Subject: Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin? Sat Aug 15, 2015 7:54 am
Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin?
August 15, 2015
August 14 2015
Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin?
BLOCKBUSTER: LATEST IMAGES SHOW THE BLAST PRODUCED A THREE ACRE LAKE!
The new lake in China proves a 5 kiloton blast, possibly nuclear or possibly from a space based “rod from God” (pictured to the left) weapon DEPLOYED BY THE SPACE PLANE, DING DING DING DING DING!.
At first I doubted the “rod from God” because I have no explanation for how one could drop out of orbit and actually fall, but evidently this system is real and they solved that problem. That would make the rod from God the prime candidate here, because the Chinese could easily trace down a nuclear blast.
UPDATE: ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER: Blasts were NOT RELATED, blast 1, the small blast, happened on the West side of the container lot, and was the crater everyone first saw with containers laying in it, thinking that was from the big blast. It was not. Blast 2, the lake making nuke type blast, happened on the East side of the container lot. The fire happened to the South of both blasts, approximately centered between them, and was ONLY A FIRE, there is no conceivable way it could produce blasts on both sides of a container lot, separated by over 200 yards. The materials in question simply could not do it. The warehouse that supposedly holding whatever exploded was erased by the large (rod from God or nuclear) blast, as was everything else around that blast.
The crater pictures people posted previously were from the small blast, not the big one, a new picture which clearly shows where the big blast went off just got released by China. After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb. There is no way the earthquake from this was in the 2’s. Take a look at the pond made by a test of a small nuclear weapon ground burst in Russia and compare it to that new lake in China, which is many times as big as the pond made by a nuclear test in Russia!
Now we have limited options for this blast, since nothing stored there could have possibly done this.
This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst,then a small nuclear weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.
A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a large deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake.
If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.
Look closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP, it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower left corner of this picture – they have no paint or color, which means they had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their original colors to some degree, complete color change to only gray proves this explosion was FREAKING HOT.
That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few alternative options (see Rod from God), No chemical blast did that, PERIOD.
The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get leveled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.
I think a glue fire was started as an excuse for this huge blast, which came considerably later. And who knows what made the first big blast, or smaller blasts that led up to it, but I am confident it was a show and not an accident. They wanted this filmed from all angles and set up the show to make sure people would be recording when the big one went off. If there were lots of little blasts before that, why was there not a single small blast after the big one? That is when I would think the small blasts should have started if this entire scenario was not contrived from the start.
What would be the motive for this attack? I don’t buy the currency devaluation, but something else very tasty was going on that a distraction was needed for.
@ http://allnewspipeline.com/Threat_Of_Nuclear_War_Intensifies.php 5 videos and more text at link above LOOK @ #5 SEE THOSE SPARKS THROWN UP, MAGNESIUM??? IT BURNS AT 3000+ DEGREES, MELTS MANY THINGS!!!! August 16, 2015
Threat Of Nuclear War Intensifies After Ukraine Erupts In All Out War - Horrifying Banned Pictures Emerge From Massive Explosion At China's Ground Zero!
By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die
After reading the new story from the InvestmentWatchBlog headlined "BREAKING--NOW! Ukraine Erupts Into All-Out War!" in which we learned multiple cities have come under attack with hundreds dead and cities burning after the French/German brokered 'Minsk Agreement' failed, we clearly see why US military analyst Stephen Lendman is warning that the threat of nuclear war with Russia has just increased immensely.
Ukraine is just the latest country to suffer mass casualties as amazing new pictures have emerged out of China seen here from a daring reporter who got as close to 'ground zero' as he possibly could. Describing these photographs here as like a 'scene from a movie', we see cars melted and completely destroyed. Propaganda officials in China have since banned media from reporting on the explosion or posting pictures/stories that did not originate from Xinhua. Why? Many more photographs at the bottom of this story.
We can see Ukrainian hostilities taking place in the 2nd and 3rd videos below which show Donetsk being shelled and we're told that there are attacks everywhere: Donetsk, Starobesheve, Bezimenne, Komsomolske, Horlivka, Tel’manovo, Staroihnativka, Avdiivka, Makiivka and Yakovlivka. In the 1st video, we learn why the threat of nuclear war with Russia has just intensified greatly and why the road to utter devastation may now be unavoidable. The 4th & 5th videos show the massive explosion in China that caused this.
Back on August 11th ANP published a story in which we asked if Americans would be ready if China and Russia were to suddenly attack. In it we shared a warning from former Fox News producer Jack Hanick that "if new hostilities start, Russia will not let the war be a proxy war where the US supplies weapons and advisors and lets others do the 'boots on the ground' combat. Russia will take the war to the U.S."
With 'new hostilities' having suddenly broken out in the Ukraine as seen in the videos below, soon after China was hit by the mysterious explosion which left cars completely toasted and mysterious melted silver liquid on the ground as seen in the horrifying pictures of devastation in this story, we have to ask how long it will be until 'war comes home' and if war here in America, on our home turf, is the reason for all of the massive military movements that we have seen across the country recently?
The Unhived Mind recently published a story in which they asked if all of this devastation in China was possibly caused by the US's secret spy plane, the X-37B...aka 'Rods From God'. We can see in the picture below the massive crater that was caused by the initial blast and we know from this 2012 BBC story that the X-37B had likely been spying upon China. With this recent story from the International Business Times telling us that both the US and China are now accusing each other of launching 'secret space missions' we're brought back to a January 2015 story in The Space Review called "The X-37B Program: An American Exercise In The Art Of War?" in which we learn from Sun Tzu.:
All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away, we must make him believe we are near. Hold baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is superior in strength, evade him. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.
With new fires and new explosions still rocking China's Tianjin, we also learn that accusations of a government coverup have been levied and the blast zone has been completely evacuated due to contamination fears. Questions for our readers: Do you think the pictures on this story show a 'normal explosion' or something much more, possibly nuclear? If this was somehow done by our own [size=16]government we have to ask, has WW3 already begun and they 'simply forgot' to tell us? [/size]
Last edited by spring2 on Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:58 am; edited 1 time in total
Guest Guest
Subject: The X-37B program: an American exercise in the Art of War? Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:54 am
READ THE FIRST PARAGRAPH AND HEED THESE TACTICS PERSONALLY!!!!
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2670/1
The X-37B, seen here after one of its missions, has generated considerable speculation about the true nature of its long-duration orbital missions. (credit: USAF) The X-37B program: an American exercise in the Art of War?
by Michael Listner Monday, January 5, 2015
Comments (43)
Quote :
All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away, we must make him believe we are near. Hold baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is superior in strength, evade him. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.1
Of all the space activities over the past four years, none has generated more conjecture and controversy than the United States Air Force and its operation of the X-37B mini-shuttle. The X-37B program began as a NASA program in 1999 before the program was transferred to the US Department of Defense in 2004. The first flight of the first of the two vehicles, designated OTV-1, was launched on April 22, 2010, and ended on December 3, 2010. The second flight, OTV-2, flown by the program’s second vehicle, launched on March 5, 2011, and returned over a year later on June 16, 2012. The third flight (OTV-3), performed by the refurbished first vehicle, is so far the most impressive: it launched on December 11, 2012, and landed almost two years later on October 17, 2014. The date of the fourth flight has yet to be announced, but at least one release points to a launch sometime in May of 2015.2
The most vexing characteristic of the X-37 for analysts and the public alike is the classified nature of its mission.
These long-duration flights are not the only things that draw attention to the program. The fact that the program is under the auspices of the Department of Defense and that its on-orbit activities remain classified generates substantial speculation. The US Air Force has maintained that the purpose of the X-37B is to test new sensors and new satellite technologies, and there is no reason to doubt that part of its mission entails that. Despite this, many speculate that the secrecy surrounding the X-37 shrouds a more nefarious purpose such as that of a “space weapon” or an anti-satellite weapon (ASAT). However, as noted by some, the size and the lack of maneuverability of the X-37, and the fact that the X-37 can be tracked even by amateurs as makes such a purpose dubious at best.3 Nevertheless, wild speculation about the purpose of the X-37 runs rampant, including space bombing, surveillance, interfering with other satellites, spying on the Chinese Tiangong-1, or deploying spy satellites.4 These theories about the X-37’s purpose are denied by the Air Force yet remain popular despite their impracticability, which ultimately works to the benefit of concealing the true nature of the program. The activities of the X-37 have not gone unnoticed by other spacefaring nations either, including geopolitical rivals. China in particular has taken notice of the X-37, and Chinese media reports echo the speculation that the X-37 could serve as a space weapon or a space bomber carrying nuclear weapons.5 While media reports such as this are clearly intended as propaganda, Chinese analysts and the PLA leadership likely take a pragmatic view of the X-37 and recognize the technical shortcomings of the vehicle that prevent it from being utilized as a space weapon or a space bomber. Even so, they do seem concerned that it could be the first step towards the development of a space-based weapon that could be deployed against ground targets.6 This line of thought is not surprising because this is a move that is not only considered an eventuality by Chinese military theorists but also has its foundations in the teachings of Sun Tzu.7 The most vexing characteristic of the X-37 for analysts and the public alike is the classified nature of its mission. The unwillingness of the Air Force to release details of the spaceplane’s purpose fuels speculation and generates concern that the opaque nature of its activities might cause a geopolitical adversary like China to overcompensate and lead to an escalation of military activity in outer space. This concern has led at least one group to call for more transparency in the program.8 Despite this concern, the Air Force will likely be unwilling to provide that transparency not only to protect the specific activities that the X-37 may be performing in orbit, but also to protect the perception of what a geopolitical adversary may infer its purpose to be. It goes without saying that the X-37 garners substantial attention, which the Air Force carefully cultivates to tantalize the imagination but not enough to reveal its function. Pre-launch photos of the X-37 being encapsulated, live launch webcasts, and post-landing photos are carefully released to the public to attract its attention and undoubtedly the attention of other players in the outer space arena. This, coupled with observations of the spaceplane’s orbital behavior by amateurs and foreign governments alike, feed an elusive yet alluring fixation with the spacecraft. In an exercise reminiscent of the Cold War space race between the United States and the Soviet Union, the Air Force may have used this interest to shift the world’s attention from an important Chinese human spaceflight launch. On June 16, 2012, Shenzhou-9 launched with China’s first woman in space, which was the same day that the Air Force chose to bring OTV-2 back from space. While it may be coincidence that the two high-profile events happened on the same day, the return of OTV-2 from orbit gained wide media attention and stole some of the thunder from a geopolitical competitor. Whether this was intentional or not, the result is that a Chinese crewed mission to outer space played second fiddle to the return of an uncrewed United States military spacecraft from its clandestine mission in outer space.
If the X-37 program is intended as a deception campaign to mislead the Chinese leadership into expending resources to react to a perceived threat, then it may have succeeded.
While it may seem incongruent to have such a high public profile to a classified mission, the dichotomy of the high-profile public face of the X-37, coupled with the cloak of secrecy surrounding the program, contributes to what may be its primary purpose: deception. As pointed out by John Pike, the main purpose of the X-37 may be to keep Chinese military intelligence officials guessing since they will have to respond to everything it might be.9 Building upon this view, the opaqueness of the X-37 program may a serve the purpose of forcing a geopolitical rival like China to expend national security and intelligence resources to discover the spacecraft’s mission and make a strategic decision on whether to duplicate or develop a countermeasure to the perceived capability. This effort of deception is enhanced by not keeping the program in the same cloud of secrecy surrounding the typical launch of an NRO or other national security asset but instead by keeping enough of the program out of the shadows to entice the public and geopolitical rivals to watch its activities even closer. This form of deception, whether intentional or not, is part of Cold War brinkmanship and is highly effective. A case in point occurred during the Cold War with the Soviet perceptions of the American Space Shuttle program. From the viewpoint of the Soviet military leadership, the shuttle represented a means to strategically bomb the Soviet Union from orbit, and as a potential ASAT because of the shuttle’s robotic arm. These perceptions were an impetus for the Soviet space program to develop its own shuttle and ancillary infrastructure, which required a substantial expenditure of resources for a shuttle that made one uncrewed flight.10 It is open to question whether the Space Shuttle was intended as an instrument for a deception campaign, and the Soviets response may have been merely tit-for-tat, yet the Soviets made a reactionary decision to move their space program along a path that they perceived was being taken by the United States. If the X-37 program is intended as a deception campaign to mislead the Chinese leadership into expending resources to react to a perceived threat, then it may have succeeded. Chinese media reported in 2011 a test flight of the Shenlong spaceplane that apparently included an airdrop from an H-6 bomber. But the nature of the Shenlong project’s testing, as well as what the robotic vehicle truly represents, remains sketchy. Several China watchers in the US have speculated what the Shenlong might represent, with some experts postulating that the Shenlong is simply a tit-for-tat response to the X-37 program.11 Regardless of whether the Shenlong is a direct response to the X-37, a reaction or response to another perceived threat, or the natural progression of Chinese military doctrine, the existence of the X-37 program surely played a role in the decision making process, and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) was required to expend resources to that end. Therefore, if the X-37’s role is that of deception, then it may well have succeeded in deceiving the PLA to follow the path they have taken with the Shenlong. On the other hand, deception campaigns can have unintended consequences and could potentially move a geopolitical rival to escalate a situation or mount its own deception campaign. PLA leadership, ingrained with the lessons of Sun Tzu, have unquestionably considered that the X-37 program may indeed be a deception program and decided to use the Shenlong as a means of deception as well. Yet, as noted earlier, the PLA leadership may see the X-37 as an eventual escalation in military activity by the United States and may decide to preempt the United States with an escalation of its own. An illustration of this occurred with the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), which was initiated on March 23, 1983, by President Ronald Reagan. The Soviet leadership perceived SDI as a space-based weapons system and paranoia among the Soviet leadership caused their existing space weapon program to be accelerated with the eventual, albeit unccessful, launch of the Polyus-Skif “battle station” on the inaugural flight of the Energia rocket.12
Whatever the true purpose of the X-37, the question always comes back to whether the program is worth the financial cost. If the primary purpose of the X-37 is deception, then the question is expanded to include whether it is worth the risk of prompting an escalation in outer space military activity.
It is debatable whether SDI was intended as a deception program, but the unintended consequences of Soviet perceptions of SDI contributed to an escalation that was thwarted by the failure of the Polyus-Skif to properly insert itself into orbit. Likewise, the X-37 program and its probable mission of deception gambles with the risk of unintended consequences, including an escalation of aggressive military activity in outer space, which is the purported rationale for calls of transparency. Whatever the true purpose of the X-37, the question always comes back to whether the program is worth the financial cost. Moreover, if the primary purpose of the X-37 is deception, then the question is expanded to include whether it is worth the risk of prompting an escalation in outer space military activity. The answer to both questions appears to be a qualified yes. X-37 operations appear to be expanding with the addition of a processing facility at Cape Canaveral, and public remarks from officials regarding the program are resoundingly positive. Therefore, it appears that whatever the mission of the X-37 may be, it has produced the intended results, and if deception is the primary or even unintended mission of the X-37 program, then that mission is sure to continue.13 Regardless of the program’s true purpose, if the X-37 program instigates the teachings of Sun Tzu to haunt the waking thoughts and dreams at night of Chinese analysts and the PLA leadership, then by one measure it can be considered an unqualified success.
Endnotes
James Clavell (translator), Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Chapter I, p. 11.
On December 19, 2014, SpaceFlight Now released a manifest for ULA showing a launch sometime in May 2015.
Mike Wall, “X-37B: The Air Force’s Mysterious Space Plane,” SPACE.com, March 28, 2014.
Elizabeth Howell, “X-37B Space Plane Returns: 5 Theories About Its Secret Mission,” LiveScience, October 17, 2014
“US X-37B aircraft had to stay in space for 400 days the task is unknown,” Xinhua, February 19, 2014 (via Google Translate).
Dean Chang, “When the Chinese look at the US X-37B, they see the future of space-based attack,” Foreign Policy, October 23, 2014.
Specifically, in the Art of War (James Clavell translation), Sun Tzu teaches that “With regard to precipitous heights, if you proceed your adversary, occupy the raised and sunny spots, and there wait for him to come up.”“…if the enemy has occupied precipitous heights before you, do not follow him, but retreat and try to entice him away.” From the Chinese perspective the X-37 may represent a first step by the United States of occupying the high ground of outer space. Chinese foreign policy has been such that it is trying to prevent the deployment of so-called "space weapons" by the United States through initiatives in the international arena such as the PPWT. While the issue of "space weapons" is amorphous at best, initiatives like the PPWT generate soft-power and give the issue political substance. This can be seen by 12 recent first drafts by the First Committee (Disarmament and International Security) dealing with among other matters the ‘no first placement of arms in outer space and ban on new types of weapons of mass destruction.’ The Committee voted (with the United States, Georgia, Ukraine and Israel voting against) to begin work on the latest draft of the PPWT, which would encourage those States... "with major space capabilities, to contribute actively to the peaceful use of outer space and to the prevention of an outer space arms race and refrain from actions contrary to that objective." Effectively, this gives the current draft of the PPWT, which may not ever have legal significance, sufficient political significance and creates legitimacy to the otherwise nebulous issue of "space weapons". All this is against a backdrop where China (with the help of Russia), seeking to ban a "space-based weapons" capability for other States, continues to develop a similar capability for itself. See generally, Michael J. Listner, “An exercise in the Art of War: China’s National Defense white paper, outer space, and the PPWT,” The Space Review, April 25, 2011.
Marica S. Smith, “Air Force X-37B Due to Land Tuesday, SWF Wants More Transparency About Its Missions,” SpacePolicyOnline, October 13-15, 2014.
Leonard David, “Secretive Air Force Space Plane’s Purpose Questioned,” SPACE.com, June 25, 2012.
See Michael J. Listner & Joan Freese-Johnson, “Object 2014-28E: Benign or Malignant?,” Space News, December 8, 2014
Leonard David, “China’s Mystery Space Plane Project Stirs Up Questions,” SPACE.Com, November 9, 2012.
Dr. Dwayne Day and Robert G. Kennedy III wrote an excellent article concerning Soviet efforts to develop space weapons during the Cold War and the history of the Polyus-Skif spacecraft itself. See Dwayne A. Day and Robert G. Kennedy III, “Soviet Star Wars, The launch that saved the world from orbiting laser battle stations,” Air & Space Smithsonian, January 2010.
Another angle of the deception campaign of the X-37 program may be to provide a high-profile target to distract ground surveillance away from a truly black outer space activity. Such distractions have been used to great effect to spoof photo reconnaissance satellites photographing targets of interest on the ground, but it is not outside the realm of possibility that the X-37 is used at times during its long-duration missions to distract amateur and government satellite trackers from other more sensitive orbital activities.
Michael J. Listner is an attorney licensed in New Hampshire and the founder and principal of Space Law & Policy Solutions, which is a legal and policy think tank/consultation firm that identifies issues and offers practical solutions for matters relating to outer space security and development. Contact Michael via email Michael@spacelawsolutions.com or visit his website at http://www.spacelawsolutions.com.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin? Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:04 am
One question we must examine is why this port?
One answer could be that those containers may have housed containerized missiles? Other weapons waiting for invasion?
What is your idea?
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin? Mon Aug 17, 2015 10:08 am
http://allnewspipeline.com/images/confedcomm.jpeg
Guest Guest
Subject: BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:07 pm
BOMBSHELL: China and America already at war: Tianjin explosion carried out by Pentagon space weapon in retaliation for Yuan currency devaluation... Military helicopters now patrolling Beijing
(NaturalNews) EXCLUSIVE: Mainland Chinese dissidents have handed Natural News the following bombshell story.
The Tianjin explosion, Natural News has learned, was waged as an act of "kinetic retaliation" by the Pentagon in response to China's currency war Yuan devaluation. The Chinese government has put in place unprecedented secrecy surrounding the mysterious explosion, and aggressive police state tactics are now being invoked to control the flow of information surrounding this event.
"Last week's explosions sent massive fireballs into the sky and hurled burning debris across the industrial area at the world's 10th-largest port, burning out buildings and shattering windows kilometres away," reports the Daily Mail UK.
The Chinese government's official explanation for the explosion, which has now killed 114 people, is a complete whitewash. China is going to declare regional martial law in the next 18 days, Natural News has learned, in order to exercise total control over the movement of people and information. The government has banned reporters from entering the area and has begun arresting bloggers who promote what the government calls "conspiracy theories" regarding the cause of the massive explosion.
China has blacked out reporting on Tianjin in exactly the same way the U.S. media blacked out reporting on Dr. William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower who admitted the CDC buried evidence linking vaccines to autism. In both China and the United States, when the government doesn't want the citizens to know something, it censors the story across the entire state-run media, invoking "information totalitarianism."
Immediately following the massive explosion, the Chinese government began flying "black helicopters" in formation across Beijing. Chinese dissidents took numerous photos of these helicopters and were able to deliver these exclusive pictures to Natural News:
A warning shot from the United States: Don't crash the dollar or sell our debt Chinese dissidents have told Natural News they have reason to believe the attack on Tianjin is a warning shot from the United States, which is terrified that China is on the verge of announcing its own gold-backed currency while declaring a fire sale on U.S. debt holdings.
The actions would collapse the U.S. dollar and destroy the U.S. economy, sending the United States into economic freefall. The "Rod of God" weapon deployment by the U.S. Pentagon, we're told, was America's "shot across the bow" to send a powerful warning message to China while disguising the attack as a domestic chemical explosion.
Timeline of events: China devalues currency, then Pentagon strikes in mere hours Consider the calendar of events in all this:
August 11, 2015: China devalues the Yuan by 1.9%, sending "shockwaves" around the world and setting off a "devastating" impact to the U.S. economy.
August 12, 2015: Tianjin struck by Pentagon's secret "Rod of God" weapon, a space-based top-secret kinetic weapon that can be dropped from high orbit to strike almost any land-based target. The weapon instantly destroys six city blocks on the edge of the city of Tianjin, sending a message to China that's eerily similar to the message sent by the United States in the dropping of the world's first atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. (Yes, the USA is willing to drop weapons of mass destruction on civilian populations. It has already done it twice!)
(For those following the Shemitah, the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan also occurred during a Shemitah year, in the month of august, 1945, exactly 70 years ago. This is precisely TEN Shemitah cycles ago, or what might be called a "deca-Shemitah.")
August 16, 2015: Obama issues stern warning "...about the presence of Chinese government agents operating secretly in the United States," reports The New York Times. "And it comes at a time of growing tension between Washington and Beijing on a number of issues: from the computer theft of millions of government personnel files that American officials suspect was directed by China, to China's crackdown on civil liberties, to the devaluation of its currency."
The Pentagon's secret space-based weapons The "Rod of God" weapon consists primarily of a kinetic weapon arriving with unimaginable kinetic energy... more than a small tactical nuclear weapon, in fact, giving it the appearance of a tactical nuke.
U.S. websites are now speculating that the Tianjin explosion was a U.S. space-based weapons test involving a "Rod of God" weapon dropped from orbit. "The [resulting] lake [crater] in China proves a 5 kiloton blast, possibly nuclear or possibly from a space based 'rod from God' (pictured to the left) weapon [was] deployed by the space plane," says The Unhived Mind.
"After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb... This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern around the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst, then a small nuclear weapon is the biggest possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters."
Space-based kinetic weapons "dropped" onto targets are explained by Popular Science in this article from 2004:
When instructed from the ground, the targeting satellite commands its partner to drop one of its darts. The guided rods enter the atmosphere, protected by a thermal coating, traveling at 36,000 feet per second--comparable to the speed of a meteor. The result: complete devastation of the target, even if it's buried deep underground.
"When required these projectiles can be commanded to dive, singly or en masse, at targets on the Earth's surface, smashing into the victim at orbital speed. As the projectile's kinetic energy is released, the blast would be equivalent to a large conventional bomb," explains Armaghplanet.com.
China to declare martial law as total control of information and people kicks into high gear Martial law will be declared across Beijing in the coming days, dissidents have told Natural News. Meanwhile, the Chinese government -- which runs a massive state-controlled firewall that snoops into all internet traffic and blocks VPN access -- has added "Tianjin" as a red flag keyword to its internet traffic filtering.
Local police raids have already begun at the locations of bloggers and independent journalists who have attempted to report true stories on what really happened at Tianjin. The Chinese government is engaged in a total cover-up.
Natural News has learned that the Chinese government is now setting up roadside checkpoints near and around both Tianjin and Beijing. Additional security measures now in place to control the movement of people include:
• All hotels are reporting details of visitors to the government, including passport numbers, nationalities, names and phone calls made from the rooms.
• Tourists who don't stay in hotels are now required to register with local police or risk arrest. The Chinese government has mandated that it must know the location of every person at all times.
• Red armbands are now being worn by workers to indicate they are serving as Stasi-like obedient police snitches. The red armbands indicate total obedience to the government, and the workers wearing them have all been trained in how to spot dissident behavior. It's China's version of "If you see something, say something" just as was pushed in the United States.
• In preparation for China's Sep. 3 celebration for the defeat of Japanese occupation -- it's the 70th anniversary -- China has banned Japanese writing in most of its large cities. Government propaganda runs 24/7, condemning the Japanese and the horrifying war crimes committed by Japanese soldiers against China. (It's true, the Japanese committed unimaginable atrocities such as mass-raping women and then chopping them into pieces with machetes to destroy the "evidence.")
• Helicopter patrols are now routinely witnessed across Beijing and Tianjin, where military choppers are flying in formation as a show of strength.
• Massive populations of laborers are now living in underground cities, underneath the clean, high-tech buildings of Beijing that seem like world-class architectural achievements. But underneath them, an entire class of sickly, impoverished laborers lives like rats, with very little food, poor sanitation and no sunlight.
If this war escalates, it could unleash a global currency war of attrition If this covert war between China and the United States continues to escalate, it would ultimately devastate the economies of both nations. Both China and the USA are currently experiencing shockwaves in their stock markets as bubble economies built on debt begin to unravel.
In these times of shaky financial foundations, it doesn't take much to topple public faith and unleash a mass exodus away from currencies and markets. It's also clear that the United States considers currency games to be acts of war while justifying "kinetic responses" to such events.
This is all fully aligned with the government policies set in motion by President Obama in 2011. "Washington will to [sic] consider using conventional weaponry in response to a cyber-attack on the United States, according a new US strategy," reported The Telegraph:
The White House's strategy statement on cybersecurity said the United States "will respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country".
"We reserve the right to use all necessary means – diplomatic, informational, military, and economic – as appropriate and consistent with applicable international law, in order to defend our nation, our allies, our partners and our interests," the May 16 document said.
Pentagon spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan confirmed that the White House policy did not rule out a military response to a cyber-attack.
Even further, Henry Kissinger had the following to say about U.S. China relations, as quoted from his website HenryAKissinger.com, in an article entitled The Future of U.S. - Chinese Relations; Conflict Is a Choice, Not a Necessity:
Just as Chinese influence in surrounding countries may spur fears of dominance, so efforts to pursue traditional American national interests can be perceived as a form of military encirclement. Both sides must understand the nuances by which apparently traditional and apparently reasonable courses can evoke the deepest worries of the other. They should seek together to define the sphere in which their peaceful competition is circumscribed. If that is managed wisely, both military confrontation and domination can be avoided; if not, escalating tension is inevitable.
If the United States defines currency war attacks as "cyber attacks," then we may have just witnessed the first application of that new war doctrine, where electronic "attacks" are met with kinetic responses from the Pentagon.
Let us all hope this doesn't escalate even further, or America will likely find itself on the losing side of any war involving economics, currencies or cyber warfare.
Sources for this article include: http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_CDC_whistl... http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/17/us/politic... http://theunhivedmind.com/wordpress3/did-the... http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-0... http://www.armaghplanet.com/blog/rods-from-g... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/no... http://www.henryakissinger.com/articles/fa04... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3200...
Subject: SkyWatchTV News 8/18/15: The Rod of God? Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:59 am
SkyWatchTV News 8/18/15: The Rod of God?
Published on Aug 18, 2015
Rumors are spreading that the disastrous explosion in China last week was the result of a secret American weapon. But would the US really risk nuclear war because China devalued its currency?
Also: SkyWatchTV goes on record--we do not believe an asteroid will hit the Earth in late September; volcanoes rumble in Ecuador and Japan; and transhumanists want to legalize human-robot marriage.
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Did the Rod of God weapon hit Tianjin?