Guest Guest
| Subject: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Wed Mar 06, 2013 10:07 am | |
| http://washingtonexaminer.com/eric-holder-drone-strikes-against-americans-on-u.s.-soil-are-legal/article/2523319
Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal
March 5, 2013 | 4:09 pm | Modified: March 5, 2013 at 5:00 pmAttorney General Eric Holder can imagine a scenario in which it would be constitutional to carry out a drone strike against an American on American soil, he wrote in a letter to Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.
“It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” Holder replied in a letter yesterday to Paul’s question about whether Obama “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.”
Paul condemned the idea. “The U.S. Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening – it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans,” he said in a statement. MORE@LINK |
|
Internet Pilgrim
Posts : 471 Reputation : 42 Join date : 2013-02-10 Location : Western Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:22 pm | |
| This came in an email from Rand Paul yesterday:
I've just launched a floor takeover of the U.S. Senate.
My colleagues may want to believe everything is "business as usual" even after yesterday's news. But they're in for something else entirely.
Click on CSPAN if you'd like to watch...
But first, please realize it's never been more important you to stand with me today.
I'm going on a one-man filibuster to stop John Brennan's nomination to the CIA and the RADICAL new claim I received from Attorney General Eric Holder yesterday afternoon...
By now, you've probably heard that Eric Holder finally answered my question saying that President Obama CAN legally order drone strikes – killing American citizens on American soil – at will.
That's without any due process. That's without any judicial oversight.
This cannot be allowed to stand.
When I read Attorney General Holder's letter, I could hardly believe what I was reading.
Isn't government claiming the authority to assassinate its own citizens on its own soil something you hear about in Third World dictatorships?
Has our Republic really sunk this far?
Will Americans see our skies filled with government drones outfitted with missiles meant for us?
Already, domestic spy drones are being outfitted with the ability to track cell phones and detect if law-abiding citizens are carrying firearms.
This is outrageous.
Please sign your Declaration of Rights petition IMMEDIATELY.
| |
|
Delfi Elite
Posts : 1827 Reputation : 169 Join date : 2011-08-11
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:11 pm | |
| Washington Examiner - Quote :
- Attorney General Eric Holder wrote Sen. Rand Paul,R-Ky., to confirm that President Obama does not have the authority to kill an American on U.S. soil in a non-combat situation, Obama’s spokesman announced today.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney quoted from the letter that Holder sent to Paul today. “Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on an American soil?” Holder wrote, per Carney. “The answer is no.” Paul said that was good enough for him. “I’m quite happy with the answer,” he said during a CNN interview. “I’m disappointed it took a month and a half and a root canal to get it, but we did get the answer.” Carney added that, “if the United States were under attack, there were an imminent threat,” the president has the authority to protect the country from that assault.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., criticized Paul for posing the question. “I find the question offensive,” he said on the Senate floor this morning. Not that the law matters to BamBam. but I think Paul just wanted it in writing from the administration..... Graham and McCain are griping up a storm about it but I think those two are and have been shills for BamBam since before the first election. I remember commenting on here that during the first election McCain seemed to be doting on BamBam like a proud Granfather, it made me sick then and it still does. Anyway, Holder reiterated that it's against the law, he never said BamBam wouldn't do it anyway. And Rand Paul was rockin it out on the floor yesterday! | |
|
Kitiara
Posts : 412 Reputation : 66 Join date : 2011-11-17
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Thu Mar 07, 2013 4:12 pm | |
| | |
|
Delfi Elite
Posts : 1827 Reputation : 169 Join date : 2011-08-11
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:20 pm | |
| You got some rep for that! I think the entire world has too many dumbed down people, Jesus wondered if there would be any faith left when he returned I wonder if there'll be anyone with half a brain! Besides us here on Watcher Meetup that is | |
|
researcher Admin
Posts : 14659 Reputation : 962 Join date : 2011-08-13 Age : 72 Location : San Diego
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:37 pm | |
| WOW, a whole half a brain!!!! All for me???? At the moment I've barely got two brain cells that talk to one another. The waiting is killing me! She got some more rep from me too. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Holder on Assasination of Americans on Our Soil=a go? | |
| |
|