NZ POLICE "HAPPENED TO BE IN A TRAINING SESSION" WHEN MOSQUE SHOOTING BEGAN Published: March 18, 2019
SOURCE: THE FREE THOUGHT PROJECT
(Support Free Thought) - It took police officers in New Zealand 36 minutes to catch the terrorist who murdered 50 people in two Christchurch mosques last week. Dramatic footage shows that just two officers—only one of whom had a gun—apprehend the suspect after his bloody rampage. We are now learning that this response time would have been longer, but police happened to be conducting a drill nearby practicing for a similar attack. In what can be described as an extremely strange “coincidence,” Chris Cahill, a detective inspector who is president of a local labor union for police officers, explained that officers were involved in a drill near the city center when the shooting broke out. According to the NY Times,
Quote :
The police said a special armed tactical unit arrived at Al Noor Mosque four minutes after the first officers, or 10 minutes after the initial emergency call. Mr. Cahill said it normally would have taken longer, with team members summoned to a police station to suit up. On Friday, though, they happened to be in a training sessionin the city center and wearing their gear, he said.
[size] “Any police force in the world — to get to the scene in six minutes, a specialist team there in 10 — that would be a success,” Mr. Cahill said. Police in New Zealand don’t typically carry firearms, much less dress in tactical gear, so officers holding a drill with all their tactical equipment and weapons at the ready was a helpful coincidence indeed. For those who may be unaware, the significance of the drill is important due to the fact that most terror attacks in recent history have coincided with drills very similar to the actual terrorism that unfolds. In November of 2015, during the tragic attacks on Paris, it was later reported that Paris-area emergency personnel and ambulance crews were taking part in a simulated emergency exercise on the very same day. The exact nature of the drill was a simulated mass shooting attack, according to Dr. Mathieu Raux, emergency room chief at the Pitié-Salpetrière hospital in Paris. Also, during the 9/11 attacks on the U.S., North American Aerospace Defense Command’s (NORAD) was in the midst of a training exercise called Vigilant Guardian, which “coincidentally” simulated planes being hijacked by terrorists. A story in Aviation Week made clear the connection between the 9/11 attacks and the NORAD drills taking place at virtually the same moment: [/size]
Quote :
At 8:40 a.m. EDT, Tech. Sgt. Jeremy W. Powell of North American Aerospace Defense Command’s (Norad) Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) in Rome, N.Y., took the first call from Boston Center. He notified NEADS commander Col. Robert K. Marr, Jr., of a possible hijacked airliner, American Airlines Flight 11. “Part of the exercise?” the colonel wondered. No; this is a real-world event, he was told. Several days into a semiannual exercise known as Vigilant Guardian, NEADS was fully staffed, its key officers and enlisted supervisors already manning the operations center “battle cab.” In retrospect, the exercise would prove to be a serendipitous enabler of a rapid military response to terrorist attacks on Sept. 11. Senior officers involved in Vigilant Guardian were manning Norad command centers throughout the U.S. and Canada, available to make immediate decisions.
[size] As if these two events weren’t a strange enough “coincidence,” the London subway attacks on 7/7 also encompassed drills happening only days prior to that terrorist attack. A report by the Daily Mail stated: [/size]
Quote :
Police completed a terror training exercise, which envisaged an attack on London’s transport network just days before the 7/7 atrocity, an inquest heard today. During the ‘table top’ drill, officers were asked to respond to imaginary bombings at Waterloo, Embankment and St James’s Park Underground stations. But there was absolutely no intelligence at the time to suggest such an attack was imminent, the hearing was told… Christopher Coltart, barrister for some of the bereaved families, told the inquest the ‘Hanover’ exercise, which took place on July 1 and July 2 2005 and involved officers from the Met’s anti-terror branch, ‘had at its core, an attack on the Underground’. Asked if it was simply a ‘coincidence’ that this took place just days before 7/7, Mr Allison replied: ‘That’s entirely correct.’
[size] It seems odd that some of the most prolific terror attacks in recent history all share this common thread. This tragic event in New Zealand is already being used to go after free speech and gun rights. The New Zealand government began arresting people for sharing the video of the shooter’s live stream as well as pushing new gun laws. Another particularly strange coincidence is the fact that 30 survivors of the Parkland shooting traveled to Christchurch last July. The purpose of that trip, according to Sandi Davis, a sociology teacher at Stoneman Douglas, was a way to help the students cope with the tragedy they experienced and also as a way for them to learn how to sustain the anti-gun violence movement they had begun in the Parkland shooting’s aftermath.
[/size]
Quote :
NBC News
✔@NBCNews
[ltr]Parkland students mourn for friends made in Christchurch.
Nearly 30 students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School traveled there last summer to cope with their trauma.
“It’s kind of like the same feelings as when our school shooting happened." https://nbcnews.to/2F7Gexf [/ltr]
710 5:32 AM - Mar 16, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
Parkland students mourn for friends made in Christchurch
“It's heartbreaking because you know how they're feeling," one Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School teacher said. nbcnews.com
[size][ltr]
481 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
The prevalence of terror drills, which mirror the actual terrorist attacks, being run in such close proximity to the actual events taking place begs the question of whether these drills mirroring actual events are truly just a “coincidence,” or are perhaps an indication of something much more sinister. Either way, this terrorist scumbag who murdered innocent people will have his plans of stoking hatred and divide come to fruition as the media and government play right into his plan.[/size]
Yaddy
Posts : 777 Reputation : 151 Join date : 2012-01-04 Age : 85
Subject: Re: NZ POLICE "HAPPENED TO BE IN A TRAINING SESSION" WHEN MOSQUE SHOOTING BEGAN Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:14 pm
Hasn't that happened in just about every terrorist attack? In all the different countries? ( except when it's a real one...and several people, mainly Christians are killed, then no one reports it) I mean, that the police just happened to have a training session? Why make it so obvious!!!!
Guest Guest
Subject: New Zealanders Voluntarily Handing In Semi-Automatic Weapons For Destruction After Terror Attack Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:56 pm
As New Zealand reels from Friday's Christchurch mosque attack that left 50 dead and 50 wounded, Kiwis have started voluntarily surrendering their legally-owned semiautomatic firearmsfor destruction ahead of reforms promised over the next several days, according to New Zealand news outlet Stuff. The reports of citizens disarming themselves come amid a Monday announcement by Prime minister Jacinda Ardern that several "in principle decisions" on gun control have been made by Cabinet ministers, and has praised residents who have surrendered their guns to police. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern "Within 10 days of this horrific act of terrorism we will have announced reforms that I think will make New Zealanders safer," said Ardern, who donned a headscarf this weekend while visiting stricken Muslim communities. [/size]
Quote :
John Hart, who has been a sheep and beef farmer for 15 years, said he took his semi-automatic weapon into Masterton police station on Monday as he "couldn't in all conscience" keep the rifle after seeing the loss of life in Christchurch. -Stuff
[size][size] "Until today I was one of the New Zealanders who owned a semi-automatic rifle. On the farm they are a useful tool in some circumstances, but my convenience doesn't outweigh the risk of misuse," tweeted Hart.
[ltr] View image on Twitter
[/ltr][/size][/size]
Quote :
John Hart@farmgeek
[ltr]Until today I was one of the New Zealanders who owned a semi-automatic rifle. On the farm they are a useful tool in some circumstances, but my convenience doesn’t outweigh the risk of misuse.
We don’t need these in our country.
We have make sure it’s #NeverAgain[/ltr]
22.4K 8:25 PM - Mar 17, 2019
[size][size][size][ltr]
5,034 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
[/ltr][/size]
"Since the events on Friday I had been thinking a lot about the firearms we have here on the farm... They [semi-automatic weapons] are not critical, not if the trade off is loss of life," said Hart - who said he used his rifle for occasional pest control, but that he doesn't need semi-automatic weapons on his farm. While it can be useful "to have a second or third shot", that is "a minor inconvenience" compared to using a safer bolt-action rifle for the same jobs, he added. Official police figures show that nearly 7,000 New Zealanders are legally allowed to own semi-automatic weapons. Police have advised those who wish to turn theirs in first call their local police station or arms officer for advice on safely transporting them for destruction. "Walking up the long courtyard to the Masterton police station, towards a stone-faced policewoman guarding the door holding an AR15 at the ready, while I'm carrying a rifle (in its case) was, let's say, a puckering experience," said Hart.
[/size][/size]
Quote :
New Zealand Police
✔@nzpolice
Replying to @nzpolice
[ltr]As per existing processes we are happy for people to surrender their firearms to Police.[/ltr]
471 11:10 PM - Mar 17, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
[size][size][ltr]
137 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
Another Twitter user, @SirWB, wrote that he has "reflected and reserved my thoughts," before making "one of the easiest decisions I have ever made" to voluntarily disarm after owning a firearm for more than three decades.
[ltr] View image on Twitter
[/ltr][/size][/size]
Quote :
Blackstone@SirWB
[ltr]Since I first heard about the atrocity on Friday afternoon I have reflected and reserved my thoughts. Monday morning - this is one of the easiest decisions I have ever made. Have owned a firearm for 31 years.[/ltr]
5,740 3:18 PM - Mar 17, 2019
[size][size][size][ltr]
1,038 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
[/ltr][/size]
Following the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre in which 35 people were killed, Australia banned guns via the National Firearms Agreement, which resulted in confiscation of between 650,000 and 1 million firearms from private citizens. A [url=http://c3.nrostatic.com/sites/default/files/Baker and McPhedran 2007.pdf]2007 study[/url] by researchers Jeanine Baker and Samara McPhedran found that "when compared with observed values, firearm suicide was the only parameter the [National Firearms Agreement] may have influenced, although societal factors could also have influenced observed changes." [/size][/size]
Quote :
The following year, Wang-Sheng Lee and Sandy Suardi with the University of Melbourne concluded that "there is little evidence to suggest that [the National Firearms Agreement] had any significant effects on firearm homicides." Additionally, "the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearm deaths." -Newstalk1130
[size][size] But in the wake of a mass shooting, apparently all it takes to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy (or gal) who's given up their ability to defend themselves and their family.[/size] [/size]
Guest Guest
Subject: GLOBALISTS PREPARING NEW ZEALAND AS EMERGENCY REFUGE FOR GLOBALIST COLLAPSE Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:59 pm
GLOBALISTS MUST ROUND UP GUNS IN NEW ZEALAND.. AND WHAT ELSE TO PREP FOR THEM???
https://www.infowars.com/globalists-preparing-new-zealand-as-emergency-refuge-for-globalist-collapse/ VIDEO @ LINK
GLOBALISTS PREPARING NEW ZEALAND AS EMERGENCY REFUGE FOR GLOBALIST COLLAPSE
Find out why in this show clip
The Alex Jones Show - MARCH 18, 2019
23 [url=https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.infowars.com%2Fglobalists-preparing-new-zealand-as-emergency-refuge-for-globalist-collapse%2F&text=Globalists Preparing New Zealand As Emergency Refuge For Globalist Collapse][/url]
With the possibility of bad actors arranging the New Zealand shooting, many people are wondering why the elite would choose New Zealand to be the location of a “false flag.”
Vox Day joins Alex to explore all the facts thus far.
MEMORY HOLE NEW ZEALAND: NEWS REPORTS SUGGESTED 2 SHOOTERS; IEDS FOUND STRAPPED TO MULTIPLE VEHICLES; SUSPECT'S STRANGE TRAVEL HISTORY Published: March 19, 2019
SOURCE: ACTIVIST POST
By Aaron Kesel The official narrative being pushed in the mainstream press on the tragic shootings at two crowded mosques in New Zealand is that 28-year-old Brenton Tarrant murdered 50 people and injured scores of others at the time of this report by himself. However, there are more questions than answers regarding the attack. For instance, New Zealand authorities reported that after the incident four suspects were taken into custody — three men and a woman. Adding that they had found and neutralized several IEDs (improvised explosive devices) on the vehicles stopped during the arrests. MSN even wrote the IEDs were “attached to the attackers’ vehicles,” which was cited by Associated Press at the top of the article. New Zealand Police Commissioner Mike Bush said in a press conference reported by CNN that the vehicles authorities had stopped had contained IEDs strapped to them. “There were a number of IEDs attached to vehicles that we stopped,” Bush said.
This means that the people arrested weren’t just arrested for no reason and may have been involved despite the mum press failing to ask important questions. Early reports of the event by mainstream press suggests there were multiple shooters from witnesses and police as shown in these tweets.
Quote :
The Spectator Index@spectatorindex
[ltr]BREAKING: New Zealand Police reporting the possibility of three active shooters in the Christchurch mosque attacks[/ltr]
1,090 7:57 PM - Mar 14, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
[ltr]
1,076 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
[ltr] View image on Twitter
[/ltr]
Quote :
Ryan Saavedra
✔@RealSaavedra
[ltr]BREAKING: The New Zealand Herald reports that the shooting at the second mosque was stopped by an armed Muslim who "chased the shooters and fired two shots at them as they sped off."[/ltr]
10.6K 9:13 PM - Mar 14, 2019
[size][ltr]
5,110 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
[/ltr][/size]
This signifies one of two things: either this was a false flag attack, or there were more than one persons involved in this horrific act of murdering Muslims, and the New Zealand government has elected to declare the attack as a lone wolf gunman as a means of National Security. In either case, it would be a cover-up, which we see visibly taking place with information being memory-holed, as Activist Post contributor Vin Armani noted on Twitter.
Quote :
Ⓥin Ⓐrmani@vinarmani
· Mar 15, 2019
[ltr]I'll just leave this here:
Four people were arrested after this NZ mosque massacre. Watch how the other 3 disappear into the memory hole. That's because they were the state intelligence operatives who organized the shooting and convinced the low IQ shooter to do it.
Watch.[/ltr]
Quote :
Ⓥin Ⓐrmani@vinarmani
[ltr]That was FAST!
The memory holing has already begunhttps://amp.cnn.com/cnn/asia/live-news/new-zealand-christchurch-shooting-intl/index.html … pic.twitter.com/2LNStU3jcj[/ltr]
71 7:00 AM - Mar 15, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
[ltr]
38 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
Further, according to court documents reported by The New York Times, an 18-year-old boy, Daniel John Burrough of Christchurch, was also charged with “intent to excite hostility or ill-will.” Last Friday during prayers multiple people were maimed, police said, on what Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern described as “one of New Zealand’s darkest days.” The two shootings took place at Linwood mosque in Christchurch and Masjid Al-Noor mosque on Deans Avenue.
Quote :
NBC News
✔@NBCNews
· Mar 14, 2019
Replying to @NBCNews [ltr]Witnesses to shooting at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, describe the horrific scene inside. https://nbcnews.to/2TBiiwe [/ltr]
Witnesses describe chaotic scene at New Zealand mosque shooting
Witnesses to a shooting at a mosque in Christchurch, New Zealand, on Friday describe the horrific scene inside. nbcnews.com
Quote :
NBC News
✔@NBCNews
[ltr]New Zealand PM Ardern: "Many of those who will have been directly affected by the shooting may be migrants to New Zealand...they have chosen to make New Zealand their home and it is their home. They are us. The person who has perpetuated this violence against us is not." pic.twitter.com/R13wr38epR[/ltr]
486 8:49 PM - Mar 14, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
[ltr]
226 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
If we take the two locations on Google Maps, Deans Ave and Linwood Ave located in Christchurch, New Zealand we will see that the two avenues are approximately 15-20 minutes away from each other – give or take – by car and 1 hour 30 minutes estimated by foot according to Google Maps. This means that it would have been possible for the suspect Tarrant to have driven there, but unlikely if he walked there. With that said, it’s totally feasible that he did the act on his own, but there are still the remaining questions of IEDs on multiple vehicles and the fact that there were 3 other individuals arrested and witnesses stating multiple shooters, as well as video showing potentially two shooters, which has now been memory-holed from the Internet, ZeroHedge reported. Another odd key fact is Tarrant’s travel history. In the years before Tarrant allegedly carried out the worst mass shooting in New Zealand’s modern history, the Australian citizen claimed to have traveled abroad – visiting the Balkans, Western Europe, Pakistan, Turkey, Iceland, Poland, New Zealand, Argentina, Ukraine and even North Korea, SFGate reported. In the 74-page manifesto allegedly published by Tarrant on social media, he acknowledges that those experiences were overwhelmingly positive. “The varied cultures of the world greeted me with warmth and compassion, and I very much enjoyed nearly every moment I spent with them,” he wrote. (This manifesto has now been deleted everywhere.) In his manifesto, Tarrant further described how he was first radicalized in Europe in 2017 when his views “dramatically changed” on immigration. On that trip, he traveled through France, Portugal, and elsewhere, he wrote, and was horrified by a truck attack in Stockholm around that time left a young girl dead. Presumably, we can make an educated guess that the truck attack referenced was Rakhmat Akilov, 40, an Uzbek, who had hijacked a truck and steered it down a busy pedestrianized street and into a crowd of shoppers during that same year. Last year, Akilov was sentenced to life in prison and found guilty of terrorism and murder for the act of using a truck as a murderous weapon that killed five people and injured nearly a dozen others, NY Times reported. The effects of the recent mosque massacre formed calls for more censorship online and for social media companies to filter out violent content like the shooting that was live streamed. We also see an increase in going after human rights. We even see the demonizing of those looking for information. “Do not share the video or you are part of this,” a former FBI agent told CNN.
Quote :
CNN
✔@CNN
· Mar 15, 2019
[ltr]Hours after the New Zealand terrorist attack, copies of the gruesome video that appears to show the massacre continued to appear on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, raising new questions about the platforms' ability to manage harmful content https://cnn.it/2F3ce5z [/ltr]
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter struggle to deal with New Zealand shooting video
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are struggling to halt the spread of horrific footage that appears to show a massacre at a mosque in New Zealand as it was taking place. edition.cnn.com
Quote :
CNN
✔@CNN
[ltr]"Do not share the video or you are part of this," says a former FBI agent. http://cnn.it/2F2hmH3 [/ltr]
2,942 3:50 AM - Mar 15, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter struggle to deal with New Zealand shooting video
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter are struggling to halt the spread of horrific footage that appears to show a massacre at a mosque in New Zealand as it was taking place. edition.cnn.com
[ltr]
2,521 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
In one case a man was arrested in the UK for showing support for the shooting; which, argue as you may, creating charges like “sending malicious communications” is dangerous for a free and open society. The fact is we don’t know what was said, the 24-year-old man from Oldham’s intention, and if he really proclaimed support or is just questioning the event by remaining skeptical. The timing of this is interesting to say the least as this comes on the heels of ACTA 2 and a vote to pass an upload filter in Europe. Make of that what you will, but understand that the mainstream press is already pushing for an upload filter for content not regarding copyright by saying that social media companies couldn’t remove the video fast enough. In New Zealand possession of the video is punishable by up to 14 years in prison according to a tweet by freelance journalist Nick Monroe.
Quote :
Nick Monroe@nickmon1112
· Mar 16, 2019
Replying to @nickmon1112 [ltr]Perpetrator of New Zealand terrorist attack visited Turkey 'twice' http://archive.is/BhRO3 "probe is ongoing to establish Brenton Tarrant's movements in Turkey during his stay between March 17-20 and September 13 to October 25 in 2016, a senior Turkish official tells TRT World."[/ltr]
Quote :
Nick Monroe@nickmon1112
[ltr][img(16.05px,16px)]https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f6a8.png[/img]New Zealanders threatened with 10 YEARS IN JAIL if they have the shooting video. [img(16.05px,16px)]https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/1f6a8.png[/img]
"Anybody found “knowingly” in possession of objectionable material can receive a maximum of 10 years imprisonment."
14 YEARS IN JAIL if you are a "dealer" of the video http://archive.is/xT4Mz#selection-1417.92-1417.114 … pic.twitter.com/Jus4VLUvZB[/ltr]
1,175 11:36 AM - Mar 16, 2019 Twitter Ads info and privacy
[ltr]
1,093 people are talking about this
[/ltr]
If all of the above is not enough there is even a growing movement that wants to bar the media from saying mass shooters’ names after their despicable acts. However, that type of thinking is highly flawed. U.S joint chiefs of staff discussed faking mass shootings as a means to frame Cuba during Operation Northwoods. If we were to bar journalists from reporting the facts and being transparent about newsworthy events we would only foment conspiracy theories. I am not saying NZ was a false flag attack. But the shooter in the video live streamed was clearly trained, and the mention of two shooters in the mainstream press and other information being memory-holed is suspect to a cover-up for whatever reason that may be. This writer personally suspects and speculates this was a militant White Supremacist attack and that Tarrant had help. Tarrant flashed a White Power Symbol in Court according to the Guardian. The truth is: who the hell knows what happened? As humans, when some tragic event happens we try to make sense out of a situation when there are more questions than answers. But it sure looks like more than one person was responsible for such a massive massacre that has been the proverbial “gunshot heard around the world.” In 1992, New Zealand tightened its gun laws to restrict access to semi-automatic rifles two years after a mentally disturbed man shot dead 13 people in the South Island town of Aramoana in the 1990s, MSN reported. Six years later in 1996, a lone gunman used assault rifles to kill 35 people in the Australian state of Tasmania in what has infamously became known as the Tasmania shooting, Chicago Sun-Timesreported. In New Zealand’s sister country Australia, following the massacre in 1996, a virtual ban on private ownership of semi-automatic rifles, and a government-funded firearms buyback program, cut the size of the country’s civilian stockpile by almost a third. The measure was opposed by New Zealand who was represented at the 1996 meeting of Australian ministers, two weeks after the Tasmanian massacre. The council agreed that semi-automatic long arms would be banned except for use by licensed professional shooters. New Zealand was the only country out of nine jurisdictions at the conference to reject the gun confiscation legislation despite the shooting in the early ’90s. Already New Zealand is stating that gun reform is coming following the massacre, and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has further said that there will be no opposition to that legislation like the U.S, The Washington Times reported. It’s important to note this author believes that people died; and even if this was a false-flag attack, throughout history governments have suggested killing innocent civilians from Gladio to Operation Northwoods. Please don’t treat this as a crisis actor event because it’s not. May those lost for mere worship rest in peace regardless if this was a false flag attack or multiple shooters were involved — this was a tragedy. The New Zealand government has some questions to answer, though, given the complete whitewash of this narrative in a matter of hours of it happening. Interestingly enough, New Zealand’s laws for owning a firearm are “restrictive” — civilians are not allowed to possess handguns, military-style semi-automatic weapons or fully automatic weapons without a permit and a firearm license. However, according to NZ law, a 16-year-old can apply for a standard firearms license after completing a safety course, which allows them to purchase and use a shotgun unsupervised. In 2011, the Israeli secret service Mossad was accused of conducting an intelligence-gathering operation in New Zealand which was unearthed because of an earthquake in Christchurch that crushed a spy van and killed Ofer Mizrahi who had 5 passports at his time of death, Telegraph reported. Stratfor employees even emailed each other on 2011-07-20 about the story, according to WikiLeaks GI Files. In the gun debate, there is only one video that ever needs to be seen and that’s the U.S. Congressional hearing testimony of Suzanna Gratia Hupp, a survivor of the Luby’s shooting, also known as the Luby’s massacre. https://youtu.be/M1u0Byq5Qis
On October 16, 1991, George Hennard drove his 1987 Ford Ranger pickup truck through the front window of a Luby’s Cafeteria at 1705 East Central Texas Expressway in Killeen, screaming “This is what Bell County has done to me!” then opened fire on the restaurant’s patrons and staff with a Glock 17 pistol and later a Ruger P89. During the shooting, Hennard approached Suzanna Gratia Hupp and her parents. Hupp had actually brought a handgun to the Luby’s Cafeteria that day but had left it in her vehicle due to the laws enforced at the time, forbidding citizens from carrying firearms. According to her testimony in favor of Missouri’s HB-1720 bill (a law to allow concealed carry), after she realized that her firearm was not in her purse but “a hundred feet away in her car,” her father charged at Hennard in an attempt to subdue him, only to be gunned down; a short time later, her mother was also shot and killed. Hupp expressed regret for abiding by the law in question by leaving her firearm in her car, rather than keeping it on her person. She further stated that she didn’t blame the killer or the gun; she blamed her legislators because she couldn’t protect herself and her family. I’ll leave you with a quote from a founding father of the U.S. Benjamin Franklin, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” Someday you may be in Suzanna Gratia Hupp’s shoes wishing that you had a firearm to protect yourself or your family. It’s worth mentioning that the killer (or killers) was stopped by a man with a firearm. Although in a perfect world you shouldn’t need to have a gun to protect yourself, that’s not the type of society we now live in. A gun is a tool and it can be used for self-defense or aggression, it all depends on whose hand the weapon is in and the person’s intention. Aaron Kesel writes for Activist Post. Support us at Patreon. Follow us on Minds, Steemit, SoMee, BitChute, Facebook and Twitter. Ready for solutions? Subscribe to our premium newsletter Counter Markets. Image credit: South China Morning Post/Associated Press
SHARE THIS ARTICLE...
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: NZ POLICE "HAPPENED TO BE IN A TRAINING SESSION" WHEN MOSQUE SHOOTING BEGAN
NZ POLICE "HAPPENED TO BE IN A TRAINING SESSION" WHEN MOSQUE SHOOTING BEGAN
Subject: NZ POLICE "HAPPENED TO BE IN A TRAINING SESSION" WHEN MOSQUE SHOOTING BEGAN 
Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:36 pm
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern 
