Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ After Boston Bombing

Yeah!, but what needs to change is TERM LIMITS, AMOUNT OF MONEY USED TO RUN FOR OFFICE, NO MUD SLINGING, BACKGROUND CHECKS ON POLITICIANS, BIRTH CERTIFICATES, BAN BLOOMBERG, ETC ETC.
http://politicker.com/2013/04/bloomberg-says-post-boston-interpretation-of-the-constitution-will-have-to-change/

Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ After Boston Bombing

By Jill Colvin 4/22 12:24pm

Mayor Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. (Photo John Moore/Getty Images)

Mayor Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. (Photo John Moore/Getty Images)

In the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Monday the country’s interpretation of the Constitution will “have to change” to allow for greater security to stave off future attacks.

“The people who are worried about privacy have a legitimate worry,” Mr. Bloomberg said during a press conference in Midtown. “But we live in a complex world where you’re going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.”

Mr. Bloomberg, who has come under fire for the N.Y.P.D.’s monitoring of Muslim communities and other aggressive tactics, said the rest of the country needs to learn from the attacks.

“Look, we live in a very dangerous world. We know there are people who want to take away our freedoms. New Yorkers probably know that as much if not more than anybody else after the terrible tragedy of 9/11,” he said.

“We have to understand that in the world going forward, we’re going to have more cameras and that kind of stuff. That’s good in some sense, but it’s different from what we are used to,” he said.

The mayor pointed to the gun debate and noted the courts have allowed for increasingly stringent regulations in response to ever-more powerful weapons.

They want expand their power to search and arrest.

Quote :

Family ripped from their home at gunpoint; Police storm the property looking for terrorists

WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect, police and federal agents spent the day storming people's homes and performing illegal searches. While it was unclear initially if the home searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal searches.


Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2be_1366536241#5MfFqutILISJ3WdI.99

Quote :

What's Bad About a House-to-House Search?

by Michael S. Rozeff Article posted Apr 24 2013
In a house-to-house search, police can find evidence of many wrongdoings. This depends on other laws that are passed and what items may be searched. Police could find a copyright violation on most everyone's computer, for example. They could find drugs. They could find out-of-date prescription drugs. They could find weapons. They could find cash and seize it. It is the search power combined with other laws that become a powerful tool of repression.

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=43703

"The Nazis took control and transformed the traditional police forces of the Weimar Republic into an instrument of state repression and, eventually, of genocide."



The spectacle of Americans being routed from their homes with raised arms and herded down the street is not too far, however, from German soldiers arresting Jews in Warsaw in 1943:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FQ1-ZUN3Li0

Police searching House By House the Suspect bombing Boston