REPOST OF FIRE AND D.-E.-W.

Conclusion

The California Firestorm psyop has many purposes.  Selling the global population on the hoax known as CO2-driven climate change is a HUGE reason for these apocalyptic fires.  That’s why they were so disastrous and why the media has so misrepresented their real causes.
For those who wish to understand the true causation of these geoengineered wildfires, the following links provide the hidden back story.

Here’s how the globalists and geoengineers conspired to manufacture the apocalyptic California firestorms

SMART Meters Being Used To Implode Buildings in California During Firestorms

OPERATION TORCH CALIFORNIA: A Special Report on the Firestorm Terror Operation

CALIFORNIA FIRESTORMS GEOENGINEERED: Here’s why and who’s doing it

Who is firebombing California and why?

Cosmic Convergence Research Group
November 16, 2018
___
http://cosmicconvergence.org/?p=28337

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=108712

Here’s how they did it

---

(Source: Here’s how the globalists and geoengineers conspired to manufacture the apocalyptic California firestorms)

---

The people must respond to this attack

State of the Nation has posted more content concerning these attacks on California than any other website on the Internet.  Given the considerable amount and high quality of so much hard evidence confirming this CA crime wave, it’s inconceivable that so few residents have coalesced around a people-powered, grass-roots driven initiative to get to the bottom of it.

SOTN Editor’s Note:  Proof has been presented via the hard scientific evidence provided by Nexrad Radar, Autocad Civil 3D, Modis 6 and VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) satellite hot-spot data that microwaves produced from 3 GWEN stations were utilized to trigger California’s devastating Camp Fire.  What follows are 2 screenshots showing the cluster of microwaves that were transmitted throughout the exact area where the Camp Fire exploded.

---

Enlarge this image Click to see fullsize

---

Enlarge this image Click to see fullsize

---

GWEN Stations: The Preferred Weapon of Pyro-terrorism

Now here’s a real-time video of the Camp Fire getting hit by microwaves just as the fire was getting started and spreading.  Pay special attention to the blips on the screen that occur in the northwest quadrant of the screen which are surreptitiously emanating from one of the GWEN stations.

Despite the enormous promise of solar power, the drawbacks of the technology remain significant. People need electricity every day, around the clock, but there’s no part of the United States that is cloud-free 365 days a year — and no solar radiation at night. You have to find some way to store the energy for those sunless periods, and there’s not yet a large-scale way to do that.

Moreover, the best locations for solar arrays — the deserts of the American Southwest — are far from the centers of population, so even under the best of circumstances you’d have to send electricity many hundreds of miles through transmission lines that don’t yet exist.

But there is a way to tap into the sun’s energy 24 hours a day, every day of the year, and send it anywhere on the globe: Launch solar panels into space and beam the power back to Earth.

The concept sounds far-fetched and wildly impractical, and when the Pentagon and space enthusiasts began talking about it back in the 1960s and 1970s, it was. Recently, however, the idea of space-based solar power, or SBSP, has begun to look less like science fiction and more like a technology whose time may be coming, with the Pentagon and private companies ramping up efforts to make space-based solar power a reality.

Image Gallery

Â:copyright:Mafic Studios, Inc.
HOW IT WORKS: Beaming space-based solar power back to Earth
Two years ago, the Pentagon’s National Security Space Office (NSSO) issued a report recommending that the U.S. “begin a coordinated national program to develop SBSP.” A year ago, engineers did a small but successful experiment using some of the technology that will be employed in SBSP, taking energy from solar cells, converting it to microwaves, and then beaming it 92 miles from Maui to the Big Island of Hawaii, where it was converted back into 20 watts worth of electricity.
And last spring, the California-based Solaren Corporation signed a contract with Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) to provide 200 megawatts of power  — about half the output of an average coal-fired power plant — by 2016 by launching solar arrays into space. Several other companies have announced their intentions to put up solar satellites of their own.
Doubts abound that space-based solar power will come to pass anytime soon, and for good reason: The technology involves launching a series of large satellites into space, using robotic technology to assemble the solar arrays, transmitting the energy 22,000 miles to earth using microwave technology, and then converting that energy to electricity on the ground.

Quote :

[size=32]The question is whether this engineering feat can be pulled off at a price competitive with terrestrial solar power.[/size]

The fact is, however, that all of that is now feasible — if pricey — thanks to technological advances in recent years. These include cheaper and more reliable launch technology, lighter and stronger materials for solar stations, significant improvements in the robotic technology needed to assemble the solar arrays, far more efficient solar cells, more precise digital devices to direct that energy accurately to earth, and significantly smaller and more powerful microwave transmitters and receivers.
The big question is whether this engineering feat can be pulled off at a price competitive with terrestrial solar power. So far, the Pentagon’s estimate of what it will cost — $10 billion to put a 10-megawatt experimental solar station in orbit by 2016 — is five times higher than Solaren’s and would produce far less power.
A number of factors are driving the renewed interest in space-based solar power, including the push to cut greenhouse-gas emissions and growing interest from the military. But neither of these forces would mean much if the technology was outrageously expensive or too impractical.
It was a little bit of both when SBSP was first proposed in 1968 by an engineer named Peter Glaser, who worked for the consulting firm Arthur D. Little on a variety of space-related projects. The basic components — solar cells and microwave transmitters and receivers — already existed, and as the Apollo program began to wind down, NASA was trying to figure out what to do next.
In particular, says John Mankins, who became the manager for advanced concepts for NASA during the 1990s, “They were trying to figure out what to do with the space shuttle.” One idea was to begin launching space habitats — to get large numbers of people living and working in space. “These people would need something to do,” says Mankins, “so one idea was that they’d build solar-power satellites.”
Studies showed that it was a feasible, but daunting, proposition. “This was in the days before PCs, microelectronics, robotics,” says Mankins. “The idea of something like the shuttle’s robotic arm was unimaginable. So you’d need these big crews to bolt the things together — and the satellites themselves would have had to be physically enormous. We’d need a new launch system that would dwarf the space shuttle.”

Quote :

[size=32]At 22,000 miles up, a geostationary satellite is in full sunlight virtually all the time.[/size]

The bottom line, he says, was that it could be done, but it would have cost the equivalent of a trillion of today’s dollars to get the first kilowatt of power, and it would have taken 20 years. “The National Research Council and the Office of Technology Assessment looked at it,” recalled Mankins. “One of them said, ‘Let’s revisit this in ten years.’ The other said, ‘Let’s never consider this again.’”
In the mid-1990s, NASA did revisit the concept. Under Mankins’ direction, a team of engineers was assembled to see whether advances in technology made space-based solar power more feasible. “The basic answer,” he says, “was ‘yes.’”
In the past decade two other factors have emerged to boost the prospects of SBSP: climate change and interest from the military.
There is a growing recognition that non-carbon energy sources will be crucial if the world is going to avoid the worst effects of climate change. It’s almost inevitable that carbon emissions will end up being taxed one way or another, and when they are, renewables like SBSP will immediately become more competitive economically.
That’s what motivates Solaren and PG&E. Although it is cloaking its work in secrecy, Solaren has said it will cost roughly $2 billion to launch a handful of satellites carrying the equipment that will be robotically assembled into a single, large solar station. One way the company plans to boost efficiency is to use parabolic reflectors to concentrate sunlight onto the solar cells.
“The biggest expense,” says Cal Boerman, Solaren’s director of energy services, “is the cost of getting into space, and we’re convinced we can get the weight down to the point where we can do this with a minimum number of launches.”

Quote :

[size=32]Solaren eventually wants to put in orbit satellites that can generate enough electricity for 1 million homes.[/size]

As with any SBSP system, the energy will be converted into microwaves and beamed down to a so-called rectenna — an antenna that “rectifies” the microwaves back into electricity. Solaren’s, to be located near Fresno, Calif., will consist of an array of smaller antennas that will cover about a square kilometer — far less real estate than you’d need if you were using ground-based solar cells to gather an equivalent amount of power.
Because Solaren’s satellite will be in geostationary orbit, the antennas won’t have to track it across the sky; like a satellite TV receiver, they’ll always aim at a fixed point in the sky. At 22,000 miles up, a geostationary satellite is in full sunlight virtually all the time.
As for safety, he says, the fact that the microwaves are spread out over a square kilometer means that they’d be relatively harmless to, say, a flock of birds that happened to fly through them. And if the beam should wander, the satellite will be programmed to scatter it.
Solaren isn’t the only company trying to commercialize SBSP: PowerSat, based in Everett, Wash., has recently filed patents for its own space-power system, which will use an array of hundreds of small satellites linked together rather than one large one. PowerSat says it can reduce some of the high costs of putting the technology in space by using solar energy to power electronic thrusters to maneuver the satellites into orbit. A Swiss company, Space Energy, is also working on SBSP. Solaren is the only one, though, with a contract with a utility. “As we talked to investors,” says Boerman, “they naturally asked, ‘Can you sell it?’”
If this first project works out, Solaren eventually wants to put in orbit satellites that can generate a gigawatt of electricity, enough to power roughly 1 million homes.
Such futuristic schemes have understandably generated a great deal of skepticism. Space experts have been debating the issue online, with some arguing that Solaren’s project will be far more expensive than the company estimates, in part because it could take more than a dozen launches — not just four, as the company stated — to get the solar station into space.
But the military’s interest in SBSP could give a major boost to the technology. According to Marine Corps Lt. Col. Paul Damphousse, Chief of Advanced Concepts for the National Security Space Office, the military is interested in SBSP for two main reasons.

Quote :

[size=32]By being an early customer, the government can rapidly accelerate development of the technology.[/size]

The first, he said, is that “we’re obviously interested in energy security, and we’re also interested in weaning ourselves off fossil fuels because climate change could pose national security risks.” But there would also be a tactical advantage to space-based solar, Damphousse noted. When the military is operating in remote regions of countries like Iraq or Afghanistan, it uses diesel generators to supply forward bases with power.
“We have a significant footprint getting energy in,” says Damphousse, noting the need for frequent convoys of oil tankers, the soldiers to protect them, and air support — all of which is expensive and dangerous.
Being able to tap into power beamed directly down from space would clearly have a lot of appeal, says Damphousse, even if it were relatively costly. And it’s not just useful for the battlefield, he says, but also for areas affected by natural disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina.
For those reasons, Damphousse supports the idea of coordinated studies by the Pentagon and other agencies — such as NASA and the Department of Energy — that would have a stake in space-based power.
“We might, for example, do some experiments on the International Space Station, which is already up there and generating 110 kilowatts of power from its own solar cells,” he says, “rather than having to send up a dedicated test satellite.”
Such cooperation might appeal to NASA. “I suspect that NASA will start working on energy and on more advanced technology and less on, ‘Let’s get to the moon by 2018,’” says Mankins.
By undertaking some of the research and being an early customer for SBSP, the government could rapidly accelerate development of the technology. Historians of aviation agree that the government’s decision to back air mail played a major role in developing the aircraft industry, leading to technological innovations and economies of scale. The same phenomenon could take an emerging but outlandish-sounding technology and push it into the energy mainstream.

https://www.permanent.com/solar-powersat-satellites.html

https://www.permanent.com/solar-powersat-satellite-concept.html = LINKS TO RIGHT ALSO

https://www.permanent.com/solar-powersat-satellite-beam-environment-beam.html
(DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE WORKERS..?
"Since there appear to be no intrinsic, metagenic or carcinogenic effects of microwaves [below exhorbitantly high levels], the problem of such effects can be dismissed for the ordinary level of exposure of human [workers] within the rectenna area of SPS (0.01 to 1.0 mW/cm²)." (120)
"Overall, the epidemiologic evidence does not offer any reliable evidence that the ordinary level of exposure of humans within the rectenna area of SPS (0.01 to 1.0 mW/cm²) would cause any harm." (123)
They looked at the most sensitive elements of the human body, e.g., pregnant mothers working below or even above the rectenna:
"In summary, teratogenic (fetal and baby development) effects of microwaves appear to occur reliably only at relatively high power-density levels, probably greater than 23 mW/cm². In relation to the problem of SPS, it appears very likely that neither the ordinary level of exposure of humans (0.01 to 1.0 mW/cm²) nor the maximum level (23 mW/cm²) would cause any teratogenic effects in humans." (121)
"Within the rectenna area of SPS, neither the exposure ... nor the maximum exposure (23 mW/cm²) has any realistic probability of inducing [a serious health problem] in workers in the area." (122)
"For humans and animals outside the SPS rectenna site, it would seem that effects on the nervous system are unlikely. Beneath the rectenna panels, the power density is also probably too low to expect effects on the nervous system." (124)
"Microwaves would have no effect on evoked [brain voltages] or EEGs [i.e., electroencephalographs]. For ordinary exposure within the rectenna area (0.1 to 1.0 mW/cm²) there is little or no probability of an effect on either blood-brain barrier or brain histology [i.e., the microscopic structure of tissue]." (125) (There was a report on the effects of certain modulated microwaves on the blood-brain barrier that was read far and wide, unrelated to SPSs.)
"Workers in the rectenna area exposed at the ordinary power density level (0.01 to 1.0 mW/cm²) would probably not experience any effect on performance of trained tasks or speed of learning..." (126)

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/whats-next-solar-energy-how-about-space-180961008/
[size=33]What’s Next for Solar Energy? How About Space[/size]

Scientists are closer than ever to making the far-out concept of a space-based solar collection system a reality

Read more: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/whats-next-solar-energy-how-about-space-180961008/#pLp2g51pFhEWwDpZ.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

http://www.altenergy.org/new_energy/space-solar-power.html


Space Based Solar Power, solar power satellite (SPS) concept
One of the major hurdles holding solar power back is the inherent intermittency issues that come with having an atmosphere over your head. Solar cells on the Earth's surface can only generate electricity when the sun is in the sky, and for many countries, especially those in the Northern hemisphere, constant cloud cover can put a damper on a solar economy. But what if you could bypass the atmosphere altogether, what if you could harness solar energy directly from the sun, in space. In 1941 science fiction writer Issac Assimov spoke of space stations that could transport energy gathered from the sun to various planets with the microwave beams in his short story "Reason." Today, science fiction could become science fact within the next quarter of a century, at least according to Dr. Susumu Sasaki of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA). In April of 2014 JAXA released a proposal for a series of ground and orbital experiments that could lead to the development of a functioning space based solar power system by the 2030s.

History of Space Based Solar Power

The idea of collecting solar power in space is nothing new. It did not take long after the invention of the first silicon-based solar cells and the advent of space exploration for someone to realize that the two technologies would make a happy marriage. American aerospace engineer Peter Glaser penned the first formal proposal for a space based solar power system in 1968, just a year shy of Neil Armstrong's stroll across the moon. He was granted patent number 3,781,647 for a satellite solar-power system (SSPS) in 1973 for a method of transporting solar power over long distances by beaming microwaves from an antenna in space onto a much larger one on the ground. The ground receiver would later be called a rectenna. Glaser, who was vice president of Arthur D. Little, Inc. landed a contract with NASA to lead a more comprehensive study in 1974. The initial report was enough to make NASA fund research and development into the project during the 70's and 80's. A change in administrations would ultimately put a hiatus on further development of the idea. The Office of Technology Assessment concluded that there were too many unknowns regarding the technical and economic aspects of a space based solar power system.

NASA would not take another serious look at Space Based Solar Power until 1999, with its Space Solar Power Exploratory Research and Technology (SERT) program. They laid some of the groundwork for solar power satellite (SPS) concept, using a geosynchronous orbit, and established general feasibility and design requirements. Their SPS concept entailed a gigawatt space power system with inflatable photovoltaic gossamer structure, which utilizes solar heat engines to generate electricity. A key lesson that came out of this study was that launch costs for low earth orbit would have to fall to the $100 - 200 USD per kilogram range for the construction of an SPS to become feasible. Fast forward to May, 2014 and JAXA is picking up where they left off. Let's take a closer look at the latest road map to space based solar power.

The Goal

Every roadmap needs a destination, and for space based solar power, JAXA has proposed a commercially viable 1 gigawatt space based solar power system.
The system would consist of a geosynchronous orbiting satellite outfitted with state of the art silicon based solar cells. Orbital mirrors ensure that sunlight is always concentrated onto the satellite's solar panels as it orbits with the Earth's rotation, even when it resides on the side of Earth opposite the sun. On the surface a 3 kilometer long man-made island outfitted with 5 billion miniature rectifying antennas receives the microwaves beamed down from a satellite 36,000 kilometers above, converting them back into DC current. An on-island substation routes electricity through an undersea cable directly to Tokyo's bustling electrical grid. An ambitious project, Dr. Sasaki highlights six areas of development: wireless power transmission, space transportation, space construction, satellite control, power generation and power management.

Wireless Power Transmission

At the end of the 19th century, Nikola Tesla began construction of his famous 57-meter tower at Wardenclyffe on New York's Long Island North Shore. His intention was to build a prototype transmission tower for wireless power, but budget cuts in 1904 and debt collectors would ultimately prevent him from realizing his dream.
Fast forward to the present and today we know that wireless transmission over long distances can be implemented in one of two methods: lasers and microwaves. The first, lasers is not feasible for space based power transmission for the same reason we would want to place solar collectors above the atmosphere in the first place; the clouds would absorb or scatter the laser beam. If space based solar is going to work, it has to be via microwaves.

How to Transfer Energy using Microwaves

The core technology that could make space based solar power a reality is the ability to convert solar DC current into microwaves onboard the satellite, beam them down to earth, and convert them back into DC current on the ground. Let's start with generating microwaves on the satellite.

Microwave Generation

To generate microwaves, DC current supplied from a photovoltaic cell can be directed to magnetrons, klystrons, or other vacuum tubes to convert electricity into a microwave. Vacuum tubes use the ballistic motion of electrons under the influence of oscillating magnetic fields to generate microwaves. There exists a tradeoff between using lower frequency microwaves for easier penetration of the atmosphere and higher frequency microwaves for decreasing the size of the antennas. Candidates for the transmission frequency are therefore 2.45 and 5.8 GHz. The 1 GW commercial space based solar power system JAXA plans to construct would require at least 100 million 10 watt semiconductor amplifiers.

Microwave Receiver

On the surface a rectifying antenna or rectenna is required to receive the microwaves from space and convert them back into DC current. In its simplest iteration, a rectenna consists of a dipole antenna equipped with an RF diode. The microwaves induce an AC current in the antenna and the rectifier converts the AC current into DC power. This is where the 3 km long island of rectennas comes in. The challenge of course is to directly hit the rectennas head on from the array of antennas 36,000 km in space. Aiming a precise beam of microwaves requires phase matching of an unprecedented scale. The phases of all 1 billion antennas on board the SPS would have to be able to match one another in order to create a beam that can precisely target the rectenna array down below.
JAXA's solution is to improve upon the use of a pilot signal sent from the rectennas on the ground to the antennas in space. Each individual antenna would match its phase to the pilot signal to create a tight beam of microwaves capable of hitting their target.

Converting Microwaves into DC Power

Laboratory tests have been able to achieve 80-95 percent power conversion on both ends. In an ideal scenario, that means you can have access to 90% of the energy harvested by the satellite on the ground. Experimental conversion rates are still more on the order of 54% in the field, so we have a lot of work to do before wireless power transmission becomes viable.
JAXA has already planned a series of demonstrations for the transmission of high power over large distances using microwaves. Researchers are planning to beam hundreds of watts over a distance of 50 meters. The demonstration unit will have four panels that will move in relation to one another to resemble antenna motion in orbit. Each 0.6 m x 0.6 m panel will use hundreds of tiny transmitting antennas and receiving antennas to detect the pilot signal and transmit 400 W carrying a total of 1.6 kW to the rectenna. If successful the receiving rectenna array should be able to generate 350 W of power, which would make it the first successful demonstration of both high power transmission and large distance.

Space Transportation and Construction

Space transportation has seen a lot of press in recent years due to success of companies like SpaceX, Virgin Galactic, and United Launch Alliance. As reusable rockets become a reality, automated docking systems improve, and the costs of launches go down, the feasibility of delivering materials to space for a large scale construction project become more realistic. Construction of the International Space Station sets a precedent for how JAXA might be able build its large SPS in space. Constructing modular pieces on the ground and assembling them in space is already within our capability.
We just need to make the trip to low earth orbit cheaper with reusable rockets and improved launch systems.

Satellite Control

JAXA has come up with two concepts for the solar power satellite that could effectively harvest energy from the sun in Earth's orbit. The first, simpler of the two involves using gravity gradient stabilization to maintain the solar collector's position in Earth's orbit. The satellite would consist of one large panel on the top surface covered with photovoltaic cells and another large panel on the bottom surface covered with transmission antennas. At the center between the two panels is the bus, the unit that houses the satellites communication and control systems. The two panels are tethered to the bus by 10 km long cables. The panel closest to the Earth experiences slightly more gravitational pull than centrifugal force while the upper panel experiences slightly more centrifugal force than gravitational pull. The result is gravity gradient stabilization, a balance of forces that maintains the position of the satellite in Earth's geosynchronous orbit without the need for fuel, a huge cost saving measure.
This basic configuration does have one glaring flaw; the solar collector's orientation is fixed and will lead to huge variations in power generation as the satellite matches the earth's spin. The second configuration therefore adds two giant free flying mirrors that keep sunlight directed at the solar panels 24 hours a day. The free flying mirrors would have to be able to fly in formation, and would require a significant upgrade from the docking maneuvers employed by space agencies today.

They would also have to be constructed out of a lightweight but strong material. It is far more likely that the first implementation would be used initially while formation flying technology and advanced materials are developed.

Power Generation and Management

A space based solar power system of this scale would require a substation on the ground to take the DC power generated from the rectenna array and convert it to AC power for the electrical grid. Fortunately once the power reaches the substation, managing this DC load becomes a standard power plant operation. Submarine power cables would deliver the power from the manmade island to the city's electrical grid.

The Future of Space Based Solar

Critics of a space based solar power system are primarily concerned with the inherent loss of efficiency incurred by the conversion path from a photon to DC current on the ground. The overall losses in efficiency add up at each step of the conversion process. First there is the loss associated with our ability to utilize the photovoltaic effect shared by all solar photovoltaic systems. Then there is the loss of energy from converting DC current into a microwave onboard the satellite, converting into AC current at the rectenna, rectifying it into DC current again to be absorbed by the substation and then finally reconverting it into AC current for distribution to the city grid. Still, the atmosphere coupled with intermittency issues from weather and nightfall is enormous, and could be greater than the power lost from wireless power transmission. SPS's are especially attractive to places like Japan that have limited land and lack fossil fuels.
Time will tell whether technological advances can make it cheaper to harvest solar energy using space based solar power systems
More New Energy:

• Artificial Photosynthesis
  
  
• Space Based Solar Power
  
  
• Arcs, Sparks & Electrons
  
  
• Race for New Energy
  
  
• Universal Forces: Blackholes, Electrogravitics & DeepSpace Propulsion
  
  
• The early pioneers
  
  
• Cold fusion (also known as new hydrogen energy)
  
  
• Zero point energy and other energy
  
  
• Magnetic energy and gravitics
  
  
• Turn Seawater into Jet Fuel
  
  
• Ultra Space Field Theory
  
  
• Ultracapacitors
  
  
• Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusion
  
  

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7616391/PG-E-threatens-cut-power-2-5-million-people-historic-wind-event.html
Possible shut offs on Sat and Sun.

Pictures at link.

Oh yeah and now they are spraying the bugs below.

Chief has some really interesting things on his twitter.  Here's one now.
Who's to say what's a stretch anymore...
Didn't we come away with extreme doubts over China Lake?

Then the other side of the argument is if the magma is so stirred that
it's shooting fire from the manholes, who could do anything underground?

https://twitter.com/chiefpolice2/status/1183470537021911040
----------------

Another piece.  I was rereading Q posts yesterday, looking for more
info on clowns and the chief clown Gina.  The probably helpful link was
dead, but Q talked about her being proficient in Russian.