Dove Super Elite
Posts : 82419 Reputation : 524 Join date : 2011-08-18
| Subject: Nancy Goofed? Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:23 am | |
| This gets it's own thread cuz this could be fun to watch. She's got more than her dentures flapping in the wind. Paul Sperry
Follow
[ltr]@paulsperry_[/ltr]
MoreDEVELOPING: Speaker Pelosi may have blown Democrats' chances of successfully prosecuting President Trump with a statement she made during her interview with CBS' "60 Minutes" last night----She said she knew about the phone call. How did she know? Spying? -----It's interesting that Schiff tweets about the "scandal" weeks before congress was a aware of it, Pelosi slips and says she knew what was in the call before it was released, and the rules for whistle blowers was changed to included 2nd hand info. ----YES—yes she did. Nancy said she knew what was in the call prior to President Trump releasing the transcript.
She tried to cover for her slip by saying it was in the public domain—but in reality, it was NOT. ------- I want to know the thoughts of God. Everything else is just details. A Miracle is when God makes His Reality our Experience
| |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: What part of the following do Nancy Pelosi and the news media not understand? Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:22 am | |
| https://thedailycoin.org/2019/09/30/civil-war-on/ Civil War OnBY JAMES HOWARD KUNSTLER · PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 · UPDATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019Civil War On by James Howard KunstlerSomeone in Impeachmentville is not paying attention. Of course, diverting the rubes is exactly the point of the latest CIA operation to negate the 2016 election. Has nobody noticed that there is treaty between Ukraine and the USA, signed at Kiev in 1998 and ratified by the US Senate in 2000. It’s an agreement on “Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.” Here, read the cover letter for yourself:What part of the following do Nancy Pelosi and the news media not understand? - Quote :
- The Treaty is self-executing. It provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restraint, confiscation, forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the requested state… ([etc].
How does this not permit Mr. Trump asking the president of Ukraine for “assistance” in criminal matters arising out of “collusion with Russia,” as specified within the scope of Robert Mueller’s special prosecutor activities? For instance, the matter of CrowdStrike. The cybersecurity firm was co-founded by Russian ex-pat Dmitri Alperovitch, who also happens to be a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, an anti-Russian think tank funded by Ukrainian billionaire, Viktor Pinchuk, who donated at least $25 million to the Clinton Foundation before the 2016 election. Crowdstrike was the company that “examined” the supposedly hacked DNC servers, while somebody in the Obama administration prevented the FBI from ever seeing them. Does this sound a little like part of the origin story of RussiaGate? Is that not exactly the potential criminal matter that the current attorney general, Mr. Barr, is officially investigating? Continue Reading / Kunstler >>> |
|