quietobserver Super Elite
Posts : 2707 Reputation : 131 Join date : 2013-02-06
| Subject: Newton proven correct (again) Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:39 am | |
| When Newton was experimenting in 'Alchemy' it was considered an occult practice, lead into gold, etc. Everyone laughed from then until recently. The USN & a privately owned company have patented particle transmutation; have done it all under the cover of darkness, and are supposedly working feverishly on ?????????. The patent is legitimate, awarded in April which means the gov't got around to posting it last month or so. Read it for yourself and discern. Supposedly working feverishly on Guam & Oahu so.......or maybe just fix the fed's gold reserves. "For example, the generated particles may be captured by other nuclei to create new elements, may be used to remediate nuclear waste, may be used to create strategic materials, or may be used to treat cancerous tumors." "process involving chemical and, depending upon the substrate, magnetic interaction....... types of particles generated and detected may include, but are not limited to: alpha particles, beta particles, gamma rays, energetic protons, deuterons, tritons, and neutrons. The particles generated by the implementations of method may have various applications" http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PALL&RefSrch=yes&Query=PN/8419919 United States Patent | 8,419,919 | Boss , et al. | April 16, 2013 |
System and method for generating particles [th]Inventors:[/th]Boss; Pamela A. (San Diego, CA), Gordon; Frank E. (San Diego, CA), Szpak; Stanislaw (Poway, CA), Forsley; Lawrence Parker Galloway (San Diego, CA) | [th]Applicant: [/th][th]Name[/th][th]City[/th][th]State[/th][th]Country[/th][th]Type[/th] Boss; Pamela A. Gordon; Frank E. Szpak; Stanislaw Forsley; Lawrence Parker Galloway | San Diego San Diego Poway San Diego | CA CA CA CA | US US US US | |
| [th]Assignee:[/th]JWK International Corporation (Annandale, VA) The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy (Washington, DC)
| [th]Family ID:[/th]48049106 | [th]Appl. No.: [/th]11/859,499 | [th]Filed: [/th]September 21, 2007 |
| |
|
Dove Super Elite
Posts : 91080 Reputation : 524 Join date : 2011-08-18
| Subject: Re: Newton proven correct (again) Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:49 am | |
| There was a program on tv about producing gold in the lab. And they can do it.
But, it costs umpty-ump [U know that word?] dollars more to run the particle
splitters/generators/whatever it was than the quantity of gold was worth.
I find that very amusing.
But still, let's hear it for Newton. Hip-Hip! I want to know the thoughts of God. Everything else is just details. A Miracle is when God makes His Reality our Experience
| |
|
researcher Admin
Posts : 14659 Reputation : 962 Join date : 2011-08-13 Age : 72 Location : San Diego
| Subject: Re: Newton proven correct (again) Tue Aug 20, 2013 2:01 pm | |
| - Dove wrote:
- There was a program on tv about producing gold in the lab. And they can do it.
But, it costs umpty-ump [U know that word?] dollars more to run the particle
splitters/generators/whatever it was than the quantity of gold was worth.
I find that very amusing.
But still, let's hear it for Newton. Hip-Hip! Yeah, I think we both saw the same program. I did a quickie search and found out that mercury had been transmuted in gold in the lab and was actually stable but the cost was out of this world and you didn't get much gold out of it either. Other elements were split apart, bombarded into other elements, etc. etc. but every single attempt other than mercury produced gold that was radioactive. Not exactly something one would want to slip into ones pocket right next to ones family jewels, huh? | |
|
GROUNDZERO
Posts : 461 Reputation : 24 Join date : 2013-03-01
| Subject: Re: Newton proven correct (again) Tue Aug 20, 2013 4:13 pm | |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9oAXPqPWog Now this guy is a total misinfo guy, but listen to what he said about monatomic gold and it's uses...you'll see a common thread. I think there's "some legitimacy" to what he says, but don't take it as law. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Newton proven correct (again) | |
| |
|