The Democrats Are the Gun Confiscation Party-Genocide ALWAYS Follows Gun Confiscation

https://thecommonsenseshow.com/activism-agenda-21-conspiracy/democrats-are-gun-confiscation-party-genocide-always-follows-gun-confiscation

The Democrats Are the Gun Confiscation Party-Genocide ALWAYS Follows Gun Confiscation

Submitted by Dave Hodges on Friday, August 2, 2019 - 12:18.


If the Democrats are elected and control the White House in 2020, America is electing the party of gun confiscation and history shows that America would be electing the party of genocide, by default. 
The often quoted University of Hawaii Democide Project makes is very clear that when the government goes after the guns of its citizens, genocide happens and is happened 16 times in the 20th century. But despite history speaking very clearly on this event, the Democrats running for President, in the 2020 Election Campaign, have made is abundantly clear where they stand on this issue. From the LA Times:

Quote :

Almost every (Democratic) candidate in the field supports universal background checks, implementing “red flag” laws to take away guns from high-risk individuals, and bringing back a ban on the sale of “assault” weapons...

And what Americans must consider is that the above quote from the LA Times represents the position that the Democrats are taking to get elected. If elected, they will 100% move to take your guns. Even if they did not move to take your guns, there is historical precedent in their "electable platforms" that are cause for concern:
[list="box-sizing: border-box; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 1.25rem; margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 3.25rem; padding-right: 0px; color: rgb(75, 73, 72); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"]
[*]Universal background checks will set the stage for future confiscation as the government will have an actionable list to work from. And spare me the nonsensical public safety argument. According to the FBI, over 90% of the guns used in the commission of a crime are stolen. 

[*]Red Flag laws are thinly failed gun confiscation policies. They Democrats say that this gets the guns out of the hands of people that are dangerous. However, all it takes to be considered a dangerous person is for your neighbor to say so. 

[*]Assault rifle bans are ridiculous as the criminalize guns in their manufactured state. They are reducing the firepower of the American people so they can have their way with the people once they takeover the White House in 2020. And if Trump does not forcefully take on social media censorship, he will very likely not get elected. The abovementioned policies are prelude to outright confiscation and as history teaches, genocide follows. The University of Hawaii research is clear. Genocide does not follow confiscation 25% of the time, nor 50% of the time, but 100% of the time. 

[/list]
If Trump is not re-elected, what does this tell you? If you are still not sure, perhaps you should review the University of Hawaii report and everyone should consider other historical precedents in this area. 
Previously, we allowed the Obama administration to strip away our most of the provision for the last line of defense from an increasingly totalitarian government, by acquiescing to the United Nations and American advocates for gun control, perhaps we should examine the end game resulting from past gun control efforts:  
1. In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915-1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves against their ethnic-cleansing government, were arrested and exterminated.
2. In 1929, the former Soviet Union established gun control as a means of controlling the "more difficult" of their citizens. From 1929 to the death of Stalin, 40 million Soviets met an untimely end at the hand of various governmental agencies as they were arrested and exterminated.
3. After the rise of the Nazi's, Germany established their version of gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, the mentally ill, and others, who were unable to defend themselves against the "Brown Shirts", were arrested and exterminated. Interestingly, the Brown Shirts were eventually targeted for extermination themselves following their blind acts of allegiance to Hitler. Any American military and police would be wise to grasp the historical significance of the Brown Shirts' fate.
4. After Communist China established gun control in 1935, an estimated 50 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves against their fascist leaders, were arrested and exterminated.
5. Closer to home, Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayans, unable to defend themselves against their ruthless dictatorship, were arrested and exterminated.
6. Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves from their dictatorial government, were arrested and exterminated.
7. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million of the "educated" people, unable to defend themselves against their fascist government, were arrested and exterminated.
8. In 1994, Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves from their totalitarian government, nearly one million were summarily executed. The total numbers of victims who lost their lives because of gun control is approximately 70 million people in the 20th century. The historical voices from 70 million corpses speak loudly and clearly to those Americans who are advocating for a de facto gun ban. Governments murderedfour times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined. Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals and it all followed gun control.   Historically, American gun control legislation has been imitating Hitler's Nazi Germany gun control legislation for quite some time. Consider the key provisions of the Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 and compare it with the United States Gun Control Act of 1968. The parallels of both the provisions and the legal language are eerily similar.

The Nazi Weapons Act of 1938		United States Gun Control Act of 1968
1	Classified guns for sporting purposes	1	Introduced term "sporting purpose"
2	All Germans desiring to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and submit to a background check	2	Exempted government agencies from the controls which applied to law-abiding citizens
3	The law assumed that non-Nazi German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazi's from the gun control law	3	The Law assumes that mentally ill people will turn their guns on innocents and the government is given the power to limit the purchase by people DEEMED to be a threat by labeling them as mentally ill.
4	The Nazi's assumed unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not, be owned by private persons	4	Authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to decide what firearms could or could not be owned by private persons
5	The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by governmental bureaucrats	5	The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by governmental bureaucrats
6	Citizens under 18 years of age could not buy firearms and ammunition	6	Age restriction of 18 years and 21 years were applied to anyone who wished to purchase firearms and ammunition

And then of course, Obama, before leaving office signed on to the UN Small Arms Treaty which outlawed ALL guns. How clear does it have to be?
If America allows the Democrats, by hook or by crook, to ever occupy the White House, Americans will surely see gun confiscation which, according to history, will result in Genocide. 
Thomas Jefferson was very clear in his writings regarding the right to bear arms. Jefferson knew that the preservation of the Republic ultimately rested upon a well-armed citizenry. Jefferson felt it was absolutely necessary for American citizens to be able to protect themselves.
The protection that Jefferson spoke of was not from our obvious enemies of the day (France and Britain), but from our own government. Jefferson made this point quite clear when he admonished future generations of Americans to fulfill their duty to overthrow a government if they failed to serve the needs of the majority of its citizens. Private ownership of guns is the necessary component needed to fulfill the Jeffersonian mandate for national self-defense. Yet, increasingly and reminiscent of Nazi Germany, the United States government is incrementally chipping away at private citizens right to own a gun. This does doesn't make sense because, as previously stated, the FBI statistics clearly show that 90% of the guns used in the commission of a crime are stolen! Does the government really believe that criminals, both American citizens and illegal aliens, as well as terrorists, are suddenly going to perform their civic duty and immediately register their guns? How is America better-served if the only ones who don't have access to guns are the law-abiding citizens? So, one must ask who are the gun control laws designed to protect and why? Yet, this Democratic Party's utopia will become America's genocidal nightmare.