O-bam-bam: Antichrist or Not? Voice Your Views, Scriptures, Feelings, Etc. All Views Welcome as Iron Sharpens Iron.

Isaiah 10:12
1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)
¹² But when the Lord hath accomplished all his work upon mount Zion and Jerusalem, I will visit the fruit of the proud heart of the king of Assyria, and his glorious and proud looks,


Isaiah 14:25
1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)

²⁵ That I will break to pieces Assyria in my land, and upon my mountains will I tread him under foot, so that his yoke shall depart from them, and his burden shall be taken from off their shoulder.


 
Daniel 8:23
1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)
²³ And in the end of their kingdom, when the rebellious shall be consumed, a King of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.






With much love & respect, I dunnnno..........If he's not 100%, he's -0-

Well since I can't stomach looking at him, I'll take your word for it.

If I said that I know 100% that he is not the AC, what would you say? He doesn't fit the biblical profile for the antichrist. Is he AN AC? Yes. But he is not THE AC. He will surely die. we'll just have to wait and see....but I don't think i'm going to be surprised on this one.

IMHO he looks so much like THE AC because that's exactly what he's been carefully crafted & engineered to appear to be; even down to his name. In my personal opinion he can't produce a valid birth certificate because BHO is his 'chosen' musloid name. He was born BS & invented BHO when he 'converted'. Of course no one can prove this, but like I've said before; neither he nor anyone else can prove it to be wrong either.

quietobserver wrote:

IMHO he looks so much like THE AC because that's exactly what he's been carefully crafted & engineered to appear to be; 

Exactly Quietobserver. So many people believe he is the AC because that is what the luciferian occultists who are going to bring about the NWO want us to believe. Its all part of their script.
http://anothervoicerev184.blogspot.com/2013/02/obama-unbreakable-alliance-israel-trip.html

*

jem wrote:

Remember I wrote this earlier in this thread?

jem wrote:

It's looking to me as if he (or his successor) might be found in Daniel 11:

The one that comes against the king of the south will do according to his own will (US). No one will stand against him. He will stand in the glorious land and consume it. Daniel 11:17 NASB - He will set his face to come with the power of his whole kingdom, bringing with him a proposal of peace which he will put into effect; he will also give him (nation of Israel) the daughter of women to ruin it. But she will not take a stand for him or be on his side. After this he will head to the isles (coastlands - I assume other nations in the area) and conquer many. But a prince (of the coastlands) will put a stop to this and repay him for his reproach. Then he (US) will return to his own land, stumble and fall, and not be found.

I just found something that might match. It's about the fall of Babylon.

Jeremiah 50 32 And the most proud shall stumble and fall, and none shall raise him up: and I will kindle a fire in his cities, and it shall devour all round about him.

If this is right, the timing is interesting and there would be more to Babylon because it also falls at the end. Also interesting that when this Babylon falls, it seems the 144,000 are called out of her about the same time.

Jem there is -0- here that you haven't led a discussion on previously. With that said, like researcher mentioned in another thread, iron sharpens iron or thereabouts.

*

the country where ac comes from will NOT BACK ISRAEL which looks more and more like the us...

gen10:8 And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.
9 He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.
10 And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. *
11 Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,

nimrod builded nineveh, now called asshur...assur...

ps83:7 Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek; the Philistines with the inhabitants of Tyre;
8 Assur also is joined with them: they have holpen the children of Lot. Selah. 


if there was proof O crawled out of the pit, i would say he was ac, but we don't know where he was hatched..hmmm...

New to the site and forum!   Now, COME ON PEOPLE!!!!

Revelation 17:10-11 tells us PLAINLY that the antichrist must be one of seven world dominating kings who have ALREADY lived.  That is not up for debate.  Either believe the scripture or don't.  The 8th (AC) is of the 7.  Period.

Furthermore, the Proto Evangelium (Genesis 3:15) dictates that the antichrist MUST be a nephilim (half Satan/half human).

These things are clear.  What IS up for debate is who the seven heads are.  After studying this for over 25 years, I have come to the conclusion that Peter Goodgame has nailed it in his book "The Second Coming of Antichrist".  

The antichrist, in my opinion, is clearly Nimrod, though he may go by the name Apollo.  If you are a serious Bible student, his book will answer your questions and you won't fall in this trap anymore of naming Obama, Prince William, the Pope, etc.

Welcome to the forum, bloodwashed. I too think Peter Goodgame makes a good case for Nimrod, or at least the spirit behind Nimrod (not a physical reincarnation of Nimrod himself). I mentioned this in an earlier post on this thread. Only time will revel how it all washes out in the end though. For the record, I don't think it's "O" or any other president.

Hello Bloodwashed, welcome!

Isn't Nimrod the #1 guy at the moment?  I was watching a video and at the end a fella  came on and his theory is that Obam is the image that speaks and Pope Francis is FP and we're waiting for the AC. I wish I could remember what video it was.

Again, scripture has to determine these things.  Obama cannot be the "image" - that's ridiculous.  The FP tells those on earth to "make" the image (Rev 13:14) and this is only AFTER the AC is revealed for the FP must be in the presence of the AC (Rev 13:12) to make the image speak.

We cannot let our hopes or opinions color what we say.  As Christians, we have to carefully follow the revealed Word. Also, it cannot be the "spirit" of Nimrod that is raised.  There are many "spirits" of Antichrist, and I agree, Obama is one.  So is GW Bush.  The list is endless.  But what makes the antichrist the "anti" Christ is his bodily resurrection.  This is why the world "wonders" after the beast.

The antichrist is the eighth head and is one of the previous seven.  Period. (Revelation 17:11).  Christians cant wish that away because they hate a president.  Let the world do that.  Also, Nimrod was an Assyrian and appears to possibly be a nephilim because (a) he became a "gibborim" (Gen 10: and he is not immediately mentioned as a son of Cush, rather Cush "became" his father. (Gen 10:7-.  The only other possible Assyrian it could be would be Antiochus Epiphanes - who by the way entered the temple in Jerusalem and sacrificed a pig on the altar. 

But the "son" worshipped in Babylon, Assyria, Egypt, Tyre and yes, even by the freemasons of the US, was Osiris - the master builder - who was none other than Nimrod.  The masons call him Hiram Abiff, which translates into Hebrew (read backwards) as "Hiram Our father, and can be stretched to mean Our father the Destroyer" or "Apollyon" or Apollo - who again is the retelling of the feats of Nimrod.

Lol.  OK, i'll stop.  BTW, I did not put the smiley faces in.  Every time I type an "eight", a smiley face appears.  weird.

bloodwashed wrote:

But what makes the antichrist the "anti" Christ is his bodily resurrection.  This is why the world "wonders" after the beast.

Yes but, it is appointed man to die ONCE, then the judgement. I can't get around that verse. However great effort has been expended to find Nimrod's body, mummy, etc. and I have no reason to doubt that it has been located, exhumed, and by now CLONED. There is good reason to watch for that clone as the clone has never lived before physically and would in fact be a perfect physical Nimrod. That's the only way I can see it happening and it is plausible.

I agree with you, it's hard to get around mentally at first, yet you either believe Revelation 17:11 or not and, if not, that causes more problems.  It says the 8th is one of the 7 previous heads and it says plainly the beast was and is not (in John's day) yet is the eighth.  Again - ANTI Christ.  Just as Jesus was the Lord God "who is and who was and who is to come" so the AC will be the one who was, was not, and yet is".  

Also, we have to be careful on the "it is appointed for men once to die" verse.  Elijah, Jesus and the Apostles raised the dead and those people who were raised all died twice.

And what do you do with this?  We know that Jesus is the "firstborn" of the Dead - meaning the first to be raised in a glorified body.  Yet on the Mount of Transfiguration (way before the cross) Elijah appeared with Moses in bodily form.  Elijah, fine, he hadn't died, but the Bible tells us Moses died on Mt Horeb.  How was he raised with a glorified body before the cross?   I believe the answer is that Moses didnt die, but was translated, and he will be one of the two witnesses (witnessed by the law and prophets...) and that Joshua "assumed" Moses died.

But in any case, I think Revelation is clear on the resurrection of the antichrist.

Go to the 45 minute mark in this video. Parts about digging up Gilgamesh aka Nimrod at that time count.