Q RELATED APRIL 22

PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY

I can see this door swinging so hard back and forth it comes unhinged.
BUT I can't say what's going on, and the Anons can't either, it seems.
I'm thinking the Riyadh raid was to get 'proofs'.
And Huma and MB factor in.  This could be REALLY GOOD!  LOL.  Even the moab?
The age-old adage...follow the money.

Some standard definitions:

Plausible Deniability means being able to cast enough doubt over your culpability that it cannot be ascertained.
It is generally used by governments running military black ops, or companies engaged in corporate espionage, to avoid the legal and/or political consequences of illegal or legally ambiguous actions.

An (fictitious) example would be if the US wanted to spy on the UK, they'd send a "retired" intelligence officer. Because he isn't officially employed by the US government, if he is discovered they can deny he was operating under their orders and avoid a political incident with one of their closest allies. Saying the intelligence officer was acting on his own as a rogue agent is a reasonably plausible denial of involvement, hence Plausible Deniability.
It's basically the same as Reasonable Doubt, but applied to organised bodies, rather than individual people.
-------

Plausible deniability is the ability of people (typically senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command) to deny knowledge of or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by others in an organizational hierarchy because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved in or at least willfully ignorant of the actions. In the case that illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such acts to insulate themselves and shift blame onto the agents who carried out the acts, as they are confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise. The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible, that is, credible, although sometimes it merely makes it unactionable. The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions to plausibly avoid responsibility for one's (future) actions or knowledge. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates involved in heinous acts and nullify any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.
--------------------------

1229

Quote :

Apr 21 2018 13:55:43 (EST) Anonymous ID: 8af18d 1133099   ClipboardImage.png

ClipboardImage.png

>>1133014
>>1133070

TREASURE TROVE

Apr 21 2018 14:02:49 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: b7a0ab 1133189   >>1133099
Expand further.
Why are we making it public?
Blackwater USA.
Plausible deniability.
Planned.
The world is connected.
You have more than you know.
Q
-----------------------------

Quote :

Apr 8 2018 16:39:06 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 198500 955760  
>>955656
Pictures leaked for this very moment.
Who/what is not pictured?
What forces shadowed No Name?
Contractors.
Special contractors.
What was delivered?
Smiles.
Exact location.
Exact.
Buildings E of spider web.
Spider web marker.
Open source.
Q

Apr 8 2018 16:47:12 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 198500 955902   >>955760
https://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/1209/Report_Blackwater_CEO_Eric_Prince_was_CIA_asset.html
Think Double.
Why are we confirming this publicly?
Why now?
Q

i've seen a lot of plausible deniability during the course of my project. It appears to be designed that way so "they" (whoever they are) can plunder without recourse.

i still can't find the spiderweb.

The web Q was talking about, or the one you keep encountering?

The one Q was talking about, if it's the same as the one my clues refer to. If i've encountered any, i didn't recognize them as spider webs.

I think I can connect you with some of it tomorrow.  I'll try.