REMEMBER THE SOVIET MICROWAVE INCIDENT?

Mind Control


REMEMBER THE SOVIET MICROWAVE INCIDENT?


September 28, 2020 By JOSEPH P. FARRELL


You may or may not remember the stories that broke in the American media in the mid-1970s about the Soviets irradiating the American embassy in Moscow with low power microwave radiation. But whether you remember it or not, the topic is pertinent because the US government quietly studied the phenomenon up to the time the irradiation stopped in 1979. The conclusions of these studies were mostly inconclusive, but they did uncover some "nuggets." 


It's pertinent also because of the current environmental and health concerns over the roll-out of 5G and the coming "internet of things", and how better to insure that said roll-out is successful, than to create a planscamdemic, and force people to "lock down" and "socially distance", and thus become reliant upon home delivery services for groceries and so on? (And, while we're on the topic, yes, whatever the magic virus is, it does kill, and no, the response of various governments to it is not proportional to the threat it actually poses, nor is the response of the powers that be based on "science", because their platforms are openly censoring any observation, data, or science that contradicts the WHO-CDC-Fauci-Baal Gates narrative. To put it country simple, the response of governments has not been rational, but hysterical.)


But I digress...


Why am I raising the subject of that Soviet irradiation of the American embassy, and talking about 5G?


It's because of this article kindly passed along by P.A.I., about the Soviet story, and because while the article is a valuable addition to your file on microwave environmental and health effects, there's one thing in particular that caught my eye, and sent my high octane speculation back down some branches of the speculation tree that I've toyed with in previous blogs. Here's the article:


THe Moscow signal epidemiological study, 40 years on


What sent me down previously explored branches of the speculation tree was this:

Quote :

As indicated by the Associated Press (21), referring to this report, Soviet scientists were absolutely convinced of the biological effects of microwaves at low intensities, that radiation could be used as a weapon to disorient and affect the behavior of military and diplomatic personnel, and that it could also be used in interrogations. The report also indicated that radiation could cause heart attacks and affect the blood-brain barrier. As a result, a person could develop severe neuropathological symptoms and even die from the resulting neurological disorders. In addition, Adams and Williams pointed out that reports had emerged from communist countries claiming that women who worked in industrial environments may have suffered miscarriages due to exposure to microwaves.

The Soviet Union extensively investigated the effects of microwaves on people, and found that those exposed frequently developed headaches, loss of appetite, tiredness, difficulty in concentration, poor memory, emotional instability and labile cardiovascular function. These effects were found at lower intensities than those that caused problems due to tissue heating (22). (All emphases added)

And then there's this little punch to the solar plexus:

Quote :

It was certainly suspicious that the Soviets had a maximum exposure level 1000 times lower than that of the Americans. What did the USSR know about the effects of microwaves that the US did not know?

Yes, that's right folks: the Soviet regulations for maximum ambient microwave radiation set a threshold three orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding American limits in the same time frame. And the article hints at the reason for this, both with its question "What did the USSR know about the effects of microwaves that the US did not know?" but also with its observation that "Soviet scientists were absolutely convinced of the biological effects of microwaves at low intensities."


What this article misses is the massive amount of research gathered and published by retired US Army Lt. Col. Tom Bearden in a fascinating book titled Gravitobiology, a book detailed Cold War era Russian research into what might equally be called not "gravitobiology" but "electromagnetic-template biology." Without going into all the how's, why's, and wherefore's covered in Bearden's fascinating book, basically the Soviet research can be summed up as follows: Soviet scientists discovered that (1) all diseases or diseased cells in a tissue carry a unique electromagnetic signature or "template", as does all healthy tissue; (2) these templates could be reproduced or approximated by multiple wave-mixing or interferometry of waves in the radio-microwave end of the electromagnetic spectrum at low intensity; and (3) tissue exposed to an environment where a selected template is being broadcast will eventually be more likely to develop the disease of that template (or conversely, if already with a specific disease, revert to health if exposed to the electromagnetic "signature" of healthy cells).  In effect, the Soviets had created a "bio-electric library" of these templates, much like in this country, scientists worked for various government agencies created "electro-encephalographic disctionaries" of brainwaves patterns associated with specific words as well as emotions, and a capacity both to read such brainwaves remotely, but also to project such patterns sequentially via microwaves, directly into a brain. Or, for that matter, much like the claims of Dr. royal Raymon Rife in American, or Alain Priore in France. Note, once again, that microwaves are the culprits, and again, at low intensity.


Note, too, that in the Soviet research these templates are formed by wave mixing, by interferometry, and that in turn requires more than one broadcast source or antenna. And this, of course, is exactly what we have with cell towers and 5G towers, which, at the flip of a button, could be turned into a local, regional, or much larger interferometer.


... now just add some nanoparticles to your vaccine, specially designed to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and to make transmission more efficient by, oh, say, some particulate heavy metal (like colloidal silver perhaps), and you get the idea...


... but there's more...


See you on the flip side...

Also from Joseph Farrell today. It ties in with the today’s article. This video is absolutely hypnotizing - and scary. Think about brain sync in a given crowd. Think of the hive mind. Think of the Borg of Star Trek fame. Think about what is happening in America right before our eyes today.

Remember this Obama campaign mantra being repeated by glassy-eyed sheep endlessly:

Hope, change. Yes we can.
Hope, change. Yes we can.
Hope, change. Yes we can.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
TIDBIT: AND WHILE WE’RE TALKING ABOUT RESONANCE …
September 28, 2020 By Joseph P. Farrell
And apropos of today's main blog (though I leave it to you to figure out why), S.S. submitted this short video of a resonance property and self-organizing systems):
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v5eBf2KwF8
 

Oh gosh.  One post that's still swimming in my head is about electo-magnetism, frequency, vibration, resonance, harmony and discord...

Not only regarding health, but also WHY it could be that taking the mark prohibits one from attaining heaven.

Here's the science side of it in a nutshell.  The DAY must be close, indeed.

NOTHING FAR FETCHED ANYMORE IS THERE

This reminds me of soldiers in formation  ...

You Tell Me


DREADFUL DREADDS?


September 29, 2020 By JOSEPH P. FARRELL


Yesterday I blogged about the story of the Soviet irradiation of the American embassy in Moscow from the 1950's  to the 1970's, drawing some disturbing connections not only to the ability of low intensity microwave radiation to manipulate the mind and cause disease, but also the converse, to inculcate health is diseased tissue. Furthermore, I explored a speculation I have entertained often during the Fauci-Baal Gates-Wuhan planscamdemic narrative, that being we might be witnessing the "beta-test" of a bio-electrically activated phenomenon, i.e., of a virus activated only by or in an electro-magnetic template of some sort. In the past, I've connected this idea to the arrest of Harvard chemistry professor Dr. Charles Lieber for allegedly not disclosing to federal authorities his financial relationship to the Chinese virology laboratory in Wuhan, site of the original covid outbreak. Lieber's specialty was nanotechnology. Additionally I have also connected that speculation to Baal Gates' stated goal of a vaccine that would also contain a tracking system, and which would automatically "update" itself with "downloads" much like the annoying "business model" of Microsoft windows updates.


And as I indicated yesterday, there's more to my speculations, this time provided by a gem of a find spotted by a regular reader here, P.T., and passed along. This one is worthy of your very close attention:


DREADDs: The Power of the Lock, the Weakness of the Key. Favoring the Pursuit of Specific Conditions Rather than Specific Ligands


As the article notes, DREADDS stands for "designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs," that is, specifically designed or modified cellular receptors - genetically modified cells - to make them active in the presence of drugs designed to activate them.


While the article is intensively technical, it is worth noting that the focus of this research is concerned with breaching the blood-brain barrier, and that in the process, behavioral modifications have been noticed. And it's a short step from noticing to manipulating:

Quote :

Third, and the most critical point, conventional pharmacological controls must be used. The same philosophy as in pharmacology should be applied, and, as for neurobiological experiments, groups of transgenic animals without expressing DREADDs (e.g., DREADDs empty viral vectors) must be integrated to verify the selective effects of the ligand and chosen dose (Smith et al., 2016, Campbell and Marchant, 2018; Mahler and Aston-Jones, 2018; for an example of experimental studies following this design, see also Xia et al., 2017; Cope et al., 2019). This statement may appear trivial, but the pursuit of an absolute selective ligand and the attractiveness of this approach have already led to some overconfident behavioral studies, sometimes conducted in the complete absence of this control.

In conclusion, DREADDs provide a precise way of manipulating neural circuits and behavior, and afford a great alternative to optogenetics to tonically manipulate a specific cellular subpopulation, thus opening exciting new avenues of research.

So, let's incorporate what we have here, with what I blogged about yesterday, and the whole idea of an electromagnetically-activated virus or disease. And yes, this is once again some really high octane speculation. We have already heard reports, for example, of nuerological effects associated with covid-19, not only with the virus itself but, in the UK, with "vaccines" being tested there. I've suggested that Dr. Charles Lieber, the Harvard chemistry professor arrested by the federal government for allegedly not disclosing his financial ties to the Chinese virology laboratory in Wuhan, whose expertise in nanotechnology could conceivably be a factor in rendering any pathogen more efficient, could also be a vehicle for rendering any counter-agent more efficient, especially in terms of vectors of delivery. Similarly, I've suggested that particulate metals would render any electromagnetic component of either a pathogen or a counter-agent more efficient.


Now, we can add a third component: DREADDS, a pharmacological-genetic component, plus designer drugs designed to activate them. Mix and stir some microwave interferometry in the form of 5G towers, and voila, one can create all sorts biologically targeted mischief...


See you on the flip side...

Mind Control

DREADING THOSE DREADFUL DREADDS


October 1, 2020 By JOSEPH P. FARRELL


Yes, you read the title of this blog correctly; we're back to talking about DREADDS, an aptly chosen acronym meaning designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs.


  The receptors in view are neurons in the brain, and the whole idea is to use "chemogenetics" to help deliver drugs past the blood brain barrier. Sounds wonderful; it will improve health; it's "for the children."


And indeed, it may be wonderful and health-improving and even for the children. Except that "C." spotted this article and passed it along (and our thanks for doing so!). In it, you'll read the following things:

Quote :

The phrase “mind-control drugs” probably conjures up some terrifying images, but in the case of chemogenetics, it could be cause for rejoicing. To study the brain in any useful level of detail requires precise targeting of neural circuits, no easy task in an organ that’s basically a thicket of long, interconnected cells—cells that send and receive a profusion of electrical and chemical signals.

The idea behind chemogenetics is simple: create a receptor that reacts only to a pharmacologically inert ligand, that doesn’t do anything in the body. Then, stick that receptor into the particular neurons you want to influence. Once the cells start expressing the receptor, inject the ligand to activate the neurons, or inhibit them, depending on your receptor, with no unintended effects in other cells. (Emphasis added)

There you have it, and have it pretty clearly stated, too. 


DREADDS are about "mind-control drugs" which has a genetic component - the design of the receptor - to which is added a drug which, due to the special genetic composition of the receptor, won't affect the rest of the body.


But wait, there's more, and I can imagine Baal and Malicious Fates rubbing their hands together, twirling their mustaches, and cackling with glee and a soft, icy voice like Peter Lorre:

Quote :

These days, Dr. Roth and his team are working to develop new DREADDs, with an eye to multiplexing. “We’d like to be able, if they’re going to be used in humans, to have activating and inhibiting DREADDs in the same neuron,” Dr. Roth says. This could be a way to exert fine control over treatment of symptoms that vary throughout the day, or to manipulate multiple neuronal circuits simultaneously.

Chemogenetics isn’t the only way to target brain cells for activation: optogenetics allows researchers to activate or suppress neuron activity with pulses of light. The two technologies have different strengths, Dr. Roth points out, and many researchers use both.

“Optogenetics is very good if you want millisecond control,” he notes. Chemogenetics, on the other hand, is easier to use, and more practical for activating larger populations of neurons. Instead of implanting light fibers all over the brain, “you can put the drug in the drinking water,” Dr. Roth explains, and simultaneously activate all the cells containing your DREADD, wherever they are located. (Emphasis added)

Well, shucks. Why bother with old-fashioned syringes then?


Perhaps I should explain my previous remark, and in the process, offer today's high octane speculation. You'll note that the designer receptor is specifically designed for specific neural receptors. Presumably, that means also for a specific individual or at least, an individual or group with certain specific genetic traits. In turn, and extrapolating a bit on the development of this technology and projecting that it acquires great specificity, if one were to put DREADDs into the water supply, a specific designer drug would only affect those with a specific receptor type. So, pretending we're Baal or Malicious Gates, cackling on our yacht and twirling our mustaches and dreaming of a global vaccine, we decide we don't like the way green-eyed or red-headed people are behaving, and we want to turn them into "caring loving" sheeple devoid of independent thought and strong passions.


 So we design receptors accordingly, and slip a little mickey into the water supply (which implies, of course, that water becomes a commodity we can trade on the commodities market and make more money from. But that's an entirely different story.).


Et voila, le probleme est resolu. (Pardon my lack of accents).


But of course, to do this, one would have to build a massive human DNA database and sneak our acquisition of their DNA under the cover of... oh, I don't know... say a planscamdemic where we force everyone to get "tested" by ramming Q tips into their nasal cavity. And while we're dropping mickeys into the water supply, we could also stir in a little nanotechnology to help out those receptors and designer drugs, and maybe design them so that they function much more efficiently, or are even activated by, a certain type of signal or electromagnetic field. So we could have DREADDS functioning in concert with EMADDS (electro-magnetically activated designer drugs) and (insert Emperor Palpatine voice or Peter Lorre voice here) "at last we shall have peace."


Uh huh.


See you on the flip side...