LAND GRABBING, WATER GRABBING, KID GRABBING, MORE, ALL COMES FROM ONE SOURCE DISTRICT OF CO MM IES

I post the way they want them seen... yes I see the finger! Sorry, but the author wants you to see it so there it is, naked for all to see. We could ignore it Like many things this country's people have in the past... but then it would just lead to this moment in time anyhow... .
My neighbor said where he works as an admin that the utilities district called to inform the business which employs all disabled / handicapped people would be fined 500.00 for leaking swamp cooler on the roof. Friend says to them... uh we have one toilet and one sink at location... it is the land lord you want to talk with as this building has many tenants and addresses of which only one has a swamp cooler. So GAME ON. Push us out over FINES for using water you pay for!
I say show past 10 years of water allotment of the county, compare with now!
You see our County has water rights to a flume that gets water from up stream and only comes from one lake. So it is guarenteed X amount no matter... unless lake dries up. BUT are the controllers of the dam letting out too much?????
http://www.iclei.org/ Had recently (1-2 yrs ago) tried to get the County Council to sign on to their Plan...our council said no. BUT, has this organization gotten some control over the Water Utilities???? I have been suspect of the problem for a while... If those in charge of the dams are on the side other than truthful then it is possible to let out too much water and hide the numbers as we see in many places these days, which brings us all in this nation to question many things and we need to monitor more closely. I say this because I frequent the back woods and view these rivers and streams frequently... in a good year they let much run down to lakes for agriculture only water use... so if the State has now cut off the water to the farmers of the "Big Valley" then the Barkly's don't need their lakes full. AND THE QUESTION IS how much is going down river and why and who and etc. Our lake has water in it... but for how long... and what about the rain... they are projecting something they cannot project based on past as now the .gov sprays and controls weather and claims the rain is theirs... see si mmmhum. Ricky says u got sum splainin to do!!!

 http://agenda21radio.com/?p=8612


New EPA Land Grab, Complete Control Over All Private Land in America

May 13, 2014

By Rick Wells
The EPA is in the process, right this very minute, of seizing control over all private land in the United States. They are following the United Nations blueprint, their minion Gina McCarthy is implementing it, and B. Hussein Obama is facilitating it.
Anywhere in America where it rains or where water collects or through which water moves will now, according to this new rule change they are implementing, be under their control. Not because Congress or the people give them that authority or jurisdiction, but simply because they are seizing the power. It is just another component of the illegitimate tyranny which is oppressing the American people.
On Tuesday the agency which operates as the misnamed Environmental Protection Agency unveiled their proposed change to the Clean Water Act, which would extend their regulatory control to temporary wetlands and waterways.
This definition consists of any water, including seasonal ponds, streams, runoff and collection areas and irrigation water. It could include runoff from watering your lawn, or puddles on your own property. They will control the presence of and can prohibit through regulation, your right to the water and your actions regarding water upon your own land. The opportunities for their abuse would be limitless.
Louisiana Senator David Vitter, the ranking Republican on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, offered an understated precautionary objection stating, “The … rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history.”
The EPA proposal would extend their authority to include “pollution regulations” to “intermittent and ephemeral streams and wetlands” – which are created temporarily during wet seasons or following rainfall.
Recognize this for what it is America; The EPA is giving themselves legal jurisdiction to replace our rights with their permissions anywhere it rains or water exists.
They are expanding the same kind of California fish-based drought or Nevada tortoise land restrictions or Oregon spotted owl tyranny to every square inch of the United States.
The EPA is asserting that all ground water, whether temporary or not and regardless of size is part of the “waters of the United States.”
Their position is in contradiction to the Supreme Court rulings in 2001 and 2006, restricting the EPA to flowing and sizeable, “relatively” permanent bodies of water such as “oceans, rivers, streams and lakes.” Of course, progressives just keep trying until they get what they want, and they never have enough.
The proposed rule change is now in a 90 day comment period during which they will assess just how much they can get away with, based upon public outcry and pushback.
Senator Vitter accused the EPA of “picking and choosing” their science and of attempting to “take another step toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the country.” He also warned that if approved, more private owners could expect to be sued by “environmental groups.”
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) shares Vitter’s concerns, warning of potential economic damage and questioning the EPA’s motivations.
She said, “[I]t appears that the EPA is seeking to dramatically expand its jurisdictional reach under the Clean Water Act. If EPA is not careful, this rule could effectively give the federal government control of nearly all of our state.
Of course, that is exactly what they are after, as well as 49 other states and territories.
Rick Wells is a conservative author who believes an adherence the U.S. Constitution would solve many of today’s problems. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.