Guest
Guest
 |  Subject: JAMA WARNS FLU VACCINES ARE KILLING SENIOR CITIZENS JANUARY 22, 2018  Fri May 17, 2019 10:30 am | |
| http://www.howardnema.com/2018/01/22/jama-warns-flu-vaccines-are-killing-senior-citizens/[size=33]JAMA WARNS FLU VACCINES ARE KILLING SENIOR CITIZENS[/size] JANUARY 22, 2018 TRUTH TALK NEWSBy HN
Here is the proof that flu shots are killing seniors from the JAMA.
Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat. As so it was in Hitler’s Germany. In the 1930’s the Nazis implemented a eugenics depopulation program regarding the elderly, the sick, mentally challenged and physically deformed called T-4.
Wall Street and the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations are responsible for funding Hitler’s rise to power and the eugenics programs the Nazis modeled their T-4 program from American Eugenicists to rid the Germany and the Aryan race of what Hitler called “useless eaters”.
In fact, these powerful forces continue their eugenics research to this day, branching out into DNA and genetics in their quest to rid the world of not only all disease, but all flawed humans. Their goal is to create the perfect human while weeding out the unwanted and useless elements of our society by overtly and covertly depopulating the planet to manageable levels, namely 500,000,000.
Sound’s crazy, doesn’t it? But its true. You can’t make this stuff up.
And what about the rise in autism from vaccines? 1 in 10,000 Americans had autism in 1980 with 6 vaccines given to children. Today more than 60 vaccines are given to children and autism rates are 1 in 68.
In 20 years what will America look like and what will be done with all of these millions and millions of autistic grown-ups? Hitler has the answer, a neo-T-4 depopulation program.
And what about this elderly “health aid”? Could it be a coincidence that this company titled their product T-4 by accident, or as a sick joke, or maybe it is something more sinister hidden right before our very eyes.
Without going into a whole new article, since 1955 there has been a covert depopulation agenda in place using war, additives in food, soil, air, water, illicit drugs, deadly pharmaceuticals, birth control, abortion and “euthanasia” to reduce the world population.
Big pharma kills 140,000 Americans every year, but you’ll never hear about that anywhere. As an AMA protocol there is an almost religious ritual asking and hoping elderly patients and all of us, for that matter have a living will when treated in hospitals and nursing homes around the country. It seems more important to be able to end a person’s life than sustain it, these days. This is not by accident.
A 2015 study has shown that pharmaceutical drugs cause more overdoses and more deaths than all of the illegal drugs on the market combined. According to the government’s own statistics, listed on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, deaths relating to pharmaceutical drugs rose to roughly 23,000 last year, which accounts for over half of the total overdose deaths in the country for that time period.
Additionally, a recent study conducted by researchers with the University of Virginia, University of Arkansas, the Partnership for Drug Free Kids, and the American Institutes for Research reconfirmed the known dangers of pharmaceutical drug abuse.
The study concluded that, “Teens need help before they reach these tipping points for prescription drug abuse. Adults spotting teens with very high levels of anxiety and at least moderate use of other restricted substances should realize that these are students with a high likelihood of prescription abuse. Male teens with a high need to be popular andteens in general appear to be at exceptional risk. Campaigns must target parents as well, since they clearly underestimate both the physical risks of prescription drugs and the likelihood that their children will abuse these drugs.”
Sadly, the authors of the study described any average teenager, however, it does give us some insight into the root causes of teenage drug abuse.
As the study noted, teens are being pushed towards drug use by the high-stress environment that is created by modern culture and government schools. Many times, these students are even prescribed a wide variety of these medications to help them cope with the stresses of teenage life, which means that doctors are essentially putting their stamp of approval on daily teenage use of amphetamines like Adderall or tranquilizers like Xanax.
A study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) highlighted this phenomenon, pointing out that “Prescription drugs are seen as blessed by a trusted institution, the FDA, while increasingly aggressive advertising by drug companies simultaneously floods parents and children with messages that these substances are safe, popular, and beneficial.”
The previous excerpt was from John Vibes’ article (Government Says Big Pharma Kills More People Than All Illegal Drugs Combined) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org.
“Influenza vaccination in the United States has long been recommended for all persons 65 years or older.Vaccination coverage for this age group increased from between 15% and 20% before 1980 to 65% in 2001.However, 3-year moving averages of unadjusted excess P&I mortality rates among people 65 years or older—compiled for the Healthy People 2000 initiative to track the effect of vaccination on US influenza-related mortality—rose substantially during this period. This was surprising because influenza vaccination is thought to be highly effective at reducing influenza-related mortality.”So says a recent study by the Journal of the American Medical Association, a peer-reviewed medical journal published 48 times a year by the American Medical Association.
 
Sharyl Attkisson, a former investigative journalist for CBS, says the study shows there is no improvement in mortality rates among senior citizens who get flu shots, and may actually contribute to increased ill-health and death.
An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially.
The authors of the study admitted a bias going into the study. Here was the history as described to me: Public health experts long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate a benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong–instead of believing the scientific data–the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong.
After all, flu shots have to work, right?
So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit.
But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The scientists finally had to acknowledge that decades of public health thought had been mistaken.
Read the government study that found no flu shot benefit in elderly
After a 2006 study, lead author Lone Simonsen revealed no benefit to the elderly by taking flu shots. In fact, taking flu shots increased the risk of death by the flu. Many international studies also arrived at the same conclusion.
You probably haven’t heard much about these “incendiary” findings since too much money is being made promoting flu shots.
Read Simonsen’s commentary on her study
Read current CDC flu information
Here’s Sharyl Attkisson’s original video story on the topic.
Inquisitr.com reports: The study “got little attention,” she says, “because the science came down on the wrong side.” Whereas the researchers had set out to prove that the push for massive flu vaccination would save the world, the researchers were “astonished” to find that the data did not support their presupposition at all. The data actually shows that deaths increased, not decreased, among seniors following vaccination.
Johns Hopkins scientist, Peter Doshi, Ph.D., issued a report in the prestigious British Medical Journal, according to NewsLI, asserting that the CDC policy of routinely recommending the flu vaccine is being based on “low quality studies that do not substantiate claims.” He says there is no evidence that the vaccine reduces deaths among senior citizens. Interestingly, Doshi cites an Australian study which found significant risks for children as well, stating that “one in every 110 children under the age of five had convulsions following vaccinations in 2009 for H1N1 influenza.”
During the drug trials for the Fluzone flu vaccine, 23 seniors out of 3,833 died after receiving the shot, according to the drug’s package insert, reported by Health Impact News. Another 226 experienced “serious adverse effects.” The manufacturer denies any connection between the deaths and the flu vaccine.
Seniors Told Get Flu Vaccine
There appears to be growing public skepticism that the flu vaccine is as beneficial as the experts say. The level of doubt is strongly correlated to the incidence of accounts of research fraud in the vaccine industry, an industry which makes billions of dollars of profit every year.
|
|
