDGING CLOSER AND CLOSER!!

http://www.debka.com/article/22970/Syrian-Israeli-war-of-words-via-Putin-edges-into-Syrian-Hizballah-war-of-attrition-

Syrian-Israeli war of words via Putin edges into Syrian-Hizballah war of attrition.
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report May 16, 2013, 10:58 AM (IDT)
Tags: Binyamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Bashar Assad, Palestinian terror, Hizballah, US warships,
USS Kearsarge which docked in Eilat
USS Kearsarge which docked in Eilat

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Netanyahu ended their three-hour meeting in Sochi Tuesday, May 14, at loggerheads on Syria. In fact, Putin warned his guest that Israel and its army, the IDF, were heading for war with Syria in which Russia might well be involved – and not just through the advanced S-300 anti-air missiles supplied to the Assad government. The case Netanyahu and Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. Aviv Kochavi put before Putin and Russian foreign intelligence chief, SVR Director Mikhail Fradkov, fell on deaf ears.
They found the Russian leader further infuriated by the docking that day at Israel’s Red Sea port of Eilat of the USS Kearsarge, carrying 1,800 marines and a consignment of 20 V-22 Osprey helicopters which US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel had promised to supply to Israel during his April visit.
Putin viewed the stationing of US forces in the Gulf of Aqaba just two hours away the Israeli-Syrian border for repelling Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah aggression against Israel or Jordan – signaled by the Kearsage’s arrival - as an act of bad faith by Washington. On the one hand, they want us to cooperate for an international conference to end the bloodshed in Syria, while on the other, they deploy military forces, he complained to Netanyahu.

The Israeli prime minister countered with a warning that Israel would continue to strike advanced weapons in Syria that were destined for Hizballah. And if President Bashar Assad hit back for Israel’s May 5 bombardment of weapons stores on Mount Qassioun near Damascus, Israel would intensify its bombardments of Syrian military targets and weapons until Assad was left to fight off rebel assaults empty-handed.
Putin rejected this threat as implausible.
Neither Putin nor Netanyahu put all their cards on the table, but the conversation ended with the Russian leader fully confident that his capabilities for safeguarding Assad were greater than Israel’s ability to destroy him.

In the end, Netanyahu and his party arrived home Tuesday evening with a bad feeling. They were certain that Moscow had given Assad the green light to go through with his threat to make the Syrian Golan and the Horan of southern Syria “a front for resistance” – i.e. the platforms for embarking on a war of attrition against northern Israel with the help of a flow of advanced weapons to Hizballah.
The Syrian ruler is strongly encouraged to adopt this path by Tehran. Hizballah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah has embraced it. And the radical Palestinian leader, Ahmed Jibril, head of the Assad-satellite Popular Front-General Command, has eagerly offered his services.

And indeed, Wednesday, the day after Netanyahu’s trip to Sochi, Jibril’s group let loose with mortar fire on the Israeli Mt. Hermon ski site, firing from a Syrian army position.

Israeli military sources confirmed later that these were no stray shells from a Syrian-army-rebel battle as in former cases, but a deliberate attack. In Jerusalem, it was taken as a direct consequence of Moscow’s account to Assad of the conversation between the Russian and Israeli leaders. They concluded that Assad took it for granted that he was now at liberty to go on the offensive against Israel.
Wednesday night, Netanyahu’s office reacted to this deterioration with a swift and strong warning.
Israeli media were informed bluntly that if the Assad chose to retaliate for Israel’s air strikes, he would be removed from power.
That same night, “a senior Israeli official” contacted The New York Times with a more detailed warning quoted by the paper: "If Syrian President Assad reacts by attacking Israel, or tries to strike Israel through his terrorist proxies, he will risk forfeiting his regime, for Israel will retaliate."

Within hours, early Thursday morning, May 16, Jerusalem had its answer from Damascus.
A Palestinian group calling itself “Martyrs of the Abdel Qader al-Husseini Brigades” (named for the commander of a Palestinian force fighting Israel in its 1948 War of Independence) claimed responsibility for the "rockets" aimed at an Israeli military observation post in the Golan Heights. They were fired in honor of Nakba Day, said the statement released in Damascus "We are not celebrating but avenging the blood of our martyrs."

A video showing the launch was appended.
Palestinian terrorist groups habitually use made-up names when claiming attacks, a practice often followed by al Qaeda, but this one was easily identified by Israel and taken to mean that Assad had begun using what the Israeli official referred to in The New York Times as "his terrorist proxies."

Depending on the next move decided on by Prime Minister Netanyahu, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, this incident could mark the tipping-point of a slide towards a war confrontation against Israel by Syria, Hizballah and other Assad proxies.

Warrior Shepard wrote:

OH, I believe this will involve a submarine event. I believe that is what is being portrayed.

NATO just wrapped up its largest anti-submarine exercise ever a month or two ago. The air assets flew from US Naval Air Station in Sigonella, Italy. (The exercise was in the med, symbolically enough Mt. Etna was violently erupting at the time)
If I recall correctly from something I read nothing gets into the Med without being stalked from the straits of Gibraltar. Supposedly there's always a NATO sub basically lying in wait. Ironic, because in a war scenario you may very well have a Russian or Chinese sub sunk by a U-boat that was lying in wait. The U-212 type is supposedly the absolute best hunter/killer sub in the world (its covered in the same paint & material as our F-117) Ironically, The German's sub flagship is the U33. The prior boat designated U33 was sunk in WWII, strangely enough its first kill was HMS Olive Grove.

Wonder if Iran will send their submarine fleet into the fray?

http://watchermeetup.50.forumer.com/iran-s-new-submarine-t1253647.html

researcher wrote:

Wonder if Iran will send their submarine fleet into the fray?

[url=http://watchermeetup.50.forumer.com/iran-s-new-submarine-t1253647.html

http://watchermeetup.50.forumer.com/iran-s-new-submarine-t1253647.html[/quote[/url]]

LOL right! Rough seas in the Suez will probably prevent them from sailing to the action.