Trump Ain’t Messin’ Around – Today’s New Trump Odds & Ends – More Troops on Border & Anchor Babies

Happy to see the troops increase notice but I’m absolutely ECSTATIC over the birthright citizenship “anchor babies” thing. This is a HUGE problem here in San Diego where every day pregnant and about to burst Mexican women cross into California from Tijuana and drop a baby at our expense and the kid is now a bona fide USA citizen. Mommy and kid settle in and haul the entire family over right down to every eleventh cousin removed. This has to stop and I’ve been at the fore front of the fight to end it for many years.
 
As far as I know the USA and Canada is the only “developed” nations with this anchor baby thing so when you hear the left (and the world) howl about cruelty just remember that little factoid.
 

Numbers USA wrote:

Birthright Citizenship is the automatic granting of citizenship to children born within a nation's borders or territories. The United States and Canada are the only developed nations in the world to still offer Birthright Citizenship to tourists and illegal aliens.
 
The following are among the nations repealing Birthright Citizenship in recent years:

• Australia (2007)
  
• New Zealand (2005)
  
• Ireland (2005)
  
• France (1993)
  
• India (1987)
  
• Malta (1989)
  
• UK (1983)
  
• Portugal (1981)
  

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/learn/issues/birthright-citizenship/nations-granting-birthright-citizenship.html

i see he is considering as many as 15,000 troops which concerns me because this makes me wonder exactly WHAT really is going on down there

Did ya see the video of the train headed South to the border loaded with trucks, tanks, and various other military odds & ends? If you go to the link the video will play. Below is just a screen shot I took.

And yeah, Mike, something big happening down there and we don't have all the facts yet. Keep those eyes and ears peeled.

Wanna save it? RIGHT click ==> https://media.8ch.net/file_store/9ec111f83fc957338600576968ecb7993c2c360aeb2a6f20d0ae2a96675f680c.mp4

https://twitter.com/RightWingLawMan/status/1057360816427552768

Numbers USA wrote:

Birthright Citizenship is the automatic granting of citizenship to children born within a nation's borders or territories. The United States and Canada are the only developed nations in the world to still offer Birthright Citizenship to tourists and illegal aliens.

i have questions about this. i have been following the "map" (that came with my iMac) like Q told us to do. In satellite view, most of the buildings and gardens in the cities look like symbols which, along with the statues and (carefully planned) street names, tell a story. For example, this is the reflecting pool behind the Capitol:



It's all symbols with esoteric meanings like hieroglyphs. They're all over the world - everywhere. That's why Q said their symbols will be their downfall. They tell a story.

Anyway, i've been trying to find my way into the country by reading the map (and it's very much about how we are being deceived and how to get out). However, what i am finding is that it seems none of us were considered born here in the USA to begin with (legally), so you can see why i'm quite concerned about what the President just said.

Especially what did he mean when he said, "It is not covered by the 14th Amendment because of the words “subject to the jurisdiciton thereof” "?

He's talking about being a real deal American and not the 14th Amendment variety. So, what has been going on? Are the illegals becoming real Americans with rights and we are not? Like i said, i have questions.

Something to ponder from an 8chan anon. I read it, read it again, then slowed down and really digested every concept during a third reading. This makes scary sense. This was found on Tiger D and merits thievery to this forum.

Pulled this explanation of the 14th Amendment:

>>3678062 "All persons born" was a phrase use to include blacks with full citizenship after the Jim Crow (democrat) laws declared them partial citizens, limited voting and land ownership rights. The 14th amendment made it clear ALL citizens were equal under the law, the "or naturalized" was the phrase to say that immigrants had to be naturalized citizens for their children to receive automatic citizenship. The US Constitution was not written to protect the rights of non-US citizens. The "or naturalized" terminology would have been unnecessary if anyone born in America was to automatically be a citizen because it goes without saying that "naturalized" citizens were born outside the US. The "or naturalized" was included to distinguish the difference between "naturalized" immigrant parents who are citizens and "non-naturalized" parents in the country who were not citizens. Only the children of the "naturalized" immigrants were to receive citizenship.

This is amazing !  Trump has the right idea on protecting  the  US , but will he be able to get this done? Anchor babies  away. (citizenship only  through the proper channels !)  
  On protecting our borders, the antagonists  out there waiting for the signal ... Will antifa types come out of the woodwork? Will some thing happen  during midterms? The pot is being stirred  to  benefit a plan.. No coincidence- the timing on these border infiltrations. Our president knows something.... 
 I myself am very thankful to have troops protecting us for this mass influx of  unknown hostilities. President Trump has scored big time with me.

From the twitter video♬♪♬  ???????? Elizabeth Hock ♬♪♬‏ 

[ltr]@LizzyHock1963[/ltr]

 Oct 30
[size=1]More[/size]
They might run all the way back home, and tell all their friends, "Them Americans, they crazy loco, they came after us with tanks and assault helicopters, don't go to America"

researcher wrote:

>>3678062 "All persons born" was a phrase use to include blacks with full citizenship after the Jim Crow (democrat) laws declared them partial citizens, limited voting and land ownership rights. The 14th amendment made it clear ALL citizens were equal under the law, the "or naturalized" was the phrase to say that immigrants had to be naturalized citizens for their children to receive automatic citizenship. The US Constitution was not written to protect the rights of non-US citizens. The "or naturalized" terminology would have been unnecessary if anyone born in America was to automatically be a citizen because it goes without saying that "naturalized" citizens were born outside the US. The "or naturalized" was included to distinguish the difference between "naturalized" immigrant parents who are citizens and "non-naturalized" parents in the country who were not citizens. Only the children of the "naturalized" immigrants were to receive citizenship.

Thanks Researcher, that was somewhat helpful.

Keep in mind though that the 14th amendment was written specifically (supposedly) for freed black slaves, giving them US (the new - after the Civil War - Constitution) citizenship. The original Constitution has a clause in it that says something like (you'll have to look it up), only white people were allowed to be Citizens of the States, so they had to write this amendment to give the "freed" slaves a place to go. Now we're pretty much all there - black, subservient.

Anyway, the other thing to take note of is the word "persons" which was just previously redefined for use in the US jurisdiction. It doesn't mean "People". "persons" are a sub-class of being, subject to ...

Tucker Carlson: Birthright citizenship is a scam. There is no other word for it
 
Full report and video below. Scathing!
 
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-birthright-citizenship-is-a-scam-there-is-no-other-word-for-it?intcmp=ob_article_sidebar_video&intcmp=obnetwork
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOQcG4hRSA

 

FOX NEWS wrote:

Tucker Carlson: Birthright citizenship is a scam. There is no other word for it
 
Election Day is finally becoming a referendum on something that really matters: immigration. Who gets to live here? What does citizenship mean? What kind of country do we want?


These are not small incidental questions. What you are watching is not an argument about Russian Facebook ads or Stormy Daniels or her creepy lawyer or some other diversion designed to prevent you from thinking clearly. These are core debates. These are the arguments that every functioning democracy must have and yet ours rarely does.

Consider the question of birthright citizenship. Under current interpretations of American law anyone born on our soil automatically becomes a U.S. citizen. Context is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if your parents were terrorists or illegal aliens or foreign saboteurs if their plane was forced down to refuel and you emerged. It doesn't matter. If you were born on our property, you are a citizen.

In a recent interview with Axios, President Trump suggested this is not a great deal for America. He pledged to change it with an executive order.

As of right now, it seems likely that order would abolish so-called “birth” tourism. That's where people travel to the United States solely for the purpose of having kids and winning citizenship along with the many benefits that follow from that. We'll know more about it soon and of course, we'll tell you when we do know.

But nobody else in Washington is waiting for details. They hate it already. The very same people who have spent decades trying to gut the Bill of Rights are now lecturing the rest of us that the idea is -- brace yourself -- unconstitutional.

Paul Ryan, the outgoing speaker of the House, announced his opposition to this immediately.

“Well, you obviously cannot do that," Ryan said. "You cannot end birthright citizenship with an executive order.”

Note the phrasing. "Obviously" is what people say when they don't feel like making a rational case for their positions -- usually because they can't. Is it really "obvious" that the Constitution requires us to give citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants? Paul Ryan has no idea. He just doesn't want to have a conversation about it. He wants you to be quiet.

In fact, as a legal matter, it is an open question. The Supreme Court has never ruled on it. But there is ample reason to believe the law does not apply to illegal immigrants or birth tourists.

Birthright citizenship arises from the 14th Amendment that was passed just three years after the Civil War to guarantee citizenship to freed slaves. The senator who wrote the citizenship clause in the 14th Amendment,
Jacob Howard of Michigan, explained the point of it on the Senate floor at the time.

"The Amendment will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers," he said.

The amendment was designed to ensure that newly freed slaves would be treated as the American citizens they were. The point was to enfranchise African-Americans. The point was not to enable the rest of the world to scam our system, to abuse our generosity. Trump's proposal would get us closer to the purpose of the 14th Amendment. And for that, he is being denounced naturally as a racist.

The fact is, there is no more serious debate than the one over citizenship. And it's long overdue. Globally, birthright citizenship is the rare exception, not the rule. Canada and the U.S. are the only developed countries that have birthright citizenship. Not a single European country allows it. Out of the 54 countries in Africa, only two offer birthright citizenship. Are the other 52 racists?

Don't blame the Chinese or the Russians or the Salvadorans or anybody else using the system. We're the ones offering it. The blame lies with us.

How about Harry Reid, is he a racist too? Here’s how the former Democratic Senate Majority Leader explained his views on birthright citizenship:

“With making it easy to be an illegal alien is enough," he argued in the 1990s. "How about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that. Right. Guess again. If you break our laws by entering this country without permission to give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and guarantee a full access to all public and social services this society provides and that's a lot of services. Is it any wonder that two-thirds of the babies born at taxpayer expense in county-run hospitals in Los Angeles are born to illegal alien mothers?”

Now as a factual matter, that's tougher than anything President Trump has ever said about the issue. Keep in mind that just four years ago, Harry Reid was the top Democrat in the Senate. If he tried saying that today, he'd be called "Bull Connor" and shouted off the stage. But the questions he raised are still fair questions:

Is unlimited birthright citizenship helping this country or is it hurting this country?

Under our current system, illegal immigrants who come to the U.S. and have children are eligible to receive tax credits, food stamps and other welfare benefits. Those are huge incentives. Not surprisingly, one in every 12 births in this country right now is to someone here illegally and that total does not even include birth tourism.

Every year tens of thousands of foreign nationals come to this country on tourist visas solely to give birth to children. The Chinese are strongly overrepresented in this. One ad in China offers "high-end U.S. birth tourism specialists" for just $20,000. These experts navigate clients through the process of having a child in America.

Their kids gain the right to Social Security, Medicare, and countless other federal programs. If they come back to the U.S. for college, they get in-state tuition, federally backed student loans, financial aid, all the benefits that ought to be going to actual Americans who are drowning in college debt. This is a scam. There is no other word for it.

And by the way, don't blame the Chinese or the Russians or the Salvadorans or anybody else using the system. We're the ones offering it. Why wouldn't they take it? The blame lies with us.

No other country would allow itself to be relentlessly exploited like this for decades and no other leadership class would side with foreigners over its own people. And yet ours does every time. And that tells you everything.

Adapted from Tucker Carlson's monologue on "Tucker Carlson Tonight," Oct. 30, 2018