Birth of new royal baby

Has just been announced on SKY TV 9.00 pm news, that a new royal baby ... a BOY, has been born to  the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge ( Catherine and William Wales) at 4.24 pm this afternoon, mother and baby doing well. I am sure they are delighted.

The Anti-Christ?

Congratulations to them! I bet they'll be doting parents. That's a plus for Lady Catherine, having a boy, I wonder what they are going to name him?

Can't wait to see a pic of the little tyke. Bet he's a cutie. Congrats to the loving couple.

They don't qualify to be royal.
The Brits are sleeping as well.

Presented at 7:13 BST (7+3+1=11) at St. Mary's Hospital.

7-23-2013 (7+2+3+2+1+4=18)

Discern & draw your own conclusions.

*

Valiant would be a cool name for the new prince.

Prince Valiant, King Arthur! You guys are killin me! LOL, I really hope the little guy's numbers don't end up being the illuminati death numbers, like his grandmum's Lady Diana.

quietobserver wrote:

Presented at 7:13 BST (7+3+1=11) at St. Mary's Hospital.

7-23-2013 (7+2+3+2+1+4=18)

Discern & draw your own conclusions.

 crazy math,

Are 9  and 2 the bad numbers? 9-11 is kind of weird.

Looks like the new baby's name is Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge.

300

Kitiara wrote:

Looks like the new baby's name is Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge.

GROUNDZERO wrote:

The Anti-Christ?

 Remastered score to Rosemarys Baby announced on the same day the babe was born.

 http://waxworkrecords.com/rosemarys-baby/

Delfi wrote:

quietobserver wrote:

Presented at 7:13 BST (7+3+1=11) at St. Mary's Hospital.

7-23-2013 (7+2+3+2+1+4=18)

Discern & draw your own conclusions.

 crazy math,

I thought the time of his birth was an interesting number 4:24... Not sure what it means tho?

Interesting diameter Done. 33.3 Hm???

Some times I think it's God taking back control, and its another message to the AC that his time is short.

Missing Dave with his explanations.

Proskuneo wrote:

Delfi wrote:

quietobserver wrote:

Presented at 7:13 BST (7+3+1=11) at St. Mary's Hospital.

7-23-2013 (7+2+3+2+1+4=18)

Discern & draw your own conclusions.

 crazy math,

I thought the time of his birth was an interesting number 4:24... Not sure what it means tho?

Interesting diameter Done. 33.3 Hm???

Some times I think it's God taking back control, and its another message to the AC that his time is short.

Missing Dave with his explanations.

 
 Look at the time of the full moon at 33.3  4:16  they say 4:24  8mins after. In that 8mins. she's giving birth.

But the baby was born on July 22nd not the 23rd.

Well peeps, I've been watching this thread since the beginning and so far GROUNDZERO and Jrcole have come closest to my thoughts on this new prince.

The worlds "royals" or "bluebloods" all believe that they are direct decedents of none other than Yeshua, that he DIDN'T die on the tree or cross, and that he fathered children through Mary Magdalene. Evereryone has seen all those Madona and Child paintings. Mother and child, but most don't realize that the mother isn't the Mary of Yeshua's birth but Mary Magdalene and the child isn't Jesus but is really the child of Jesus and Mary M and the start of this royal and blueblood lie.

So just why are we celebrating the birth of another elite royal blueblood who someday will end up ruling over and enslaving us? I just don't get it????

Agreement here, but I pray for the child as in 'their' terms I fear he represents a perfect sacrifice. 'Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge' totals '300'.

Remember the occultic movie '300' where king Leonidus and his 300 (or 299) were sacrificed to delay the Persian onslaught??

Per an old book on blue blooded lizardology:

"300. Mithras.
300. The riches of Korah were so vast that it took 300 mules to carry them.
There were 300 sorts of devils in Sichin.
The Veil of the Temple required 300 priests to draw it aside, and 300 to cleanse it."

It's only 'important' because they chose the child's name, presentation time & date, etc. etc.., probably all part of the scam.

researcher wrote:

Well peeps, I've been watching this thread since the beginning and so far GROUNDZERO and Jrcole have come closest to my thoughts on this new prince.

The worlds "royals" or "bluebloods" all believe that they are direct decedents of none other than Yeshua, that he DIDN'T die on the tree or cross, and that he fathered children through Mary Magdalene. Evereryone has seen all those Madona and Child paintings. Mother and child, but most don't realize that the mother isn't the Mary of Yeshua's birth but Mary Magdalene and the child isn't Jesus but is really the child of Jesus and Mary M and the start of this royal and blueblood lie.

So just why are we celebrating the birth of another elite royal blueblood who someday will end up ruling over and enslaving us? I just don't get it????

Oh, my bad got the date wrong sorry.

http://www.thedrum.com/uploads/drum_basic_article/114516/main_images/PrivateEyeWomanHasBaby.jpg

researcher wrote:

Well peeps, I've been watching this thread since the beginning and so far GROUNDZERO and Jrcole have come closest to my thoughts on this new prince.

The worlds "royals" or "bluebloods" all believe that they are direct decedents of none other than Yeshua, that he DIDN'T die on the tree or cross, and that he fathered children through Mary Magdalene. Evereryone has seen all those Madona and Child paintings. Mother and child, but most don't realize that the mother isn't the Mary of Yeshua's birth but Mary Magdalene and the child isn't Jesus but is really the child of Jesus and Mary M and the start of this royal and blueblood lie.

So just why are we celebrating the birth of another elite royal blueblood who someday will end up ruling over and enslaving us? I just don't get it????

 Because he's just a baby when it's all said and done. I'm happy for any family when they have a baby, this one has two parents of the opposite sex (score for normalcy)and it makes no difference to me if he's a prince. Hey, maybe the young Royals aren't as twisted with that birthright thing as their medieval ancestors. 

It looks like we women on here are lovin on the baby and the men are hating on the family......

Delfi wrote:

researcher wrote:

Well peeps, I've been watching this thread since the beginning and so far GROUNDZERO and Jrcole have come closest to my thoughts on this new prince.

The worlds "royals" or "bluebloods" all believe that they are direct decedents of none other than Yeshua, that he DIDN'T die on the tree or cross, and that he fathered children through Mary Magdalene. Evereryone has seen all those Madona and Child paintings. Mother and child, but most don't realize that the mother isn't the Mary of Yeshua's birth but Mary Magdalene and the child isn't Jesus but is really the child of Jesus and Mary M and the start of this royal and blueblood lie.

So just why are we celebrating the birth of another elite royal blueblood who someday will end up ruling over and enslaving us? I just don't get it????

 Because he's just a baby when it's all said and done. I'm happy for any family when they have a baby, this one has two parents of the opposite sex (score for normalcy)and it makes no difference to me if he's a prince. Hey, maybe the young Royals aren't as twisted with that birthright thing as their medieval ancestors. 

It looks like we women on here are lovin on the baby and the men are hating on the family......

 When are the British royals going to enslave us? In the future? ok

Seems many celebrate independance and then celebrate new rulers?? What's up with that?

GOD made us free.

Isn't this like false idol worship... someone above the true King?
Oh boy, let's all get back to ET or TMZ and worship true STARS.

Well, I've had fun watching the royal family over the years. I find their long history interesting. Maybe because my grandma was from england. IDK?

Our American founding fathers came from England. They took what they got right and fixed what they got wrong and created something better for us. Oddly enough our country is the only place where democracy works. I love America and my God. I'm not worshipping them, just curious.

Babies are cute. They are a bundle of joy. Shouldn't we pour love on all children? We all start out as babies. Even Jesus.

btw... Doesn't gal mean something pretty significant in hebrew?
(back to the conspiracy...)

Proskuneo wrote:

btw... Doesn't gal mean something pretty significant in hebrew?
(back to the conspiracy...)

 

spring2 wrote:

Seems many celebrate independance and then celebrate new rulers?? What's up with that?

GOD made us free.

Isn't this like false idol worship... someone above the true King?
Oh boy, let's all get back to ET or TMZ and worship true STARS.

I think you mean me?
 It's not my ruler and I'm not celebrating over it, This is a lot of sarcasm over a baby. Poor thing, like I always have said about the two princes and now this little one.  Hated from birth by people that will never know them.
I'm sorry to disappoint some of you because I don't share your "dislike" of them. But I have no reason to hate them or their children. 

And so, are you saying I worship them or tmz?  Make some more stuff up why don't you?

*

*

She got Diana's wedding ring?  I read that William refused to wear one. Some radio guy insinuated that she wore the pants in the house but after hearing that, I don't think so. If you can't get your husband to wear a wedding ring, you have no power at all.  It made me feel sad for her.

Catherine always wears her engagement ring that once belonged to Diana, if you look at most of her
photos or appearances at public engagements she usually has it on. I don't see a problem with that, it
is a lovely ring and William gave it to her because he thought so much of her. She also is a 'commoner' and not a 'blueblood'.