HOW IT ALL FITS from JFK to THE THIRD AND FINAL STAGE!

YOU WILL WANT TO READ THIS!!!

eye opener... or maybe you wish to just close them and go back to sleep?

ouch, a pit bull just bit my arse.... well? I tried to warn ya....

PLEASE READ FULL ARTICLE AT LINK ... THESE POSTS BELOW ARE ONLY SNIPPETS!
http://americathebattlefield.blogspot.com/2014/06/origin-of-the-domestic-surveillance-grid.html

snippet:


JFK, you say? Yes. The same man who instituted the Arms Control and Disarmament Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. § 2551, created to establish a world governing body for the control of armaments, and Public Law 87-297, which calls for the United States to build-down and eventually eliminate its armed forces. That's right, the great John Kennedy, known for his pioneering efforts in civil rights and peace, was a powerful voice for the International Socialists who are attempting the dissolution and disarmament of nation states and the creation of a new international order which claims authority over the sovereign. Don't believe it? Here is the documentation, a comprehensive list of the Kennedy Administration's arms control and disarmament legislation, Senate filings, Executive Orders, and other papers, by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library.


For those who don't know, U.S. State Department Memorandum 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, spells out a plan to create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds." It further outlines the combining of the military forces of the United States with Russia in three stages, into what will be the peace-keeping forces of the new world government under the authority of the United Nations. We are currently in stage 2 of the plan, and moving inexorably into the final stage.

I wrote about some of the revelations in this document back on July 17th of 2012, in my blog, The True Agenda of U.N. and State Department Gun Control, but in my research I missed the key aspect of the document regarding establishing domestic surveillance on a nationwide scale.

The mandate for the implementation of a domestic video surveillance apparatus is embedded in stage 1, located in Section F of the memorandum. Here is the text from the document:
F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:
(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
What military forces do you think they're talking about? Federal military forces don't need to be reported on. Their concentrations and movements are not only already under closely monitored command and control, but illegal within the continental United States under Posse Comitatus.

They're specifically talking about militias. They're talking about American citizens who will execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions. They're talking about people who will fight Soviet, Chinese, and/or other troops both foreign and domestic, who attempt to occupy the United States as international "peace keeping" forces.

But what exactly do they mean by peace keeping forces? Karl Marx, regarded as the father of socialism, a screaming racist and the founder of the Ku Klux Klan, defined peace according to his ideology, saying, "The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism." Now you know exactly what the U.N. peace keepers are for. They are occupation forces for the world totalitarian socialist government.

To reduce the risks of war, indeed.

But that's not all. State Department Memorandum 7277 was issued in conjunction with key disarmament legislation by the United States and the Soviet Union. The following is an excerpt from Gary Allen's 1976 book, Kissinger: The Secret Side of the Secretary of State:
In the early '60s, Congress approved legislation creating something called the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. A program of "general and complete disarmament" became the official policy of the United States.
The entire sequence is a fascinating illustration of how the Shadow Government achieves its aims. The first serious disarmament proposal was produced by the Council on Foreign Relations in 1959. The idea was then discussed at a Pugwash Conference, and, in September 1960, the soviets presented their own disarmament program.
One year later, in September 1961, the Kennedy Administration issued its disarmament proposal, in State Department Publication 7277, Freedom From War.
Now, here is the clincher: all four proposals ― from the CFR, the Pugwash Conference, the Soviets, and the State Department ― are virtually identical.
If you have been reading my blog for any length of time, or researching geopolitical alliances outside the mainstream spectrum of acceptable debate; if you have read any books by A. Ralph Epperson, Cleon Skousen, Anatoliy Golitsyn, G. Edward Griffin, J.R. Nyquist, William Cooper, or Gary Allen, then you already know that the perceived aggressions between the United States and the Soviet Union ― not to mention the Cold War ― was a massive deception perpetrated on the people to generate fear and gain control over population groups. In truth, both the U.S. and Soviet Union were and still are allies behind the scenes. If you follow the money, the political and industrial relationships between U.S. and Russian interests confirm all of it.

The perceived aggressions continue to this day with the poorly-acted charade between Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama. Remember that all it took was one open mic to expose this fact. Obama carelessly exposed the pageant when a reporter's microphone was left open. Obama assured the departing Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev, that he will have the "flexibility" required to deal with missile defense issues after the 2012 presidential election. "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility," Obama implored. Medvedev responded, "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

Further proof is in the Open Skies Treaty, which:
"...establishes a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights over the territories of its signatories. The Treaty is designed to enhance mutual understanding and confidence by giving all participants, regardless of size, a direct role in gathering information through aerial imaging on military forces and activities of concern to them. Open Skies is one of the most wide-ranging international arms control efforts to date to promote openness and transparency in military forces and activities."
Even though officially the earliest mention of the Open Skies Treaty was in 1992, the flyovers have been going on all through the Cold War, ever since the Truman Administration. Not only that, the provisions of the treat ― and the international disarmament procedure as a whole ― mandate that it must always be overseen under the command of a Soviet flag officer.

So, how did that co-called "Cold War" work for everyone? It worked great for its engineers. Through its agents of fear, fanning the flames of rumors of wars and the ever-present threat of destruction, it successfully shoveled billions of dollars worth of taxpayer money into the coffers of defense contractors and government agencies.

Recall also the plot exposed by KGB defector, Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, when he warned the CIA in the early 1960's what would be carried out by the global Communist Party to bring America to its knees. In Golitsyn's 1998 book, The Perestroika Deception, he detailed the long-term top secret plan engineered by the Communist Party to morally, financially, and militarily weaken the United States of America in order to bring the nation into a global communist New World Order.

Senator Barry Goldwater was right. Congressman Larry McDonald was right. William Cooper was right.

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev also told the world what the plan was. Observe his transparent words to the Americans who opposed the plan:
"We will take America without firing a shot . . . we will bury you! . . . We can’t expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism . . . We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within."
And so they are.

H. Rowan Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation, which is part of the globalist syndicate working toward financial, educational, and political control, said in 1953:
"We at the executive level here were active in either the OSS [Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the CIA], the State Department, or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directions issued by the White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives [National Security Decision Directives], the substance of which were to the effect that we should make every effort to alter a life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union."

These people have been compromising this country for many, many years to destroy it from within, and we couldn't for the life of us identify the enemy, because we would never believe that it was Americans doing it.

But you see, they're not Americans. They're socialist/communist traitors. And they want to destroy this country so that they can realize the dream of the international one world socialist government. One class of people. One religion. Total control and ownership of everything and everyone by the State.

And when the people resist and rise up to form opposition forces, the eye in the sky is there to "report on concentrations and movements of military forces."


And if the cameras on the ground aren't enough, USA-247, also known as NRO Launch 39 or NROL-39, an American reconnaissance satellite operated by the National Reconnaissance Office, was launched on December 6, 2013. The USA-247 launch received a relatively high level of press coverage due to the mission's choice of logo, which depicts an octopus sitting astride the globe with tentacles unfurled, and the motto "Nothing Is Beyond Our Reach." The logo choice was extensively criticized in light of the 2013 surveillance disclosures.

These people who have their tentacles around the globe, those who Rolling Stone writer Matt Taibbi referred to in 2009 as the "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity," who are establishing observation posts to report on concentrations and movements of military forces, know that the only legal and lawful force of arms within CONUS ― according to the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution for the united States of America ― is the unorganized militia of the several states. And the militia, according to the law, is not a paramilitary organization. It is a military organization. They know the truth of this.

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
The following is the legal precedent of the militia, and it has never been amended nor repealed:

Constitution for the united States of America, Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have power...
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Bill of Rights, Amendment II:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
10 U.S. Code § 311 ― Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied malesat least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of themilitia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
The Federalist Papers No. 29, Concerning the Militia
From the Daily Advertiser
Thursday, January 10, 1788
Author: Alexander Hamilton
To the People of the State of New York:
THE power of regulating the militia, and of commanding its services in times of insurrection and invasion are natural incidents to the duties of superintending the common defense, and of watching over the internal peace of the Confederacy.

See also The Federalist No. 46.

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
Two landmark U.S. Supreme Court rulings also upheld the legal sovereign force of arms among the People:

In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the decision involved the Second Article and Amendment to the United States Constitution, and established the legal precident of the unorganized militia of the several states. U.S. v. Miller declared that ownership of a firearm could be restricted only if the firearm had no connection to military or militia activity. This case also strongly suggested that bans on military pattern firearms, ammunition, and magazines are unconstitutional, as these devices plainly are central to the effectiveness of the militia and its mission.
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }  

Likewise, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms for personal defense unconnected with service in a militia has been reaffirmed. The Court Justice Scalia wrote in the majority opinion: "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." Justice Scalia went on to define a militia "…comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense . . . The Anti-Federalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens' militia would be preserved."

In this case, the Supreme Court effectively struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determining that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment. And the true purpose of the Second Amendment is to guarantee a well regulated militia.

You see, the law is on our side; the side of We the People, the rightful masters of both the Congress and the Courts, composed of a body educated and trained to uphold and secure our Constitutional Republic.


The recent resurgence in the identification, demonization, vilification, and attempted nullification of Constitutionally-protected militia groups by the subversive elements operating from within the federal government, and supported by their lying news media propagandists, is reaching a fever pitch. It has also been said that the one thing that scares the money masters in London the very most is the growing "minutemen movement" in the States. In fact, they are doing everything they can to fund its opposition and nullification.

Speaking of the English, the British Security Industry Authority (BSIA) estimated there are up to 5.9 million closed-circuit surveillance cameras in their country, including 750,000 in "sensitive locations" such as schools, hospitals and care homes. BSIA's security industry report estimated that there exists one camera for every 11 people in the UK. And that report is a year old.

The United Kingdom has already fallen. Their traitorous leaders have already overthrown their Magna Carta, the 1215 charter ― a precursor to our Constitution ― that limited the powers of the King of England and protected the rights of the people. And isn't it very telling that the Magna Carts now resides within the walls of the U.S. National Archives building in Washington, D.C.? That would be like our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights being locked away in the Tower of London. What it means is that the Magna Carta is no longer in effect in its parent nation.

Americans are not like the English, however. We are not like the Soviets. We are not like the Chinese, the North Koreans, the Mexicans, or the Cambodians. We are, for the most part, fiercely nationalistic, patriotic, religious, and moral. We have come to embrace the Great Experiment of Freedom, and will not go silently into the night as it is stripped from us. As Barak Obama claimed at a midwestern fundraiser in April of 2008, we "cling to guns or religion or antipathy." Yes, we do, especially when traitors try to take it all away from us.

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
We have got to call them for what they are. If they are traitors, we must call them traitors. If they are liars, we must call them liars. If they have committed treason, we must say it aloud, and they must know that we are aware.

As we enter into the third and final stage of the plan, the United Nations recently posted job openings looking for U.S.-based Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Specialists.

Here is an excerpt of the text from the posting:
Posting Title: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4
Job Code Title: DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OFFICER
Department/ Office: Department of Peacekeeping Operations
Duty Station: NEW YORK
Work Experience: A minimum of seven years of progressively responsible experience in disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration or related area. Experience working within peacekeeping, peace-building or development programmes operations is desirable. Experience with small arms control, conflict/post-conflict crisis management, economic recovery is desirable. Experience coordinating multiple partner agencies, funds or programmes is desirable.
Languages: English and French are the working languages of the United Nations Secretariat. For the post advertised, fluency in English isrequired.
Notice that the spelling is clearly European.

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
If you live in New York, pay close attention to this. Especially as New York seems to be the major beta testing ground of domestic terrorism. Not only that, ISIS terror leader and mass-murderer, Al-Baghdadi, told U.S. troops in 2009 as he was being released, "I'll see you guys in New York." If that isn't a call-to-arms for the constitutional New York state militias to start recruiting and training, I don't know what is. And yet, the Mayor of New York City and the Governor of New York State are doing everything within their power to disarm their constituents. And the U.N. is forming "disarmament and demobilization" detachments within that very sector. So, the state and local governments of New York are effectively working in concert with U.N. disarmament policies.

One of the greatest advocates of the United Nations was President George Herbert Walker Bush. In a speech given to a joint session of the United States Congress on September 11, 1990, eleven years to the day before the attacks of 9/11, he said:
"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge."
Then, on January 16, 1991, he said:
"We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the rule of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."
As we know, the U.N.'s founders, especially Alger Hiss who authored the Charter of the United Nations, were exposed and convicted as communist Soviet spies. Addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. on February 1, 1992, Bush confirmed the end goal:
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance."
No one in the world can say it better than the people who are planning it themselves. Bush was only one in a thousand world leaders who have been calling for a system of global governance and international cooperation, and I would be all for that if it were to be implemented to actually end wars and establish global peace without infringing on the Creator-endowed rights of the people. But it isn't.

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
Read the U.N. Charter. Read their Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Neither one of these documents recognize that our rights are inherent and endowed by a Creator God. The U.N. affirms that our rights are privileges granted by the State. Privileges can be revoked at will.

No, the New World Order is not being implemented to bring about peace. It is in fact being implemented to establish a global monopoly of power and violence. During the United Nations Gun Debate at King's College in July of 2001, a U.N. spokesperson made this revealing statement:
"Civilian ownership of firearms in the U.S. threatens the legitimate powers monopoly of the State."
Their own words give them away, discredit them, and expose them for the traitors that they are. They discredit themselves better than anyone else ever could. They are their own worst enemy.

Its not the Russians and the Chinese who are destroying our freedoms. It is enemies of the Constitution who are posing as Americans right here at home, those who the United States Military Oath of Enlistment refers to when it affirms that the Oath-taking soldier will "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." That is why the enemies of our Constitution are telling us that the slaves cannot ― and must not ― be armed.


The observation posts are going up throughout our country to "report on concentrations and movements of military forces," so that when the people have had enough of this lawless agenda, those who are behind the subversion of our Republican form of government may "reduce the risks of war by accident, miscalculation, and surprise attack."

The enemy never wants to be caught off-guard; never wants to be surprised. It is a calculated military strategy. As former U.S. Navy SEAL, Ben Smith, warned, "The American citizen and the American service member are now the battlefield," and it all happened while we were sleeping, when we shirked our duties as Americans.

We have all at one time or another been greatly deceived, though. We were told to look over there across the sea, to revere the foreign enemy with terror. We were told that an outside threat was the cause of the infringement of our rights here at home, and that we needed to sacrifice our Liberty on the alter of security. We were told that the outside threat was so great, that only a national government with a monopoly of power could suppress it. We were told that the authority we granted to the State would be used responsibly, and would never be abused to oppress the people. We were told by the gate-keepers that, "it would never happen in America."

James Madison said:
"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy . . . The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad."
Does that sound familiar?

Cicero said it best when he warned:
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."
The rotting soul of a nation saw new lows in East Germany and the Soviet Union, when the Stasi, the East German Secret Police (or Ministry for State Security), and the NKVD, the People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs, established widespread surveillance of the people for purposes of control and purging of dissidents. No opposition can ever be allowed in socialist states, because the truth is the greatest weapon of all, and spreads like a wildfire in the hearts of men and women. Establishing an iron grip of control is the name of the game.

Our founders recognized this and dealt with it permanently in our Bill of Rights. The Fourth Article and Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
It is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. In order for an intrusion on a person's privacy to be legal and lawful, it has to be reasonable, supported under due process of law, provide that there is probable cause that you have committed a crime, contain a warrant signed by a judge who is under Oath, and must describe in detail the specific person, place, and thing to be searched and seized.

Without all of that combined, and until the Fourth Article and Amendment has been legally amended or repealed by the necessary two-thirds vote in Congress, no search or seizure of our person, place, or things; or infringement on our privacy is legal whatsoever, and is therefore null and void under the law.

What does that tell you about the emerging, all-encompassing surveillance police state, where you are considered guilty until proven innocent?

In closing, even if the subversives operating from within our government woke up one day and decided to all-of-a-sudden start obeying the law, there will still always have to be a militia in this country. Our forefathers understood what governments do. Historically, they have a tendency to gain power and become oppressive, and enslave the population.

That's why they gave us the Second Article and Amendment. That is exactly why we had militias back then, and exactly why we have them today. It is exactly the reason we must always have them, to be used as a last resort to defend against tyranny in government. Lawful and just governments have nothing to fear from an armed citizenry. Whereas, a government that distrusts its people owning weapons, has earned the distrust of its people.

James Madison said it all in I Annals of Congress 434 on June 8, 1789:
"A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
In the words of Aristotle:
"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms."
And that is why the domestic audio/video surveillance apparatus is being erected around us. The people who are actively destroying our country greatly fear the legal and lawful resistance of the People they intend to oppress. They want to monitor the resistance, reduce the risk of surprise attack, and formulate offensive demobilization and disarmament from the safety of a television screen.

They are so afraid of the People rising up and taking the law into their own hands to stop what is happening. And history has shown over and over and over again that it generally only takes 3% of any given population to suppress a foreign or domestic enemy takeover. Both the law and the odds are in our favor. The enemy is so far outnumbered and outgunned, it is absolutely unbelievable.

So, if we allow defeat with so much in our favor, then we deserve everything we get.

Keep in mind all of this is being done while the border is still wide open, and millions of illegal aliens are flooding into the country.

Join your local militia. Arm. Train. Prepare. Learn the law so you can recite it verbatim. Establish close, personal relationships within your community, and surround yourselves with like-minded patriotic American men and women who will stand for Freedom no matter what. Do it now. The numbers may be in our favor, but time is not.

Posted 23 hours ago by America the Battlefield
Labels: 4th Amendment ECHELON IntelliStreets Militias NROL-39 PRISM Surveillance The Grid Total Information Awareness Trapwire U.N. Disarmament Demobilization U.S. State Department Memorandum 7277 USA-247
 
1  View comments

AnonymousJune 27, 2014 at 5:16 PM
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
HAL : move the letters one space forward

H= I
A=B
L=M (me. Remember long time ago that report I did on 2001 Space Oddessy and the link of HAL in our computers tied to a small company in Silicon Valley?)

Reply

Loading

The following is the legal precedent of the militia, and it has never been amended nor repealed:

Constitution for the united States of America, Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have power...
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Bill of Rights, Amendment II:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
10 U.S. Code § 311 ― Militia: composition and classes
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied malesat least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of themilitia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
The Federalist Papers No. 29, Concerning the Militia
From the Daily Advertiser
Thursday, January 10, 1788
Author: Alexander Hamilton
To the People of the State of New York:
THE power of regulating the militia, and of commanding its services in times of insurrection and invasion are natural incidents to the duties of superintending the common defense, and of watching over the internal peace of the Confederacy.
See also The Federalist No. 46.

Two landmark U.S. Supreme Court rulings also upheld the legal sovereign force of arms among the People:

In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the decision involved the Second Article and Amendment to the United States Constitution, and established the legal precident of the unorganized militia of the several states. U.S. v. Miller declared that ownership of a firearm could be restricted only if the firearm had no connection to military or militia activity. This case also strongly suggested that bans on military pattern firearms, ammunition, and magazines are unconstitutional, as these devices plainly are central to the effectiveness of the militia and its mission.

Likewise, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), a citizen’s right to keep and bear arms for personal defense unconnected with service in a militia has been reaffirmed. The Court Justice Scalia wrote in the majority opinion: "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." Justice Scalia went on to define a militia "…comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense . . . The Anti-Federalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens' militia would be preserved."

In this case, the Supreme Court effectively struck down provisions of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional, determining that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment. And the true purpose of the Second Amendment is to guarantee a well regulated militia.

You see, the law is on our side; the side of We the People, the rightful masters of both the Congress and the Courts, composed of a body educated and trained to uphold and secure our Constitutional Republic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6cv0KsTTfY

The mandate for the implementation of a domestic video surveillance apparatus is embedded in stage 1, located in Section F of the memorandum. Here is the text from the document:

Quote :

F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack: 

Quote :

(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

What military forces do you think they're talking about? Federal military forces don't need to be reported on. Their concentrations and movements are not only already under closely monitored command and control, but illegal within the continental United States under Posse Comitatus.


They're specifically talking about militias. They're talking about American citizens who will execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions. They're talking about people who will fight Soviet, Chinese, and/or other troops both foreign and domestic, who attempt to occupy the United States as international "peace keeping" forces.



But what exactly do they mean by peace keeping forces? Karl Marx, regarded as the father of socialism, a screaming racist and the founder of the Ku Klux Klan, defined peace according to his ideology, saying, "The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism." Now you know exactly what the U.N. peace keepers are for. They are occupation forces for the world totalitarian socialist government.