see SPRING'S OCT-2 = & FCC Ruling Gives The Government Control Over 5G & FORDS PAPERS & URANIUM 1 +CLINTONS, 0, FBI REFUSAL RELEASE! &

1. RE: ADAMS ARTICLE YESTERDAY 


2. FCC Ruling Gives The Government Control Over 5G


3. Facebook hackers got access to your Tinder, Spotify, Instagram, Messenger and Airbnb too 
   


4. Exposing Ford's Paper On "Creating Artificial Memories"  
   
  

5. Military and U.S. Law Enforcement Establishing Joint Communication Network for Biometric Databases  
   



6. URANIUM ONE: FBI REFUSES TO RELEASE THREE-DOZEN SECRET MEMOS INVOLVING CLINTONS, RUSSIA AND OBAMA


p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }  

[size=10]by Tyler Durden
Tue, 10/02/2018 - 10:16

Quote :

“All four commissioners offered support for the rule, with Democrat Jessica Rosenworcel dissenting over only part of the proposal. When the new rules take effect, local officials will have 60 to 90 days to review installation requests.
Republicans on the commission say that limiting what they see as exorbitant fees in major cities will free up capital for companies like Verizon and AT&T to invest in building out their networks in underserved rural areas. The commission estimated that the rule will save wireless providers $2 billion.”

Quote :

“This is extraordinary federal overreach,” Rosenworcel said of the rule. “I do not believe the law permits Washington to run roughshod over state and local authority like this and I worry the litigation that follows will only slow our 5G future.” The Hill also notes that critics argue that the rush to a 5G future is leading to an increased “digital divide” between those who have faster internet abilities and those who do not.

Is 5G safe?

Quote :

“Additionally, the proliferation of small cells has prompted worries over potential health risks, particularly given how close some pole-mounted antennas are to homes. The FCC last updated its radiation exposure guidelines more than two decades ago, based mostly on existing cellphone towers. Citizens in several communities have protested installations, and the agency is in the process of updating its standards.”

Privacy, a Thing of the Past

Quote :

“Many of these technologies involve cameras that can be tasked with jobs that range from keeping track of traffic to monitoring when the corner trash can gets full. The problems start when they’re also used for tracking people and their movements. In a city blanketed with cameras — including in LED light bulbs found in streetlights — it would be very easy for the government to track which political meetings, religious institutions, doctors offices, and other sensitive locations people go to and to focus its attention even more on traditionally over-policed communities. This is why these “Smart Cities” are also referred to as “Surveillance Cities.”

Facebook hack timeline – when did it all happen?

• The vulnerability in Facebook's code was the result of three separate bugs
  
• These were created in July 2017, when Facebook created a new video upload functionality
  
• On September 16, 2018, Facebook discovered unusual activity, which manifested itself as a "spike in users", according to officials
  
• Facebook then launched an investigation
  
• On Tuesday, September 25, Facebook uncovered the attack and found the vulnerability
  
• On Wednesday, September 26, Facebook notified law enforcement
  
• On Thursday evening – September 27 – Facebook said it fixed the vulnerability
  
• On Friday evening – September 28 – Facebook disclosed the vulnerability to the public
  

#4

Kavanaugh Carnival Continues: Exposing Ford's Paper On "Creating Artificial Memories"

Does anyone remember that it used to be considered a conspiracy theory to warn people about biometric databases? Well, now that it is an accepted reality, we should be looking even farther down the slippery slope for new signposts indicating even greater plans to track, trace and database all human beings.
Apparently it is neither sufficient — nor efficient — to have the myriad databases currently at the disposal of agencies like the Department of Defense, FBI or Homeland Security. According to a release from Biometric Update, these agencies currently use different computer languages that have difficulty communicating with each other as seamlessly as the U.S. government desires.

Quote :

The U.S. Defense Department, the FBI, and the Department of Homeland Security are planning to establish a new standard in 2019 to allow their biometric databases to communicate seamlessly, DoD officials told an audience at the AFCEA (Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association) Federal Identity Forum in Tampa, Florida, SIGNAL reports.
The Electronic Biometric Transmission Specification (EBTS) version 4.1 will enable the DoD’s ABIS, DHS’s IDENT, and the FBI’s NGI (next generation identification) system to communicate natively, “in their own language,” according to DoD biometrics program chief engineer Will Graves. DHS is preparing to upgrade from its IDENT system to the new Homeland Advanced Recognition Technology (HART) in order to handle scale and capabilities far beyond those it was originally designed for.
“Hopefully we’ll be able to close the transactional and interoperability gap between DOD and DHS,” he says.
(Source)

Quote :

In early May the U.S. Department of Justice released a proposal which would exempt the FBI’s biometric database from public disclosure. Specifically, the proposal would exempt the Next Generation Identification (NGI) System from provisions of the federal Privacy Act, which “requires federal agencies to share information about the records they collect with the individual subject of those records, allowing them to verify and correct them if needed.” The proposal is open for public comment until June 6, 2016.
Although the database does contain biometric data on convicted criminals, it also contains information on individuals who were only suspected or temporarily detained under the suspicion of a crime. The system also features data from people fingerprinted for jobs, licenses, military or volunteer service, background checks, security clearances, and other government processes.
Essentially the FBI is arguing that it will prevent individuals from knowing if their information is in the massive database if the release of information would “compromise” a law enforcement investigation.
[…]
Jeramie Scott, a national security counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, told NextGov that the proposal “would set a worrying precedent in which law enforcement has significant leeway to decide what information to collect without informing the subject.”

URANIUM ONE: FBI REFUSES TO RELEASE THREE-DOZEN SECRET MEMOS INVOLVING CLINTONS, RUSSIA AND OBAMA